Case law

Spencer Bank, SLA v. Seidman

528 F. Supp. 2d 494 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 3, 2008

Co. v. M/V Cape Fear, 967 F.2d 864, 866 (3d Cir.1992) (quotation omitted)). … (quoting California v.

Kennedy v. American Airlines Inc.

195 F. Supp. 3d 646 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 20, 2016

board determinations. … In other words, the RLA subjects minor disputes “to a compulsory and binding arbitration before an adjustment board,” Int’l Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. U.S.

Germanio v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

732 F. Supp. 1297 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 26, 1990

In Browning-Ferris Industries v. … Browning-Ferris, 109 S.Ct. at 2916-2918 .

Ward v. Village of Ridgewood

531 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 25, 1982

Trial was had on the basis of the testimonial record before the Planning Board and the various exhibits including the Board’s denials, the amended ordinance, and the like. … See the opinion of Chief Justice Beasley in Dufford v. Decue, 31 N.J.L. 302 (Sup.1865), and Flanagan v. Treasurer, etc. 44 N.J.L. 118 (Sup.1882); Flanigan v.

United States v. Badalamenti

394 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 15, 1975

See United States v. Crispino, 392 F.Supp. 764 (S.D.N.Y.1975); United States v. Brown, 389 F.Supp. 959 (S.D.N.Y.1974); Sandello v. Curran, M 11-188 (S.D.N.Y. 1974). … United States v. Brown, supra-, United States v. Weiner, supra. See also, In re DiGirlomo, 392 F.Supp. 997 (W.D.Mo., 1975).

Dalton, Dalton, Little, Inc. v. Mirandi

412 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 19, 1976

That case is Dane v. Brown, 70 F.2d 164 (C.A.1, 1934). Brown was a Massachusetts architect. He contracted to design a house for Mrs. Dane in New Jersey, and supervise the construction. He did the work but was not paid. … The trial court entered judgment for Brown, and Mrs. Dane appealed.

Acosta v. Gaffney

413 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 12, 1976

Plaintiffs waived appeal (to the Board of Immigration Appeals). 10. … See, e. g, Perdido v. INS, 420 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir. 1969); Faustino v. INS, 432 F.2d 429 (2nd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 921 , 91 S.Ct. 909 , 27 L.Ed.2d 824 (1971); Enciso-Cardozo v.

Sparano v. Secretary of Army

577 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 26, 1982

This is a review of a decision by the Army Board For Correction of Military Records. (Board). The jurisdiction of the District Court to review a Military Board has been clearly established within this circuit Ragoni v. … U.S., 424 F.2d 261, 263 (CA3, 1970), Neal v. Sec of Navy, 639 F.2d 1029 (CA3, 1981).

Saldana v. City of Camden

727 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 21, 1989

Louis v. … Pembaur v. Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483 , 106 S.Ct. 1292, 1300 , 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986); see Oklahoma City v.

Barr v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.

242 F.R.D. 287 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 3, 2007

The board did not vote on this issue because eight of the nine board members elected to exchange their options for cash. (Id. at 70:4-71:11). … Due to this conflict, the Board delegated the decision to Steven Crown, the only member of the Board who had not elected to exchange his options for cash. (Id.).

Isko v. Engelhard Corp.

367 F. Supp. 2d 702 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 29, 2005

.”); Moore v. … See Goldstein v.

Bryson v. Diocese of Camden

909 F. Supp. 2d 364 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 14, 2012

Defendant acknowledges that the Supreme Court of New Jersey held a boarding school to be in loco parentis and “within the household” under the CSAA in Hardwicke v. Am. … See Hardwicke, 902 A.2d at 913 (finding that the boarding school “is a person under the passive abuse provision of the CSAA”), Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J v.

Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. Clark & Clark

62 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 1, 1945

Co. v. … A similar argument was presented in Wolf Bros. & Co. v. *1005 Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 8 Cir., 206 F. 611, 617 .

The Emma B

140 F. 771 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 8, 1906

But, granting this, the respondent still claims that this court has no jurisdiction in respect to the accounting asked for by the libel, and cites The Orleans v. Phoebus, 11 Pet. 175 , 9 L. Ed. 677 , and Ward v. … No. 8,152; Davis v. Child et al., Fed. Cas. No. 3,628; Tunno et al. v. The Betsina, Fed. Cas. No. 14,236; The H. E. Willard (C. C.) 52 Fed. 387 . See, also, Benedict on Admiralty, § 263a; Hughes on Admiralty, § 189.

United States v. Myers

700 F. Supp. 1358 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 3, 1988

As the Court stated in Brown v. … Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. at 51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640 (emphasis added) (citations omitted). The requisite reasonable suspicion must be objectively gauged.

The Imogene M. Terry

19 F. 463 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 2, 1884

The Orleans v. Phœbus, 11 Pet. 175 . … Ray-nor as if he had remained on board the Barker. The same attempt was made to charge him with the cost of his grub, over throe dollars per week, that was sought to be imposed on the other men.

Wilson v. Tard

593 F. Supp. 1091 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 14, 1984

In Mullaney v. … Accord, Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 at 206 , 97 S.Ct. 2319 at 2325 , 53 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977). 4 Applying the holding of Mullaney v.

The America

136 F. 510 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 23, 1905

There was no one on board to care for her. She had no steam. Her pilot house had already been scorched by the heat. … In Wilson v. Winchester (C. C.) 30 Fed. 204 , the libelant’s tug towed a schooner away from a pier near which certain oil works were in .flames, and an award of $200 for salvage services was made. In The Rose (D.

Fox & Lazo-Atlantic Commercial Group, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.

862 F. Supp. 1233 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1994

Plaintiffs reliance on Beener v. … Id.; see also Agri Export Co-op. v. Universal Sav.

SecuraComm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.

984 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 21, 1997

He was questioned about Walker’s search and destroy policy and stated that it was adopted by the Board at a meeting attended by all Board members. … Am-Brit, Inc. v.