Case law

United States v. Schautz

65 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 22, 1946

The defendants assert that under the case of United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co., 255 U.S. 81 , 41 S.Ct. 298 , 65 L. … United States v. Doherty, D.C., 27 F. 730 . Action inconsistent with this declaration, and otherwise performed, would be subject to redress in the Courts.

Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. Duffy

273 F. 197 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 31, 1921

two interests their recommendation * * * he carried out”; that before any of such stock had been issued to- plaintiff “in pursuance of the reservation of authority to modify or change the said agreement” as plaintiff’s board … Gibbons v. Mahon, 1. 36 U. S. 549 , 10 Sup. Ct. 1057, 34 L. Ed. 525 ; Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. Co., 205 U. S. 364 , 27 Sup. Ct. 513, 51 L. Ed. 841 ; Lynch v. Hornby, 247 U. S. 339 -344, 38 Sup.

FAILLA v. GEORGE'S FOODS, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 6, 2023

Kannankeril v. … Tuato v. Brown, 85 F. App’x 674, 677 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003).

Abramson v. Japan Air Lines

587 F. Supp. 1099 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 11, 1983

See Prager v. American Broadcasting Co., 569 F.Supp. 1229 (D-N.J., 1983) aff'd 734 F.2d 7 (CA3 1984), and cases cited, particularly Kotlikoff v. The Community News, 89 N.J. 62 , 444 A.2d 1086 (1982); Maressa v. … Conclusions De Marines v. KLM, etc., 580 F.2d 1193 (CA-3, 1978), and Warshaw v.

Burke v. Quartey

969 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 7, 1997

For instance, the Legislature has provided for the regulation of boxing through the State Athletic Control Board (hereinafter “Board”). See N.J. Stat. … Compare Nieminen v.

Naporano v. United States

834 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 1, 1993

v. … Board of Police Comm’rs of Metro. Police Dep’t, 920 F.2d 1402 , 1405-06 (8th Cir.1990) (when “unresolved issues are primarily legal rather than factual, summary judgment is particularly appropriate”). B.

Schonewolf v. Callahan

972 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 22, 1997

. §§ 405 (g), 1383(c)(3); Williams v. Sullivan, 970 F.2d 1178, 1182 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1294 , 122 L.Ed.2d 685 (1993); Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir.1988); Doak v. … See Brown, 845 F.2d at 1213 . Thus, substantial evidence may be slightly less than a preponderance. Hanusiewicz v. Bowen, 678 F.Supp. 474, 476 (D.N.J.1988).

DOE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 2026

See Smith v. … See Williams v. Gavin, 640 F.

Marzacco v. Lowe

58 F. Supp. 900 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 12, 1945

Chief Justice Hughes in Crowell v. … In May of 1944 an opinion in the case of Bernatowicz v.

Waters v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

158 F. Supp. 2d 415 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 14, 2001

That case, Sidhu v. … Pacific Southwest Airlines, 743 F.2d 1408, 1412 (9th Cir.1984) (court implied private right of action for discriminatory boarding and seating practices); Polansky v.

Ingenito v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF NJ

568 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 19, 1983

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); and Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557-58 , 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2975-76 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). … See Clark v.

United States v. Ninety-Five Boxes

27 F. Cas. 171 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 21, 1874

Waring v. Mayor, 8 Wall. [75 U. S.] 118; Act 1700, § .30. The goods were seized before an entry was attempted to be made. … S. v.

Mruz v. Caring, Inc.

991 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 28, 1998

Underland (“Ann Un-derland”), is a member of one or more of the boards of trustees or directors of the CARING Corporations, and the person who chose board members. Id. at ¶20 . … Lamar v.

Simmermon v. Gabbianelli

865 F. Supp. 2d 589 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2012

See Board of Trustees v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 570 n. 7, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); see also Alvin v.

National State Bank, Elizabeth, NJ v. Long

469 F. Supp. 1068 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 12, 1979

McClellan v. Chipman, 164 U.S. 347, 357 , 17 S.Ct. 85, 87 , 41 L.Ed. 461 (1896). Accord, e. g., Anderson National Bank v. Luckett, 321 U.S. 233, 248 , 64 S.Ct. 599 , 88 L.Ed. 692 (1944); Davis v. … Marquette National Bank v.

Schneider v. Duffy

43 F.2d 642 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 17, 1930

Stevenson v. Shalcross (C. C. A.) 205 F. 289 . Hendrie v. Sayles, 98 U. S. 549 , 25 L. … S. v. Board (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 459 ; Jones Syndicate v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 23 F.(2d) 833 ; U. S. v. Klausner (C. C. A.) 25 F.(.2d) 608.

KAPLOW v. PORT POLICE & GUARDS UNION LOCAL 1456

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 12, 2023

Brown had reported that Plaintiff was harassing Brown and told him that Plaintiff had left his post. (Id. ¶ 44.) Plaintiff then explained that it was Brown who was threatening violence against Plaintiff. … (citing Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 24, 103 (1983)).

Humidity Control Co. v. Mengel Body Co.

13 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 23, 1935

“Solving these simultaneous equations for v, we find that: (18) v = 64,813.9 board feet. … “The value of v just obtained is the advantage in board feet derived from the use of one Cyelspray for one month— or in one Cyclspray-month.

Stehney v. Perry

907 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 6, 1995

Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d 1399, 1404-05 (9th Cir.1990) (Kozinski, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1104 , 113 L.Ed.2d 214 (1991); see also New York Times v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571 , *821 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). According to the Supreme Court, “it should be obvious that no one has a ‘right’ to a security clearance.”

Kiareldeen v. Reno

92 F. Supp. 2d 403 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 11, 2000

On October 15, 1999, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed the INS’ appeal of the adjustment of status issue, but stayed its decision until October 29, 1999; and on October 20, 1999, the Board dismissed the agency’s … See Sandoval v. Reno, 166 F.3d 225 (3rd Cir.1999); Catney v. INS, 178 F.3d 190 (3rd Cir.1999); Liang v. INS, 2000 WL 264216 , at *8 (3rd Cir.