Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

1.23s

  • United States ex rel. Berman v. Craig

    107 F. Supp. 529 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 26, 1952

    The question is then presented whether, in the light of the facts of the instant case, the Selective Service Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously. See United States v. Grieme, 3 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 811 . … which was not before the Local Board at the time said Local Board reclassified relator into 1-A.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Pyrene Mfg. Co.

    111 F. Supp. 819 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 13, 1953

    Sims v. Greene, 3 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 87 . See also Eutectic Welding Alloys Corp. v. Zeisel, D.C.N.J.1950, 11 F.R.D. *821 78 ; Anderson-Friberg v. Justin R. Clary & Son, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1951, 98 F.Supp. 75, 82 . … The court notes the case of Jackson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Valentine v. Englehardt

    474 F. Supp. 294 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 18, 1979

    Levi, 573 F.2d 118 (2nd Cir. 1978); Norris v. Frame, 585 F.2d 1183 (3rd Cir. 1978); Patterson v. Morrisette, 564 F.2d 1109 (4th Cir. 1977); Miller v. Carson, 563 F.2d 741 (5th Cir. 1977); Duran v. … (Tr. 110, et seq., Brown; Tr. 434, Cunningham). As one former inmate testified, “Where there’s a will, there’s a way.” (Tr. 110, Brown). 17 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation

    364 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 17, 1973

    Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); Reynolds Metals Co. v. F. T. C., 114 U.S.App.D.C. 2 , 309 F.2d 223, 229-30 (1962); Sanitary Milk Producers v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, supra; Sanitary Milk Products v. Bergjans, supra; United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 297 F.Supp. 1061 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff’d sub nom., Bartlett v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mozier v. BD. OF ED. OF TP. OF CHERRY HILL, ETC.

    450 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 19, 1977

    Hochman v. Board of Education, 1977 S.L.D. ___ (January 6, 1977); Ramo v. Board of Education, 1972 S.L.D. 469; Branin v. Board of Education, 1967 S.L.D. 9; Amorosa v. … E. g., Dunellen Board of Education v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re the Score Board, Inc.

    238 B.R. 585 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 1999

    On May 8, 1996, The Score Board Inc. … Trooper Ink Co. v. Warren, 279 N.J.Super. 257, 263 , 652 A2d 749 (App.Div.1995); See also Bankruptcy Estate of B.J. McAdams, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 154 B.R. 809, 811 (N.D.Ga.l993)(citing Browning v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

    145 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 19, 1956

    The record of the Board presented here for consideration on this motion discloses that the award was against the petitioner herein. In the matter of Moore v. Illinois Central R. … In reviewing the method of operation by the National Railroad Adjustment Board, Judge Goodrich, speaking for this Circuit said, in Kirby v. Pennsylvania R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • SPRING CREEK REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER LLC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 24, 2024

    Defendant National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) opposed the motion. (ECF 15, “Opp.”) … Kos Pharms., Inc. v. Andrx Corp., 369 F.3d 700, 708 (3d Cir. 2004) (quoting American Tel. & Tel. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reid v. Barrett

    467 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1979

    Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 150 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). The Board is a “person” subject to suit, Monell v. … Board of Trustees of Edgefield County School Dist., 521 F.2d 1201 , 1205 (4th Cir. 1975) and the Superintendent, Akron Board of Education v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.

    149 F. Supp. 3d 502 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 21, 2015

    Karen Lew (“Lew”), Casino Manager, and Donald Browne (“Browne”), Senior Vice President of Casino Operations, were responsible for making decisions regarding retention of employees in the Games Department of the casino and … Browne testified that agreeableness, teamwork, and adaptability to change were the only criteria Browne Dep. at 10:23-11:11. Ms.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Finlin v. Pennsylvania Railroad

    187 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 3, 1960

    Co. v. … Co. *384 v. Price, 1959, 360 U.S. 601 , 79 S.Ct. 1351 , held that after a hearing by the board and a denial of his claim, an employee was not entitled to relitigate issues decided by the board. In that opinion Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rosenberg v. AT & T Employees Federal Credit Union

    726 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 5, 1989

    Wahl v. Rexnord, 624 F.2d 1169, 1181 (3d Cir.1980). When ruling on a motion for summary judgment the court must also consider the relevant burdens of proof at trial. Celotex Corp. v. … Plucinski v. I.A.M. National Pension Fund, 875 F.2d 1052, 1055 (3d Cir.1989) (citing Cort v. Ash). In Northwest Airlines, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC

    77 F. Supp. 2d 559 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 1999

    In Verkouteren v. Blackrock Fin. … The court concluded that plaintiffs bare allegation that the directors served on multiple boards for substantial compensation was insufficient to plead domination. Verkouteren , at 260-61. In Migdal v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Acton Corp.

    131 F.R.D. 431 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 22, 1990

    AMENDED OPINION BROWN, District Judge. This Amended Opinion 1 resolves two motions for intervention or, in the alternative, consolidation, brought by seventeen defendants in a related action, United States v. … The Government also relies on United States v. Browning-Ferris Indus., No. 89-568-A (M.D.La.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection v. Goddard (In Re Goddard)

    212 B.R. 233 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 7, 1997

    MEMORANDUM OPINION BROWN, District Judge. … United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). A bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law are subject to plenary review. Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • TRENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION v. FOUNDATION ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 27, 2023

    Four v. … V. DISCUSSION A.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Matreale v. State of New Jersey Department of Military & Veterans Affairs

    418 F. Supp. 2d 603 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 8, 2006

    In Feres v. … In Wenger v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • THORPE v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 28, 2024

    MEMORANDUM ORDER THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., Defendants. … Deutsch v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • THORPE v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 4, 2024

    MEMORANDUM ORDER THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al. Defendants. … (citing Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 662 (3d Cir. 2019)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ryan v. Burlington County, NJ

    708 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 6, 1989

    In Smith v. … Pennsylvania statute for legislative enactments by municipal boards. 728 F.2d at 174-75 ; see Donivan v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.