Case law

BURKE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 15, 2025

Hedges v. United States, 404 F.3d 744, 750 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir. 1991)). ? … Hurley, 174 F.3d at 126 (quoting Failla v.

BROWNING v. YOUNG

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 15, 2021

May. 6, 2019) (“Browning I”); Browning v. Grant, Civ. A. No. 20-01587 (D.N.J. Feb. 13, 2020) (“Browning II”). … See Grayson v.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Local 456, of International Union of Electrical & Radio, Machine Workers

135 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 7, 1955

They cite Direct Transit Lines v. Local Union No. 406, 6 Cir., 1952, 199 F.2d 89 ; S. E. Overton Co. v. International Brotherhood, etc., D.C.Mich.1953, 115 F.Supp. 764 ; Pocahontas Terminal Corp. v. … Lock Joint Pipe Co. v. Anderson, D.C.Mo.1955, 127 F.Supp. 692 and American Optical Co. v. Andert, D.C., 108 F.Supp. 252, 254 .

In re Wilsonite Corp.

28 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 14, 1939

In rebuttal the Trustee argues that the case of New Jersey v. … This language is predicated upon the ruling in the case of City of Springfield v.

Naik v. Renaud

947 F. Supp. 2d 464 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 22, 2013

(8) What is the nature and scope of the Board’s jurisdiction over other aspects of the appeal? [Compl., Ex. 1.] … Org. v.

In re Stecker

271 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 10, 1966

Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963) ; Brown v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1952); Townsend v. *410 Sain, 372 U.S. 293 , 83 S.Ct. 745 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 770 (1962); Pike v. Dickson, supra.

SHAFFER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 19, 2025

See Brown, 649 F.3d at 196–97 (citations omitted). … Aug. 11, 2022) (citing Tonti v. Saul, No. 20-92, 2021 WL 518178, at *3 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2021); Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 19-2110, 2020 WL 1244186, at *5 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2020); O’Neill v. Comm’r of Soc.

Pilgrim Med. Gr. v. Njs Bd. of Med. E.

613 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 10, 1985

See Livingston v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners, 168 N.J.Super. 259 , 402 A.2d 967 (App.Div.), certif. den., 81 N.J. 406 , 408 A.2d 800 (1979). … State Board of Equalization, 715 F.2d 522, 527 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1593 , 80 L.Ed.2d 125 (1984); Ada-Cascade, supra, 720 F.2d at 903 ; Evans v.

CENTENNIAL PLAZA PROP, LLC v. TRANE U.S. INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 17, 2025

See, e.g., United States v. Dupree, 617 F.3d 724, 727-28 (3d Cir. 2010); see also Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, 777 F. … with the Board’s consent). 17(c) (same).

Blakey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

2 F. Supp. 2d 598 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 9, 1998

See, e.g., Romano v. Brown & Williamson, Kenney Cert., Exh. Q (compensating law clerk time at $60/hour); Wolak v. Borough of Matawan, Kenney Cert., Exh. S (compensating paralegal time at $60/hour); Hurley v. … Haddonfield Board of Education, 769 F.Supp. 1313, 1323 (D.N.J.1991) (reducing lodestar by 50% for lack of overall success); Scales v. J.C.

Fair Housing Council of Bergen County, Inc. v. Eastern Bergen County Multiple Listing Service, Inc.

422 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 22, 1976

Johnson v. Decker, 333 F.Supp. 88 (N.D.Cal.1971); McLaurin v. Brusturis, 320 F.Supp. 190 (E.D.Wis.1970); Brown v. LoDuca, 307 F.Supp. 102 (E.D.Wis.1969); Colon v. … Compare, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). See Rite Aid v. Board of Pharmacy, 421 F.Supp. 1161 (D.N.J.1976) (three-judge court) (Stern, J., dissenting). Nothing in Rizzo v.

Christmas v. City of Asbury Park

10 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 8, 1935

Board of Com’rs of Chaffee County v. Potter, 142 U. S. 355 , 12 S. Ct. 216, 219 , 35 L. Ed. 1040 ; Board of Com’rs of Gunnison County v. E. H. Rollins & Sons, 173 U. S. 255 , 19 S. Ct. 390 , 43 L. … Town of Coloma v. Eaves, 92 U. S. 484 [ 23 L. Ed. 579 ]; Town of Venice v. Murdock, 92 U. S. 494 [ 23 L. Ed. 583 ]; Marcy v. Township of Oswego, 92 U. S. 637 [ 23 L. Ed. 748 ]; Wilson v. Salamanca, 99 U. S. 499 [ 25 L.

Thomas v. Dietz

518 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 16, 1981

Thomas, a prisoner incarcerated in the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton, against Christopher Dietz, Chairman of the New Jersey State Parole Board. … In Wolff v.

Rodin Properties-Shore Mall, N v. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.

49 F. Supp. 2d 728 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 5, 1999

See Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. … The Crossclaim states that N.V. had a Board of Supervisory Directors, but the only information offered regarding the Board’s composition is the fact that Rodin and Leo Ullman 3 served on the Board. See id., ¶¶ 49, 52.

The Frank Vanberkerchen

87 F. 763 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 20, 1898

Jennings v. Carson, 4 Cranch, 25 , 26; U. S. v. Ames, 99 U. S. 35 . … No. 12,068, his honor, Judge, Brown, sitting in admiralty in the Bouthern district of New York, where the same practice prevails of accepting stipulation upon notice of filing libel and without issuing monition, held “that

United States ex rel. Harrington v. McCandless

43 F.2d 760 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 1930

Claussen v. Day, 279 U. S. 398 , 49 S. Ct. 354 , 73 L. Ed. 758 ; United States ex rel. Rios v. Day (C. C. A. 2). 24 F.(2d) 654 ; United States ex rel. Bardakos v. Mudd (D. C. Md.) 33 F.(2d) 334 . … Rios v. Day (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 654 , supra; United States ex rel. Bardakos v. Mudd (D. C.) 33 F.(2d) 334 .

PARRISH v. GREUNER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 2025

See Lujan v. … Trust v. Withumsmith Brown, P.C., 692 F.3d 283, 287 (3d Cir. 2012) and Estate of Allen v. Cumberland County, 262 F.

Juan v. Rafferty

577 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 5, 1984

They argue that a disciplinary hearing officer performs a quasi-judicial function as do parole boards, and is therefore entitled to absolute immunity as are these boards. See Franklin v. … Butz v.

Moore v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

198 F. Supp. 3d 385 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 27, 2016

See, e.g., Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 3 Cranch 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806); Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185 , 110 S.Ct. 1015 , 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990); Lincoln Prop. Co. v. … Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 724 F.3d 337, 346 (3d Cir.2013) (citing Grand Union Supermarkets of the Virgin Islands, Inc. v. H.E.

In re Michael J. Hughes & Co.

110 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 27, 1953

See Herman v. Brickman, Super.Ct.App.Div.1950, 8 N.J.Super. 204 , 73 A.2d 730 . The present facts call for - an application . of this general. principle. … Particularly pertinent is the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in Murphy v. W. H. & F. W. Cane, Inc., E. & A. 1912, 82 N.J.L. 557 , 82 A. 854 .