Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,737 results
1.20s
HAGE v. AMERICAN BOARD OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 9, 2020
Id. at 61 (citing Stewart Org., Inc. v. … See, e.g., Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 235 (1981); Baumgart v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown845 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 27, 1993
Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1993). See also Norris v. … Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1993).
Cited 17 timesPublished219 F. Supp. 2d 635 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 16, 2002
See Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 373 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979); Prevard v. … See Burgos v. New Jersey State Parole Board, No. Civ. 99-3034(AET), 2000 WL 33722126 at *7 (D.N.J. August 7, 2000).
Cited 9 timesPublishedM. A. v. WALL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 2020
World Entm’t Inc. v. Brown, 487 F, App’x 758, 761 (3d Cir. 2012). … Virginia v. Crouch, No. 17-1910, 2017 WL 6045448, at *6 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 2017) (citing Moore v. Hosemann, 591 F.3d 741, 747 (Sth Cir. 2009); Chapman v. N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknownC.P. OBO F.P. v. CLIFTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 6, 2020
Schoch v. First Fid. Bancorp., 912 F.2d 654, 657 (3d Cir. 1990); see also Gleason v. Nw. … Carlisle Area Sch. v. Scott P., 62 F.3d 520, 528 (3d Cir. 1995) (quoting Ali v. Gibson, 631 F.2d 1126, 1129 (3d Cir.1980)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownOCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS v. GREWAL
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 29, 2020
No. 1. v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236, 240–41 (1968) (considering challenge brought by local school board against state under the Establishment Clause). Tahoe v. … v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic Cty., 893 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWm. H. McGee & Co., Inc. v. UNITED ARAB SHIPPING
6 F. Supp. 2d 283 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 29, 1997
“The local movement of the [CJargo was coordinated by the Irwin Brown Co., customs brokers, also located in New Orleans.” Id., ¶ 9 . … Shell Oil Co., 917 F.Supp. 324 , (D.N.J.1995); Tranor v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 388, 391 (E.D.Pa.1996). The burden is not on the plaintiff to show the proposed alternative forum is inadequate.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMeyers Excursion & Navigation Co. v. The Emma Kate Ross
41 F. 826 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 4, 1890
Her course was diagonally across the river, heading at first, apparently, for the Erie Railroad ferry, and showing those on board the Chrystal Stream only her red light. … Taylor v. Harwood, 1 Taney, 444 ; The Hercules, 17 Fed. Rep. 606; The Eleonora, 17 Blatchf. 88 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedDarnell Brown v. Hudson County Correctional Facility, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2025
PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DARNELL BROWN … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown75 F. Supp. 2d 325 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 19, 1999
See Rice v. Union County Regional High School Board of Education, 155 N.J.Super. 64, 74 , 382 A.2d 386 (App.Div.1977), certif. denied, 76 N.J. 238 , 386 A.2d 863 (1978); Oliven v. … See Robertson v. Fiore, 62 F.3d 596, 601 (3d Cir.1995). Whether an employee has a protected property interest in retaining a given government job is determined by state law. See Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMALDONADO v. CITY OF PASSAIC BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 21, 2020
See, e.g., Brown v. Cantineri, No. 14-6391, 2017 WL 481467, at *2 (D.N.J. Feb. 6, 2017). C. … See, e.g., Brown, 2017 WL 481467, at *2 (“Because I have already given [Plaintiff] one opportunity to amend, this dismissal is with prejudice.”); accord Foster v. Raleigh, 445 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMARTZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 31, 2019
See Hubbard v. … See also Marnin v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownG.L. AND C.L. v. VERONA BORO BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 26, 2024
Id.; see also Pollock v. … . § 18A:11-1(c) merely authorizes boards of educations to “[m]ake, amend and repeal rules, not inconsistent with [Title 18A] or with the rules of the state board, for its own government and the transaction of its business
Cited 0 timesUnknownSTAR INSURANCE COMPANY v. IRVINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 17, 2019
The cases cited by the Board do not detract from the force of these holdings. McMahon v. … Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 139 8. Ct, 2713 (2019), cited by the Board, requires little comment.
Cited 0 timesUnknownA.C. v. TRENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 7, 2023
See Blanciak v. … (collecting cases)); see also Arizona v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMUNS v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 17, 2019
Celotex Corp. v. … See Callison v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHudson County Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of Jersey City
960 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 17, 1996
BROWN: Yes, I’m prepared to say that. Transcript of September 24,1996 at 19. Mr. Brown then changed his position: MR. BROWN: I’m sorry, I’m going to have to backtrack on that, no. … BROWN: That is correct, your Hon- or. That is how the ordinance is written, yes. Transcript of September 24, 1996 at 19-20. Later in the argument, Mr. Brown turned back towards his original position, noting: MR.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRobeson Process Co. v. Robeson
293 F. 70 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 26, 1923
While the board of directors was composed of men of large interests and of the highest integrity and ability, they were of his own selection, were apparently satisfied with Mr. … This is at variance with Brown’s process in three respects: First, cyaniding follows concentrating; second, it is a system condemned by Brown and one he sought to avoid, in that, where ‘concentration * * * is used preliminary
Cited 4 timesPublishedTreusch v. Center Square Supermarket, LLC
921 F. Supp. 2d 336 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 31, 2013
The Plaintiff filed opposition and relies solely on Brown v. … The Plaintiff here relies on Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDAVENPORT v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 11, 2019
INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (“Board Defendant”), New Jersey Department of Treasury … During each of those occasions, Plaintiff contends that Board Defendant either did not offer him an interview or did not seriously consider him for the position; rather, Board Defendant offered the position to a white
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna