Case law

United States ex rel. Harrington v. McCandless

43 F.2d 760 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 1930

Claussen v. Day, 279 U. S. 398 , 49 S. Ct. 354 , 73 L. Ed. 758 ; United States ex rel. Rios v. Day (C. C. A. 2). 24 F.(2d) 654 ; United States ex rel. Bardakos v. Mudd (D. C. Md.) 33 F.(2d) 334 . … Rios v. Day (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 654 , supra; United States ex rel. Bardakos v. Mudd (D. C.) 33 F.(2d) 334 .

Yeager v. Cendant Corp.

190 F.R.D. 331 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 13, 1999

After the merger, 15 directors designated by CUC were elected to join Cendant’s 30-member Board of Directors. … See Eli Lilly and Co. v.

Hurd v. Hutnik

419 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 23, 1976

In Stopford v. … Brown, 528 F.2d 69, 72 (9th Cir. 1975) (no violation of trustees’ duty in awarding larger increase in pension benefits to active employees than to retirees); Kiser v.

Peter Holding Co. v. Le Roy Foods, Inc.

107 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 28, 1952

D.Mo.1949, 82 F.Supp. 635, 638 ; Board of Directors of Crawford County Levee Dist. v. Whiteside, D.C.Ark.1949, 87 F.Supp. 69, 71, 72 ; and Nelson v. Camp Mfg. Co., D.C.S.C.1942, 44 F.Supp. 554 . … Daugherty v. Western Union Telegraph Co., C.C.Ind. 1894, 61 F. 138 ; Hurd v. Gere, C.C.N.Y. 1899, 38 F. 537 ; and Lusk v. Lyon Metal Products, D.C.Mo.1949, 9 F.R.D. 250 .

Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Dillard

88 F. Supp. 3d 399 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 27, 2015

See HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Brown, No. 13-7439, 2014 WL 5361933 , at *2 (D.N.J. Oct. 21, 2014) (remanding a foreclosure action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. … Ramos v. Quien, 631 F.Supp.2d 601, 609 (E.D.Pa.2008); see also McMullin v. Harleysville Ins. Co., Inc., No. 14-7537, 2015 WL 586007 , at *1 n. 2 (D.N.J. Feb. 11, 2015); Gola v.

United States v. De Freitas

410 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1976

S. v. Thompson, et als., 361 F.Supp. 879 (D.Ct.,D.C.,1973). … Conceivably, he can ask the State Parole Board for a hearing on whatever charges may be pending for parole violation, and the usual arrangements between the jurisdictions can be made for his. appearance there.

PARRISH v. GREUNER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 2025

See Lujan v. … Trust v. Withumsmith Brown, P.C., 692 F.3d 283, 287 (3d Cir. 2012) and Estate of Allen v. Cumberland County, 262 F.

United States Ex Rel. Miscavage v. Howard County District Court

339 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 16, 1972

Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962); United States ex rel. Craig v. Myers, 329 F.2d 856 (3 Cir. 1964). … Under N.J.S. 2A :85-12 a fourth offender may be sentenced for any term of years or for life; under N.J.S. 30:4-119 prior offenses are considered by the Parole Board. 2 . Honorable R. W.

Moore v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

198 F. Supp. 3d 385 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 27, 2016

See, e.g., Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 3 Cranch 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806); Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185 , 110 S.Ct. 1015 , 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990); Lincoln Prop. Co. v. … Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 724 F.3d 337, 346 (3d Cir.2013) (citing Grand Union Supermarkets of the Virgin Islands, Inc. v. H.E.

In re Michael J. Hughes & Co.

110 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 27, 1953

See Herman v. Brickman, Super.Ct.App.Div.1950, 8 N.J.Super. 204 , 73 A.2d 730 . The present facts call for - an application . of this general. principle. … Particularly pertinent is the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in Murphy v. W. H. & F. W. Cane, Inc., E. & A. 1912, 82 N.J.L. 557 , 82 A. 854 .

United States v. Price

577 F. Supp. 1103 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 28, 1983

See United States v. Wade, 546 F.Supp. 785 (E.D.Pa.1982). Roche also argues that § 107 was only meant to be utilized by the government to sue for those costs already incurred. See, e.g., State ex rel. Brown v. … It appears with respect to § 107, that the government must first begin the cost of the clean-up and incur some expenses before it can initiate an action. 42 U.S.C. § 107 (a)(1); see Brown v.

Davis v. Stamler

494 F. Supp. 339 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 1980

Pickett the resignation of his presidency of the board of trustees, the remaining trustees requested that Mr. … See American Roller Co. v. Budinger, 513 F.2d 982, 984 (3rd Cir. 1975); Renshaw v. Ravert, 460 F.Supp. 1089, 1092 (E.D.Pa.1978); Baglini v.

United States v. Whelan

456 F. Supp. 744 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 23, 1978

S. v. … S. v.

United States v. Simone

627 F. Supp. 1264 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 30, 1986

United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 576 , 96 S.Ct. 1768, 1776 , 48 L.Ed.2d 212 (1976). Since it is “only from the mouths of those having knowledge of the [events] that the facts can be ascertained,” Brown v. … Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1957) (grand jury inquired into matters not within its competence); United States v.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc.

519 F. Supp. 1266 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 6, 1981

The Appeal Board reversed the determination of the ALJ. … Although, of course, the holding of the Appeal Board is not binding upon this court, judicial economy is admirably served by adopting the Appeal Board’s reasoning.

SC Holdings, Inc. v. A.A.A. Realty Co.

935 F. Supp. 1354 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 16, 1996

Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 33 F.3d 96, 103 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1176 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1128 (1995); Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. … Co., 917 F.Supp. 1173, 1182 (N.D.Ohio 1996); Sun Co., Inc v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 919 F.Supp. 1523 (N.D.Okla.1996); Reynolds Metals Co. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 920 F.Supp. 991 (E.D.Ark.1996); Saco Steel Co. v.

United Transportation Union Local 759 v. Orange Newark Elizabeth Bus, Inc.

111 F. Supp. 2d 514 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 22, 2000

Co. v. Settle, 260 U.S. 166 , 43 S.Ct. 28 , 67 L.Ed. 189 ); see also Walling v. … Thomas v.

BROWNE v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 9, 2023

Previously, I dismissed Browne’s claims for lack of Article III standing and ordered that the case be remanded to the state court. See Browne v. … Pullman Co. v. Jenkins, 305 U.S. 534, 537 (1939). Removal is “strictly construed, with all doubts to be resolved in favor of remand.” Brown v. JEVIC, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009); see also Samuel-Bassett v.

Shinn v. Encore Mortgage Services, Inc.

96 F. Supp. 2d 419 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 8, 2000

See Williams v. … Mart Co. v. United Food and Intern.

Juan v. Rafferty

577 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 5, 1984

They argue that a disciplinary hearing officer performs a quasi-judicial function as do parole boards, and is therefore entitled to absolute immunity as are these boards. See Franklin v. … Butz v.