Case law

RANDOLPH BOARD OF EDUCATION, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY v. T

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 13, 2024

Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 179-83 (1983) (recounting the history and purpose of the IDEA); see 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(1). … v. M.R., 680 F.3d 260, 269 (3d Cir. 2012) (quoting Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49, 53 (2005)).

Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.—Pension Fund v. Able Truck Rental Corp.

822 F. Supp. 1096 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 21, 1993

Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Able Truck Rental Corp., 822 F.Supp. 1091, 1095 (D.N.J. 1993). … In Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. — Pension Fund v.

BROWN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 12, 2025

BROWN, Civil Action No. 25-15467 (SDW) Plaintiff, v. … Brown, a pretrial detainee confined in Middlesex County Adult Correctional Center (“Center”), filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1).

Advanced Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Shalala

974 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 11, 1997

Fifth, review of the ALJ’s decision is in the Departmental Appeals Board; a decision of the Board triggers the 60-day period for seeking judicial review in the federal district court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), supra … They rely primarily on Bowen v.

Ten Thousand & Eighty-Two Oak Ties

87 F. 935 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 20, 1898

Davis v. Wallace, Fed. Cas. No. 3,657. To the same effect is the case of Diky v. … Fish v. One Hundred and Fifty Tons of Brown Stone, 20 Fed. 202 .

Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. Alloway Township School

790 F. Supp. 2d 221 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 7, 2011

Bright v. … Brown v. Pa. Dep’t of Health Emergency Med. Servs. Training Inst., 318 F.3d 473 , 482 (3d Cir.2003).

NJSR Surgical Center, L.L.C. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.

979 F. Supp. 2d 513 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 24, 2013

See also Brown v. Ancora Psychiatric Hosp., 2012 WL 4857570 , *2, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146251 , *8-9 (D.N.J. Oct. 11, 2012) (Bumb, J.) … Board members may be removed from office by the Governor for cause, N.J.S.A. § 27:25-4(b), and the Governor has veto power over any action taken by the Board. N.J.S.A. § 27:25-4®. Gibson-Homans Co. v.

Peters v. Township of Hopewell

534 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 19, 1982

Regrettably the trees turned brown and the so-called “garages” appeared to the neighbors as unsightly as the objects they were intended to conceal. Peters erected high and low walls made of concrete blocks. … In Gipson v.

Lightner v. Dauman Pallet, Inc.

823 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 4, 1992

In NLRB v. … Kelly, 722 F.2d 873 (1st Cir.1983); Detroit Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671 (6th Cir.1979); Oneonta Dress Co. v.

Kantonides v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

802 F. Supp. 1203 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 10, 1992

v. … She had not yet received her boarding pass, was not imminently preparing to board the plane and was not at that time under the direction of the carrier’s personnel. Id.

Hildebrand v. United States

563 F. Supp. 1259 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 16, 1983

In Brown v. United States, 51 A.F.T.R.2d (P-H) ¶ 83-379 (N.D.Ill.1982) the court rejected the argument that the plaintiff dfd not act “willfully” because he did not know the extent or seriousness of the delinquen-' cy. … In Monday v.

Green v. Club Royale

13 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 11, 1935

This rule was adopted in Capron v. … This case was cited with approval by Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. 112 [ 8 L.Ed. 885 ].” Mansfield, C. & L. M. Ry. Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379 , at page 382, 4 S.Ct. 510, 511 , 28 L.Ed. 462 .

Cuneo v. International Union of Operating Engineers

216 F. Supp. 173 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 16, 1963

Of course, in a section 10 (J) proceeding of this nature, the Court must determine only whether or not the Board has “reasonable cause to believe” that the unfair labor practice charged has been committed. Schauffier v. … In view of the Court’s agreement with the views expressed by Judge Worten-dyke in Cuneo v.

McMahon v. General Dynamics Corp.

933 F. Supp. 2d 682 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 20, 2013

See Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., 450 F.Supp.2d 1373, 1381 (N.D.Ga.2006) (Koohi’s one-paragraph discussion of extending sovereign immunity to private contractors was “conclusory, not analytical”). … Kellogg, Brown & Root, Inc., 444 F.Supp.2d 1277 (M.D.Ga.2006) (same). Many other courts, however, have declined to dismiss such suits. See, e.g., Aiello v.

Pascarell v. Gitano Group, Inc.

730 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 13, 1990

The Board found that Gitano had violated NLRA § 8(a)(5) and ordered Gitano to bargain. 288 NLRB No. 2 , 129 L.R.R.M. 1086 (1988). The Board's decision was enforced by the Third Circuit. N.L.R.B. v. … There is no dispute between the parties that the theory on which the Board relies is “substantial and not frivolous.” The legal theory of the Board’s complaint is well-grounded in law. See e.g. N.L.R.B. v.

American Marine Rail NJ, LLC v. City of Bayonne

289 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 6, 2003

See Transcript of Planning Board Meeting, DiLascio Cert., Exhibit II. In addition, at the Planning Board meeting, anti-New York garbage sentiment was expressed by local residents. … In Grimm v.

Application of Johnson

178 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 8, 1957

Master v. Baldi, 3 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 113 ; and in Brown v. … Master v.

Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency

32 F. Supp. 2d 753 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 27, 1999

Komac v. … Gilian Instrument Corp., 271 N.J.Super. 476, 500 , 638 A.2d 1341 (App.Div.1994); accord Brown v. Youth Services Intern. of Baltimore, Inc., 904 F.Supp. 469 (D.Md.1995); Dunham v.

Oquendo v. Bettcher Industries, Inc.

939 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 1996

See Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155, 165-68 , 484 A.2d 1234, 1239-41 (1984) (requiring a product to be “suitably safe after it has been ... foreseeably altered”); Soler v. … Brown, 98 N.J. at 168 , 484 A.2d at 1241 .

Exxon Shipping Co. v. Exxon Seamen's Union

788 F. Supp. 829 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 14, 1992

v. … The Scope of Arbitration Authority and the Arbitration Board Findings Courts play a limited role in reviewing arbitration awards. United Paper-workers Int’l Union v.