Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

1.20s

  • HAGE v. AMERICAN BOARD OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 9, 2020

    Id. at 61 (citing Stewart Org., Inc. v. … See, e.g., Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 235 (1981); Baumgart v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rolo v. City Investing Co.

    845 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 27, 1993

    Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1993). See also Norris v. … Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1993).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Paparozzi

    219 F. Supp. 2d 635 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 16, 2002

    See Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 373 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979); Prevard v. … See Burgos v. New Jersey State Parole Board, No. Civ. 99-3034(AET), 2000 WL 33722126 at *7 (D.N.J. August 7, 2000).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • M. A. v. WALL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 2020

    World Entm’t Inc. v. Brown, 487 F, App’x 758, 761 (3d Cir. 2012). … Virginia v. Crouch, No. 17-1910, 2017 WL 6045448, at *6 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 2017) (citing Moore v. Hosemann, 591 F.3d 741, 747 (Sth Cir. 2009); Chapman v. N.Y.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • C.P. OBO F.P. v. CLIFTON BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 6, 2020

    Schoch v. First Fid. Bancorp., 912 F.2d 654, 657 (3d Cir. 1990); see also Gleason v. Nw. … Carlisle Area Sch. v. Scott P., 62 F.3d 520, 528 (3d Cir. 1995) (quoting Ali v. Gibson, 631 F.2d 1126, 1129 (3d Cir.1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS v. GREWAL

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 29, 2020

    No. 1. v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236, 240–41 (1968) (considering challenge brought by local school board against state under the Establishment Clause). Tahoe v. … v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic Cty., 893 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wm. H. McGee & Co., Inc. v. UNITED ARAB SHIPPING

    6 F. Supp. 2d 283 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 29, 1997

    “The local movement of the [CJargo was coordinated by the Irwin Brown Co., customs brokers, also located in New Orleans.” Id., ¶ 9 . … Shell Oil Co., 917 F.Supp. 324 , (D.N.J.1995); Tranor v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 388, 391 (E.D.Pa.1996). The burden is not on the plaintiff to show the proposed alternative forum is inadequate.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Meyers Excursion & Navigation Co. v. The Emma Kate Ross

    41 F. 826 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 4, 1890

    Her course was diagonally across the river, heading at first, apparently, for the Erie Railroad ferry, and showing those on board the Chrystal Stream only her red light. … Taylor v. Harwood, 1 Taney, 444 ; The Hercules, 17 Fed. Rep. 606; The Eleonora, 17 Blatchf. 88 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Darnell Brown v. Hudson County Correctional Facility, et al.

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2025

    PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DARNELL BROWN … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Siss v. County of Passaic

    75 F. Supp. 2d 325 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 19, 1999

    See Rice v. Union County Regional High School Board of Education, 155 N.J.Super. 64, 74 , 382 A.2d 386 (App.Div.1977), certif. denied, 76 N.J. 238 , 386 A.2d 863 (1978); Oliven v. … See Robertson v. Fiore, 62 F.3d 596, 601 (3d Cir.1995). Whether an employee has a protected property interest in retaining a given government job is determined by state law. See Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • MALDONADO v. CITY OF PASSAIC BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 21, 2020

    See, e.g., Brown v. Cantineri, No. 14-6391, 2017 WL 481467, at *2 (D.N.J. Feb. 6, 2017). C. … See, e.g., Brown, 2017 WL 481467, at *2 (“Because I have already given [Plaintiff] one opportunity to amend, this dismissal is with prejudice.”); accord Foster v. Raleigh, 445 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MARTZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 31, 2019

    See Hubbard v. … See also Marnin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • G.L. AND C.L. v. VERONA BORO BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 26, 2024

    Id.; see also Pollock v. … . § 18A:11-1(c) merely authorizes boards of educations to “[m]ake, amend and repeal rules, not inconsistent with [Title 18A] or with the rules of the state board, for its own government and the transaction of its business

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • STAR INSURANCE COMPANY v. IRVINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 17, 2019

    The cases cited by the Board do not detract from the force of these holdings. McMahon v. … Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 139 8. Ct, 2713 (2019), cited by the Board, requires little comment.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • A.C. v. TRENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 7, 2023

    See Blanciak v. … (collecting cases)); see also Arizona v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MUNS v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 17, 2019

    Celotex Corp. v. … See Callison v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hudson County Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of Jersey City

    960 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 17, 1996

    BROWN: Yes, I’m prepared to say that. Transcript of September 24,1996 at 19. Mr. Brown then changed his position: MR. BROWN: I’m sorry, I’m going to have to backtrack on that, no. … BROWN: That is correct, your Hon- or. That is how the ordinance is written, yes. Transcript of September 24, 1996 at 19-20. Later in the argument, Mr. Brown turned back towards his original position, noting: MR.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robeson Process Co. v. Robeson

    293 F. 70 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 26, 1923

    While the board of directors was composed of men of large interests and of the highest integrity and ability, they were of his own selection, were apparently satisfied with Mr. … This is at variance with Brown’s process in three respects: First, cyaniding follows concentrating; second, it is a system condemned by Brown and one he sought to avoid, in that, where ‘concentration * * * is used preliminary

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Treusch v. Center Square Supermarket, LLC

    921 F. Supp. 2d 336 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 31, 2013

    The Plaintiff filed opposition and relies solely on Brown v. … The Plaintiff here relies on Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • DAVENPORT v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 11, 2019

    INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (“Board Defendant”), New Jersey Department of Treasury … During each of those occasions, Plaintiff contends that Board Defendant either did not offer him an interview or did not seriously consider him for the position; rather, Board Defendant offered the position to a white

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.