Case law

Blake Gardens, LLC v. New Jersey

309 F. Supp. 3d 240 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 15, 2018

See generally, Gregory v. S. … V. Fair Housing Act ( Fed. R. Civ.

MOUNT LAUREL TOWNSHIP v. CHARERNSOOK

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 24, 2023

James Assocs. v. Larsen, 67 F. … See, e.g., Brown v. Moore, 366 F.

<font color="red">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font> -TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-1856

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 29, 2024

Tr. v. … v. Superior Ct. of California, San Francisco Cnty., 582 U.S. 255, 262 (2017); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011).

Barrentine v. New Jersey Transit

44 F. Supp. 3d 530 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 2, 2014

Goodman v. … Hildebrand v.

McGarry v. Resolution Trust Corp.

909 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 5, 1995

In Murphy v. Federal Deposit Ins. … North Arkansas Medical Center v.

Worrell v. ELLIOTT & FRANTZ

799 F. Supp. 2d 343 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 28, 2011

Brown v. U.S. Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155 , 484 A.2d 1234, 1239 (1984) (citing Soler v. Castmaster, Div. Of H.P.M. Corp., 98 N.J. 137 , 484 A.2d 1225, 1229 (1984)). … Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. v. Arcadian Corp., 189 F.3d 305, 313 (3d Cir.1999) (“Under New Jersey law negligence is no longer viable as a separate claim for harm caused by a product.”); Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v.

Drescher v. Excelsior Insurance

188 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 4, 1960

That an appraisal will lie where there is a total loss, see Stout v. Phoenix Assurance Co. of London, 1904, 65 N.J.Eq. 566, 56 A. 691 . … This is quite in addition to the fact that the Board of Appraisers will include a representative selected by the defendants if they adhere to this Court’s decision.

Inflexible Co. v. Megibow

251 F. 924 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 1, 1918

Justice Brown, in the Barbed Wire Patent, 143 U. S. 275 , 12 Sup. Ct. 443, 450, 36 L. … A. 56 ; Mast, Foos & Co. v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co. (C. C. A. 8) 82 Fed. 327 , 27 C. C. A. 191 ; H. Mueller Mfg. Co. v. Glauber (C. C. A. 7) 184 Fed. 609 , 106 C. C. A. 613 ; Drum v. Turner (C. C.

Prevard v. Fauver

47 F. Supp. 2d 539 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 28, 1999

They must pass two boards of review to be eligible for parole: the Special Classification Review Board (“SCRB”) and the State Parole Board (“SPB”). … A 2C inmate generally would not appear before the parole board until his mandatory minimum sentence had expired.

BROWNE v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 16, 2022

Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 935 F. Supp. 513, 516 (D.N.J. 1996). … Brahamsha v. Supercell OY, No. CV 16-8440, 2017 WL 3037382, at *3 (D.N.J. July 17, 2017) (citing Bromwell v. Michigan Mutual Ins. Co., 115 F.3d 208, 213 (3d Cir. 1997)).

Hansen Savings Bank v. Office of Thrift Supervision

758 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 31, 1991

Wellmore Builders, Inc. v. Wannier, 49 N.J.Super. 456, 463 , 140 A.2d 422, 426 (App.Div.1958). See also *245 Lawrence v. … See Berger v.

Sery v. Federal Business Centers, Inc.

616 F. Supp. 2d 496 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 14, 2008

Defendants additionally counterclaim alleging that Plaintiff Michael Sery, as a member of the FBC Board of Directors, misrepresented the views of his family to fellow members of the FBC Board. … As the basis for their misrepresentation counterclaim, the Defendants have alleged that Michael Sery, in his role as a member of the FBC Board, misrepresented the views of his family members to his fellow Board members.

DICKERSON v. NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 29, 2025

See Walton v. Mental Health Ass’n of Se. Pa., 168 F.3d 661, 667 (3d Cir. 1999); Brown v. City of Long Branch, 380 F. … Courts have recognized that closely related defendants, such as a board and the entity it governs, are in privity for preclusion purposes. See Lubrizol Corp. v.

LEWIS v. VESTBERG

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 22, 2024

Vestberg, who is an alleged board member of Verizon Wireless and/or Cellco Partnership. (D.E. … Brown v. Quinn, No. 20-7002, 2021 WL 5782973, at *2 (D.N.J. Dec. 7, 2021) (quoting Nyholm v. Pryce, 259 F.R.D. 101, 104 (D.N.J. 2009)).

Kessler v. William Necker, Inc.

258 F. 654 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 9, 1919

Reynes v. Dumont, 130 U. S. 354 , 9 Sup. Ct. 486, 32 L. Ed. 934 ; Brown v. Lake, 134 U. S. 530 , 10 Sup. Ct. 604, 33 L. Ed. 1021 . … Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co., 134 U. S. 550 [10 Sup. Ct. 604, 33 L. Ed. 1021 ]; Town of Mentz v. Cook, 108 N. Y. 504, 508 [ 15 N. E. 541 ]; Horn v. Pere Marquette R. R. Co. [C. C.] 151 Fed. 626, 633 .”

DUGAN-HAND v. GRIFFITH

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 14, 2021

Bond Fund v. WithumSmith Brown, P.C., 692 F.3d 283, 303 (3d Cir. 2012); see also Chamberlain v. Giampapa, 210 F.3d 154 (3d Cir. 2000). … Orsatti v. New Jersey State Police, 71 F.3d 480, 484 (3d Cir. 1995); accord., Jackson v. Danberg, 594 F.3d 210, 227 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing Acumed LLC v.

Fajardo v. Foodtown Supermarkets

702 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 29, 1988

Perez v. Dana Corp., 718 F.2d 581, 588 (3d Cir.1983); see also Taylor v. … If plaintiff had done so, the Executive Board would have been required to respond within 30 days of its next meeting.

Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of America, Inc.

734 F. Supp. 1171 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 18, 1990

Professional Golfers Ass’n v. … The power to stay a cancellation proceeding resides only in the Board itself. The Other Tel. Co. v. Connecticut Nat. Tel. Co., 181 U.S.P.Q. 779 , 782 (Com’r 1974); see Rule 2.117 (TMRP).

Passaic United Hebrew Burial Association v. United States

216 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 1963

The Board of Rabbis of the Passaic-Clifton area supervises and controls the religious aspects of plaintiff’s-activities. … Mueller Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra; Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden, etc., 263 U.S. 578 , 44 S.Ct. 204 , 68 L.Ed. 458 (1924); Lewis v. United States, supra.

Hirschbach v. NVE BANK

496 F. Supp. 2d 451 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 24, 2007

Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Auth., 350 F.3d 338 , 346 (3d Cir.2003). It is “an Art. Ill as well as a statutory requirement” and “it functions as a restriction on federal power.” Id. at 346-47 (quoting Ins. … In this Court’s view, the analysis in a case decided in this district after Grable, Stechler v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP, is directly on point. Stechler v.