Case law

United States v. Norwood

939 F. Supp. 1132 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 6, 1996

In Daubert v. … In United States v.

United States v. 13,255.53 Acres of Land in Burlington & Ocean Counties

53 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 8, 1943

Upon return of the show cause order, Gertrude Brown, Lloyd Davis, Stanley Davis, Leon A. Davis, Elvin H. … In the case of Foulke v.

WANAQUE REALTY v. BOROUGH OF WANAQUE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 12, 2025

Brown, Jr. (DSMF ¶ 68.) … Brown v. Phillip Morris Inc, 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001).

Santos v. Bush

874 F. Supp. 2d 408 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 14, 2012

Several hours later, a nurse at EJSP made a note in Plaintiffs chart for “strange behavior” because Plaintiff was sitting on his bed with a “brown paper bag over his head.” (Ex. … (citation omitted); see also Singletary v. Pa.

Vail v. Pan Am Corp.

752 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 27, 1990

See Anderson v. USAir, Inc., 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Hingson v. Pacific Southwest Airlines, 743 F.2d 1408 (9th Cir.1984); Diefenthal v. … Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10-11 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846-2847 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983) (quoting Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v.

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Whitman

136 F. Supp. 2d 343 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 22, 2001

(quoting Maine v. Taylor, 477 U.S. 131, 138 , 106 S.Ct. 2440 , 91 L.Ed.2d 110 (1986)); Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 579 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 , 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986). … Brown-Forman, 476 U.S. at 579 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 ; Old Coach, 881 F.2d at 1231, Norfolk S. Corp. v. Oberly, 822 F.2d 388 , 398-401 (3d Cir.1987).

P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.

47 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 30, 1999

Once plaintiffs were removed from office, the board terminated them as employees as well. … See, e.g., Banter v.

North Arlington Nat. Bank v. Kearny Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

92 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 12, 1950

Empire Trust Co. v. Board of Commerce and Navigation 124 N.J.L. 406 , 11 A.2d 752 , at page 754. The plaintiff here does not, nor can it claim, an exclusive right to transact business in a given territory. … The reasoning on these points is found in Alabama Power Co. v.

Del Gizzo v. United States Postal Service

575 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 24, 1983

Thus, plaintiff had no choice but to appeal an adverse action by the Postal Service to the Merit System Protection Board. … That path leads from the Postal Service to the Merit System Protection Board to the Courts of Appeal.

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Borough of Milltown

93 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 17, 1950

In Frederick Hart & Co. v. … Leigh v. Barnhart, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 279 , U. S. v. Bernauer, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 400 . As pointed out by Judge Smith of this court in Rolle Mfg. Co., Inc. v.

BG BY FG v. Cranford Bd. of Educ.

702 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 29, 1988

Board of Education, 774 F.2d 575, 578 (3d Cir.1985) (quoting D.S. v. Board of Education, 188 N.J. … As noted by Judge Gibbons in Board of Education v.

Crown Clothing Co. v. Papale

854 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 1994

See Genesco, Inc. v. … NLRB v. California Horse Racing Board, 940 F.2d 536, 540 (9th Cir.1991). These include cases involving allegations of NLRB abuse, see Leedom v.

Mosca v. Cole

384 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 25, 2005

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); see also Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … v.

United States v. Bertoli

854 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1994

It alleged that, in about March 1983, Bertoli became the promoter of High Tech, whereby he founded High Tech, appointed its officers, board of directors and advisory board, allocated the distribution of its securities and … However, under United States v. Brown, 583 F.2d 659 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied sub nom., Greenblatt v.

California Natural, Inc. v. Nestle Holdings, Inc.

631 F. Supp. 465 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 31, 1986

After the parties signed the Letter of Intent, CNI’s Board of Directors met to discuss the “ongoing negotiations to sell the [CNI] assets” to Nestle. … Minutes of Meeting of [CNI] Board of Directors, December 8, 1983, Marked as Defendants’ Exhibit “Flynn-172.”

United States v. McIntire

370 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 20, 1974

See, e. g., Pan American Petroleum and Transport Co., 273 U.S. 456, 506-507 , 47 S.Ct. 416 , 71 L.Ed. 734 (1926); NLRB v. Kingston Cake Co., 206 F.2d 604, 611 (3d Cir. 1953) ; United States v. … Section 1(1) provides in part: The establishment and use of broadcasting stations ... on board ships, aircraft or any other floating or airborne objects outside national territories is prohibited. 3 .

American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Sidamon-Eristoff

755 F. Supp. 2d 556 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 14, 2011

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Pataki, 320 F.3d 200, 208-09 (2d Cir.2003) (citations omitted); see also Pac. Northwest Venison Producers v. … For support, Plaintiffs rely on the Supreme Court’s decisión in Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc., 491 U.S. 324, 336 , 109 S.Ct. 2491 , 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989) and Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y.

Pullman-Peabody Co. v. Joy Manufacturing Co.

662 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 9, 1986

In Gulf Corp. v. … Conclusory allegations of director wrongdoing will not excuse demand, nor will the mere approval of directors of purportedly injurious acts, absent self-interest or bias by the majority or the board. Lewis v.

Brennan v. William Paterson College

34 F. Supp. 3d 416 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 23, 2014

But see Nannay v. … See Kovats v.

Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.

532 F. Supp. 1068 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 2, 1980

At the time the motion was filed, an appeal to the Board of Appeals of the Patent and Trademark Office had been briefed and argued. This is an alternative method for dealing with the issue of validity, see PIC, Inc. v. … Zachry Co. v. O’Brien, 378 F.2d 423 (CA 10, 1967); and Maryland v. Hatch, 198 F.Supp. 1 (D.Conn.1961).