Case law

Freeman v. City of Hackensack

200 F. Supp. 2d 458 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 2002

See Brown v. … To the extent that plaintiff alleges she has been deprived of her liberty interests, see Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Berel Co. v. Sencit F/G McKinley Associates

710 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 3, 1989

Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 578-79 , 432 A.2d 493 (1981). See also Fox v. … See Rochinsky v. State of N.J. Dept. of Transp., 110 N.J. 399 , 410 n. 5, 541 A.2d 1029 (1988). See also Brown v. Brown, supra, 86 N.J. at 580 , 432 A.2d 493 .

United States v. Bleasby

153 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 18, 1957

Thereafter, on June 18, 1952, the fund was lodged in a safe deposit box in the Peoples Trust Company of Bergen County, a bank selected by the Board of Chosen Freeholders. … Gordon v. Campbell, 329 U.S. 362, 371 , 67 S.Ct. 340, 345 , 91 L.Ed. 348 ; United States v.

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

683 F. Supp. 1487 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 21, 1988

See, e.g., Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155, 174 , 484 A.2d 1234 (1984). … Hake v. Manchester Township, 98 N.J. 302, 311 , 486 A.2d 836 (1985) (citing both Brown and Evers); see Battista v.

Blass v. Weigel

85 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 29, 1949

State Board of Medical Examiners et al., C-10901. See New Jersey Chiropractic Association v. … Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 274 U.S. 720 , 47 S.Ct. 590 , 71 L.Ed. 1324 ; 4 Dr. Bloom, Dentist, v. Cruise, 288 U.S. 588 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 967 ; Semler v.

Atlantic City Municipal Utilities Authority v. Regional Administrator

616 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 27, 1985

Board reversed the regional determination. … In City of Manassas Park v.

Illinois National Insurance v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.

85 F. Supp. 3d 785 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 28, 2015

Brown, Jr. … Id. at *5. 5 *792 On August 3, 2011 the Third Circuit reversed Judge Brown’s decision. See Illinois National Ins. Co. v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc., 653 F.3d 225 (3d Cir.2011).

Schmidt v. Central Foundry Co.

218 F. 466 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 21, 1914

Co. v. Kinney, 68 Fed. 500 , 15 C. C. A. 531 (C. C. A. 6th Cir.). And in Gill v. United States, supra, where all the previous cases are reviewed, the principle was thus broadly stated by Mr. Justice Brown ( 160 U. … Justice Brown was then speaking of an abandonment of a right to a patent, rather than license to use a patented article.

DB Orban, Inc. v. Orbex International, Inc.

580 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 16, 1983

Darche Assoc. v. Beatrice Foods Co., 538 F.Supp. 429 (D-N.J., 1981), aff'd, CA 3, 1982, 676 F.2d 685 . … See, e.g., Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 (1922).

Graden v. Conexant Systems, Inc.

574 F. Supp. 2d 456 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 27, 2008

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1965 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). In Bell Atlantic v. … Pietrangelo v. NUI Corp., No. 04-3223, 2005 WL 1703200 , at *5 (D.N.J. July 20, 2005); see also Lockheed Corp. v.

United States v. Valenti

106 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 27, 1952

In Wolck v. … See Klapprott v. U. S., 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 . We are dealing with the term “affiliated” in the statute, the indictment and the form filed with the National Labor Relations Board.

Harlem Wizards Entertainment Basketball, Inc. v. NBA Properties, Inc.

952 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 27, 1997

Tartt testified that he told Board that he played for the Harlem Wizards. … Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., v.

Lehigh Valley R. v. Martin

19 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 14, 1936

United States Railroad Labor Board, 261 U.S. 72 , 43 S.Ct. 278 , 67 L.Ed. 536 ; United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. R. … From this difference between regulatory orders of administrative boards or commissions, which constitute action, compare Prentis v.

United States v. Mayor and Council of City of Hoboken, NJ

29 F.2d 932 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 10, 1928

In United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. … Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch, 110, 122 [ 3 L. Ed. 504 ]; Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 268, 305 , et seq. [ 20 L. Ed. 135 ]; Kirk v. Lynd, 106 U. S. 315, 316 [ 1 S. Ct. 296 , 27 L. Ed. 193 ]; Stoehr v.

The Boards of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825 Pension Fund, et al. v. Long Hill Contractors, Inc. et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 17, 2025

Boards of Trs. of Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs Loc. 825 Welfare Fund v. Del. Valley Crane Rental, Inc., No. 17-8567, 2021 WL 11653263, at *8 (D.N.J. … Brown v. Sandimo Materials, 250 F.3d 120, 129 (2d Cir. 2001); see also Carpenters Loc. Union No. 1846 of United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., AFL-CIO v.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Moskowitz

946 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 2, 1996

Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991); Schoch v. … By submitting the Marotta affidavit and the Board’s minutes, the RTC has raised questions concerning the underlying facts each had that cannot be resolved via summary judgment. Resolution Trust Corp. v.

Cuneo v. Local 472

175 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1959

With the exception of National Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

McLarty v. Borough of Ramsey

166 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 9, 1958

Citing Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, supra, and Maryland Casualty Co. v. … Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory, supra; Aralac, Inc., v. Hat Corp., 3 Cir., 166 F.2d 286 ; Bratley v. Nelson, D.C.S.D.Fla., 67 F.Supp. 272 .

C.P.M. v. D'Ilio

916 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 21, 1996

Delay by the Board in Notifying C.P.M.’s Employer In determining whether the parole board’s contact with C.P.M.’s employer is improper, the court first turns to the language of the board’s own rules. See Troia v. … Winsett v.

United States v. Citarelli

187 F. Supp. 2d 244 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 25, 2002

See United States v. … See United States v.