Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

2.23s

  • United States v. Cannistraro

    694 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 18, 1988

    See SEC v. American Board of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 438 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988); SEC v. Investors Security Corp., 560 F.2d 561, 567 (3d Cir. 1977); SEC v. … FTC v. H.N.

    Vacated by United States v. Cannistraro, Richard, 871 F.2d 1210 (1989)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Tard

    593 F. Supp. 1091 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 14, 1984

    In Mullaney v. … Accord, Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 at 206 , 97 S.Ct. 2319 at 2325 , 53 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977). 4 Applying the holding of Mullaney v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fox & Lazo-Atlantic Commercial Group, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    862 F. Supp. 1233 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1994

    Plaintiffs reliance on Beener v. … Id.; see also Agri Export Co-op. v. Universal Sav.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barr v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.

    242 F.R.D. 287 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 3, 2007

    The board did not vote on this issue because eight of the nine board members elected to exchange their options for cash. (Id. at 70:4-71:11). … Due to this conflict, the Board delegated the decision to Steven Crown, the only member of the Board who had not elected to exchange his options for cash. (Id.).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • The Imogene M. Terry

    19 F. 463 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 2, 1884

    The Orleans v. Phœbus, 11 Pet. 175 . … Ray-nor as if he had remained on board the Barker. The same attempt was made to charge him with the cost of his grub, over throe dollars per week, that was sought to be imposed on the other men.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Love v. Johns-Manville Canada, Inc.

    609 F. Supp. 1457 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 29, 1985

    See, e.g., Brown v. … State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969); England v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bollitier v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    735 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 8, 1989

    In Hall v. … Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The America

    136 F. 510 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 23, 1905

    There was no one on board to care for her. She had no steam. Her pilot house had already been scorched by the heat. … In Wilson v. Winchester (C. C.) 30 Fed. 204 , the libelant’s tug towed a schooner away from a pier near which certain oil works were in .flames, and an award of $200 for salvage services was made. In The Rose (D.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Artis v. U.S. Department of Justice

    166 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 18, 2001

    Stewart v. United States Board of Parole, 285 F.2d 421, 421-22 (10th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 862 , 81 S.Ct. 830 , 5 L.Ed.2d 825 (1961). … Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950). This requirement for “some kind of a hearing,” Board of Regents v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Sugar Refining Co. v. Rutan

    123 F. 979 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 4, 1903

    All of these issues (except that respecting dividends) were presented to the United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in the case of the Spreckels Sugar Refining Company v. … They obtained no right to do so until the board of directors had ordered its payment to them, as stockholders, in the way of a dividend.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DOE

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 2026

    See Smith v. … See Williams v. Gavin, 640 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kaudern v. Allstate Insurance Company

    277 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 17, 1967

    The third element set forth in Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co., supra, was the failure of the insurer to properly investigate the circumstances involved in the accident. … See also Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co., 155 Cal.App.2d 679 , 319 P.2d 69 (Dist.Ct.App.Cal.1957), Younger v. Lumberman’s Mut. Ins. Co., 174 So.2d 672 (Ct.App.La.1965).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • SecuraComm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.

    984 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 21, 1997

    He was questioned about Walker’s search and destroy policy and stated that it was adopted by the Board at a meeting attended by all Board members. … Am-Brit, Inc. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by a later decision, 166 F.3d 182 (1999)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

    104 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 18, 1952

    Record-graph Corp., 3 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 580 , Reynolds Metals Co. v. … See also Johnson v. R. F. C., D.C.Tenn. 1950, 94 F.Supp. 214 ; Haberle v. R. F. C., D.C.D.C.1951, 104 F.Supp. 636 ; Scotia Mining Co. v. R. F. C. (1948) 3 App. Board O.C.S. No. 195, p. 52.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • CUSTIN v. WIRTHS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 25, 2020

    One such context is review of local zoning board decisions. See, e.g., Koynock v. Lloyd, 405 F. App’x 679 (3d Cir. 2011); DeBlasio v. … Brown v. Camden Cnty. Bd. of Soc. Servs., 704 F. App’x 204, 206 (3d Cir. 2017)10.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bellocchio v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

    16 F. Supp. 3d 367 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 15, 2014

    Without an accurate citation, the Court is unable to consider "Brown v Settlement School District” and "Hallowich v Range Resource.” . 49 U.S.C. § 46110 (a) provides in pertinent part: [A] person disclosing a substantial … Turbe v. Gov’t of the Virgin Islands, 938 F.2d 427, 428 (3d Cir.1991). . Plaintiffs allege that "[w]e attended several Board of Director meetings requesting help to repair our area and were denied assistance.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • New Jersey v. United States

    168 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 25, 1958

    This case (Erie case) was heard together with that of State of New Jersey v. United States of America, D.C., 168 F.Supp. 324 (N. Y. Central case) on November 3, 1958. … Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey v. United States of America, 1957, 158 F.Supp. 104 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leonen v. Johns-Manville Corp.

    717 F. Supp. 272 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 5, 1989

    In Nappe v. … Defendants have moved, in the alternative, for a stay pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Browning-Ferris Indus. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. Nieves

    762 F. Supp. 617 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 9, 1991

    See Migra, 465 U.S. at 75 , 104 S.Ct. at 892 ; Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. v. Brown, 732 F.2d 345 (3d Cir.1984). Claim and issue preclusion are “related but independent preclusion concepts.” … Melikian, 791 F.2d at 277 (citing New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Board of Higher Education, 654 F.2d 868, 876 (3d Cir.1981)); State v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Liberty Ins. Corp. v. Tinplate Purchasing Corp.

    743 F. Supp. 2d 406 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 6, 2010

    Co. v. … In North Plain-field, the insured Board of Education (the “Board”) hired a contractor to renovate several schools. 2008 WL 2074013 , at *2.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.