Case law

Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.

811 F. Supp. 1025 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 7, 1993

(“Primerica”), the Board of Directors of Primerica (the “Board of Directors”), James Dimon (“Dimon”), Irwin Ettinger (“Ettinger”), John Fowler (“Fowler”) and ABC (the “ABC”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). 1 Plaintiffs … (quoting Crowley v.

ACADEMY HILL, INC. v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 6, 2020

Lee v. Brown, 178 A.3d 701, 709 (N.J. 2018) (citing N.J. Stat. Ann, § 59:1-2). … Glover v. F. D.LC., 698 F.3d 139, 145-46 (3d Cir. 2012) (quoting Baldwin Cty. Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3 (1984)).

Brennan v. State of New Jersey

364 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 1973

In Schultz v. Hinojosa, 432 F.2d 259, 267 (5th Cir. 1970), the Court held that the term “other facilities” should “be considered as being in pari materia with the preceding words ‘board and lodging’ ”. … Those who follow the teachings of Kirschbaum v.

First Puerto Rican Festival of New Jersey, Inc. v. City of Vineland

108 F. Supp. 2d 392 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 15, 1998

Plaintiff at least cites Elrod v. … Borough of Palmyra Board of Education v. F.C., 2 F.Supp.2d 637, 645-46 (D.N.J. 1998). I find that Plaintiff cannot afford such a bond. See, e.g., Negron Aff. ¶ 20.

Empire Box Corp. v. Willard Sulzberger Motor Co.

104 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 6, 1952

Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 240, 241 , 57 S.Ct. 461 , 81 L.Ed. 617 ; Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp., 10 Cir., 190 F.2d 985, 989 ; Motor Terminals v. … United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, D.C., 95 F.Supp. 375 ; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Isner, D.C., 92 F.Supp. 582 ; Interstate Commerce Commission v. F. & F.

Crow-New Jersey 32 Ltd. Partnership v. Township of Clinton

718 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 28, 1989

Overlook Terrace Management Corp. v. Rent Control Board of West New York, 71 N.J. 451 , 366 A.2d 321 (1976). … Pop Realty Corp. v. Springfield Board of Adjustment of Springfield Township, 176 N.J.Super. 441 , 423 A.2d 688 (Law Div.1980).

Ryan v. Liss, Tenner & Goldberg Securities Corp.

683 F. Supp. 480 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 8, 1988

Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 81 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 896 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984); See also Middlesex County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. … Plaintiff’s discussion of Mowbray v.

Toscony Provision Co., Inc. v. Block

538 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 3, 1982

Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling and Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501, 505 , 83 L.Ed. 660 . ( 340 U.S. at 477 , 71 S.Ct. at 459 ). In Bowman Transportation v.

Santos v. Bush

874 F. Supp. 2d 408 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 14, 2012

Several hours later, a nurse at EJSP made a note in Plaintiffs chart for “strange behavior” because Plaintiff was sitting on his bed with a “brown paper bag over his head.” (Ex. … (citation omitted); see also Singletary v. Pa.

Kay v. General Cable Corp.

63 F. Supp. 791 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 4, 1946

Kay v. General Cable Corporation, 3 Cir., 144 F.2d 653 . Thereafter, in accordance with the mandate of the Circuit Court, an ex parte order was entered. … On application of the defendant, this Court, after a hearing, vacated the order and in an opinion rendered on March 5, 1945 (Kay v.

Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.

819 F. Supp. 1296 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 25, 1993

(“Primerica”), the Board of Directors of Primerica (the “Board of Directors”), James Dimon (“Dimon”), Irwin Ettinger (“Ettinger”), John Fowler (“Fowler”) and ABC (“ABC”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). 1 Plaintiffs brought … Board of Regents, 697 F.2d 928, 934 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 826 , 104 S.Ct. 97 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983); see also Granfinanciera, S.A v.

DAVIS v. NABIL KASSEM & ASSOCIATES

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 20, 2022

App’x 91, 95 (3d Cir. 2016) (affirming grant of summary judgment on Section 1983 claim against “the appointed lawyers who represented [the plaintiff] in criminal proceedings” because they were not state actors); Brown v … v.

Giordano v. MacK Trucks, Inc.

203 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 12, 1962

The determination of whether a union is the exclusive collective bargaining representative is a matter not for this court but for the National Labor Relations Board. See Fur Workers Union, Local No. 72 v. … United Steelworkers of America v. American Mfg.

Levin v. Manning

124 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 26, 1952

The common-law concepts governing the determination of independent contractor or employee are excellently stated by Judge Goodrich in National Labor Relations Board v. Nu-Car Carriers, 3 Cir., 1951, 189 F.2d 756 . … Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 1943, 135 F.2d 715, 717 .” See National Labor Relations Board v. Nu-Car Carriers, supra, 189 F.2d at page 757 .

United States v. Mogavera

535 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 8, 1982

S. v. Salerno (Silver-man), 538 F.2d 1005 (CA 3, 1976), reh. den. 542 F.2d 628 (CA 3, 1976) (a former § 4208(a)(2) sentence); U. S. v. Somers, 552 F.2d 108 (CA 3, 1977) (also a § 4208(a)(2) sentence); U. S. v. … Addonizio v. U. S., 573 F.2d 147 (CA 3, 1978).

United States v. Norwood

939 F. Supp. 1132 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 6, 1996

In Daubert v. … In United States v.

Deal v. Velez

244 F. Supp. 3d 435 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 20, 2017

Price v. … of Social Services ("BCBOSS”), and Ronald Yulick, Adult Medicaid Supervisor, Burlington County Board of Social Services (collectively "the State” or "Defendants”).

Display Works, LLC v. Bartley

182 F. Supp. 3d 166 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 25, 2016

Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 814 F.3d 619, 637 (2d Cir.2016) (internal citations omitted). … Brown, 814 F.3d at 639 . The Court agrees with this conclusion. 4 The alternative is untenable.

WRIGHT-PHILLIPS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 1, 2021

But the Third Circuit has twice explained in dicta that “only state actors can be sued under the ‘full and equal benefit’ clause,” Brown v. … Indeed, courts in this Circuit continue to apply this principle from Brown and Mahone. Wright v. Reed, No. 20-cv-02664, 2021 WL 912521, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2021); Moore v. Solanco Sch. Dist., 471 F.

Vail v. Pan Am Corp.

752 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 27, 1990

See Anderson v. USAir, Inc., 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Hingson v. Pacific Southwest Airlines, 743 F.2d 1408 (9th Cir.1984); Diefenthal v. … Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10-11 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846-2847 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983) (quoting Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v.