Case law

Lehigh Valley R. v. Martin

19 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 14, 1936

United States Railroad Labor Board, 261 U.S. 72 , 43 S.Ct. 278 , 67 L.Ed. 536 ; United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. R. … From this difference between regulatory orders of administrative boards or commissions, which constitute action, compare Prentis v.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Moskowitz

946 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 2, 1996

Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991); Schoch v. … By submitting the Marotta affidavit and the Board’s minutes, the RTC has raised questions concerning the underlying facts each had that cannot be resolved via summary judgment. Resolution Trust Corp. v.

GREENMAN v. CITY OF HACKENSACK

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 9, 2021

Greenman was appointed by the Mayor to be his liaison to the library board and attended most library board meetings. … Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 293 (3d Cir. 2009).

Bolger v. First State Financial Services

759 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 14, 1991

Bolger was advised he would be notified of the decision of the Board after the Board had finished considering his demands. Id. … See also United States v.

United States v. Pollack

64 F. Supp. 554 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 21, 1946

The record also exhibits another affidavit sworn to on September 24 before the commissioner, by G V. Brown, a deputy marshal; but, as already stated, this is in no way mentioned in the warrant. … In Weeks v.

C.P.M. v. D'Ilio

916 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 21, 1996

Delay by the Board in Notifying C.P.M.’s Employer In determining whether the parole board’s contact with C.P.M.’s employer is improper, the court first turns to the language of the board’s own rules. See Troia v. … Winsett v.

White v. Mayor of Rahway

11 F. 853 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 24, 1881

This suit is brought by Stephen V. … Squire, Board of Finance.

Child Evangelism Fellowship of New Jersey, Inc. v. Stafford Township School District

233 F. Supp. 2d 647 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 10, 2002

School-Bulletin-Board Forum 13 The school district has no written policy on use of school bulletin boards. … Wak v.

Cinaglia v. Levin

258 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 11, 2003

Harel v. Rutgers, 5 F.Supp.2d 246, 272 (D.N.J.1998) (quoting Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … In City of Camden v. Kenny, supra, thxe Superior Court of New Jersey held that the Board was authorized by the Supervision Act to appoint and dismiss unclassified persons in managerial positions.

United States v. Sloat

56 F.2d 434 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 3, 1931

A. 9) 13 F.(2d) 325 , 326 and Brown v. Grimes, 74 Ind. App. 655 , 192 N. E. 483 . It appears that different principles of law apply to attorneys, depending upon the nature of their employment. … A digest of the collected cases on this point is contained in note to Gate City Building & Loan Association v. National Bank of Commerce, 27 L. R. A. 401. In the ease of Brown v.

Stanziale v. County of Monmouth

884 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 19, 1995

See also, Egloff v. … Because it was the execution of the Board’s policy which inflicted the injury, the Board is likewise responsible under § 1983. Monell v. Dep’t of Social Servcies, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978).

Cuneo v. Local 575, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

210 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 8, 1962

See Retail Fruit and Vegetable Clerks Union, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 1957, 249 F.2d 591 . … I am aware of, but distinguish the facts in McLeod, etc. v. Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, 2 Cir., 1962, 300 F.2d 237 .

Briarcliff v. Briarcliff Tenants Ass'n (In Re Briarcliff)

15 B.R. 864 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 30, 1981

This statute was upheld by the Supreme Court in Gillis v. California, 293 U.S. 62 , 55 S.Ct. 4 , 79 L.Ed. 199 (1934). … This issue came before the Second Circuit in Cullen v. Bowles, 148 F.2d 621 (2nd Cir. 1945) as it applied to rent control.

Shields v. Murphy

116 F.R.D. 600 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 4, 1987

See, e.g., Koppel v. … The Board appointed a special committee of the three independent directors to study the matter and report to the Board.

Weske v. Samsung Electronics, America, Inc.

42 F. Supp. 3d 599 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 27, 2014

See Wilson v. … In Clark v.

Cuneo v. UNITED SHOE WORKERS OF AMERICA, ETC.

181 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 26, 1960

CUNEO, Regional Director of the Twenty-second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. … Labor Board do not unduly delay the setting of a date for an election.

Hall v. United States

528 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 22, 1981

The rule of preclusion set out in Feres and noted in Brown , barring suits such as the instant proceeding, endures. Peluso v. United States, 474 F.2d 605 (3d Cir. 1973); see also Miller v. … The Stencel Court derives the importance of this factor from United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141, 145 , 99 L.Ed. 139 .

Green v. Yeager

223 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 13, 1963

Brown v. … Brown v.

Alpha Painting & Construction Co. v. Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania

208 F. Supp. 3d 607 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 23, 2016

Following the rejection of Alpha’s bid protest, at a public DRPA Board of Commissioners meeting on August 17, 2016, DRPA’s Board of Commissioners approved the recommendation of the DRPA’s Operations & Maintenance Committee … Robertson v. Cent.

FIRST STATE BANK OF HUDSON CTY. v. United States

471 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 2, 1978

Thompson, 293 F.Supp. 1307 (D-Ark., 1967); Newberg v. FSLIC, 317 F.Supp. 1104 (D-Ill., 1970); Moon v. Takisaki, 501 F.2d 389 (CA-9, 1974); United States v. … Neustadt, 366 U.S. 696 , 81 S.Ct. 1294 , 6 L.Ed.2d 614 (1961); Davis v. FDIC, 369 F.Supp. 277 (D-Colo., 1974); Falconi v. FDIC, 257 F.2d 287 (CA-3, 1958); Freeling v.