Case law

Stettauer v. New York & Scranton Construction Co.

42 N.J. Eq. 46 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1886

L. 1; Collins v. Yates, 37 L. J. Exch. 150; Opdyke v. … S.) 290; Cummer v. Kent, 38 Mich. 351 ; Commissioners v. Lemly, 85 N. C. 341 . See Saxby v. Easterbrook, L. R. (7 Exch.) 207; Bustros v. White, L. R. (1 Q. B. Div.) 423; Clyde v. Rogers, 24 Hun 145 ; McCargo v.

Bull v. International Power Co.

86 N.J. Eq. 275 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 17, 1916

Attorney-General, v. Security Life Insurance Co., 79 N. … The principle enunciated in these two cases (Weeks v. Weeks and People, ex rel. Attorney-General, v. Security Life Insurance Co.) is one of universal application.

Shields v. Greater Cape May, Inc.

6 N.J. Misc. 362 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 20, 1928

Backes, V. C. This stockholders’ bill is to set aside, and if not set aside to have declared the amount due on four real estate mortgages made by the Cape May Real Estate Company to Nelson Z. … The elaborate discussion in the briefs as to the binding force of agreements between a corporation and a member of its board of directors under the principle of law laid down in Stewart v.

Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Rutzler

86 N.J. Eq. 327 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 20, 1916

Lewis, V. C. This is on bill praying for an injunction to enjoin and restrain a suit at law brought by Lillian M. Rutzler, trustee, against the complainant in this suit. … Henry B- Lupton was a member of section 137 of the Endowment Rank, Knights of Pythias, and under the certificate of membership, issued to him, the board of control of that order agreed to pay to his daughter, Lillian M.

Wilson v. Wilson

66 N.J. Eq. 237 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 17, 1904

Stevenson, V. C. … Sargent v. Sargent, supra; McVickar v. McVickar, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 490; Smith v. Smith, 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 222; Van Wart v. Van Wart, 12 Dick. Ch. Rep. 598; Jeroleman v. Jeroleman, 54 Atl. Rep. 166 . In Smith v.

Third Ave. B. L. Assn. v. Prothero

124 N.J. Eq. 193 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 6, 1938

See, also, Trustees, c., of Public Schools v. City of Trenton, 30 N.J. Eq. 667 ; City of Paterson v. O'Neill, 32 N.J. Eq. 386 ; Howell v. Essex County Road Board, Ibid. 672; Lydecker v. Palisade Land Co., 33 N.J. … Eq. 415 ; Hudson Trust and Savings Institution v. Carr-Curran Paper Mills Co., 58 N.J. Eq. 59 ; Shaler v. McAleese, 73 N.J. Eq. 536 . In Howell v.

Barlow v. Barlow

2 N.J. Misc. 606 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 2, 1924

Buchanan, V. C. The wife’s petition is for divorce from bed and board on the ground of adultery.

Boardwalk National Bank v. Toboldt

104 N.J. Eq. 509 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1929

Realty Title and Mortgage Co. v. Schaaf, 81 N.J. Eq. 115 ; Bennett v. Orchard, 4 N.J. Mis. R. 807. … Wilson v. Brown, 13 N.J. Eq. ( 2 Beas. ) 277; Harrison v. Stewart, 18 N.J. Eq. ( 3 C.E. Gr. ) 451; Armstrong v. Ross, 20 N.J. Eq. ( 5 C.E. Gr. ) 109; Homeopathic Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Marshall, 32 N.J.

Bennett v. Van Riper

47 N.J. Eq. 563 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1890

Smith v. Campbell, 19 Ves. 400; Bennett v. Honeywood, Amb. 708. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syokel, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 12.

Brex v. Smith

104 N.J. Eq. 386 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 25, 1929

Canal Board of New York, 55 N.Y. 390 , as appears on page 11 of the prosecutor's brief, as follows: "Ch. J. Ames, in Greene v. … Hebe Co. v. Shaw, 248 U.S. 297 ; 39 Sup. Ct. 125 ; 63 L.Ed. 255 ; Greene v. Louisville, c., Railroad Co., 244 U.S. 499 , 506 , 507 ; 37 Sup. Ct. 673 ; 61 L.Ed. 1280 ; Ann. Cas. 1917 E 88; Truax v.

Fidelity v. McClintic-marshall Corp

115 N.J. Eq. 470 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 16, 1934

Board of Education v. Zink, 101 N.J. Eq. 78 ; Grover v. Board of Education, 102 N.J. Eq. 415 ; 104 N.J. Eq. 197 ; John W. Barwell, Inc., v. Vail, 108 N.J. Eq. 117 ; 111 N.J. Eq. 431 ; Guise v. John C. … West Shore Railroad Co. v. State Board, 92 N.J.L. 332 , 648 ; 104 Atl. Rep. 335 ; 106 Atl. Rep. 893 .

Roth v. Roth

90 N.J. Eq. 19 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 6, 1918

Stevens, V. C. … The application is made not on behalf of the sheriff, who may properly make it (Browning v. Flanagin, 22 N. J. Law 567; Lowenthal v. Wagner, 68 N. J.

Booth v. Land Filling & Improvement Co.

68 N.J. Eq. 536 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 25, 1905

Garrison, V. C. Tins is a motion founded upon a bill and affidavits and a supplemental bill and affidavits to secure a preliminary injunction restraining the individual defendants Messrs. … Booth, Dailey & Ivins” be stricken out and the following words substituted, “at a price to be agreed upon later by the board of directors.”

Washington Building & Loan Ass'n v. Beaghen

27 N.J. Eq. 98 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1876

Herbert v. Mech. Build, and Loan Assoc., 2 C. E. Green 497. … This appears by the resolution of the board granting the loan, and it is evident that Beaghen so understood the matter. The complainants are entitled to the benefit of the security of that mortgage accordingly.

Tr., Public Sch. v. the Ott Brewer

135 N.J. Eq. 174 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 8, 1944

Vide, State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or. 431 ; 165 Pac. Rep. 372 . … Vide, State Land Board v. Campbell, 13 Pac. Rep. 2d 346. Although the state is not the complainant eo nomine , the state is in reality the party in interest.

Alling v. Alling

52 N.J. Eq. 92 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1893

They are Hughes v. Hughes, supra; Pulsford v. Hunter, 3 Bro. Ch. C. 416; Haley v. Bannister, 4 Madd. 275; Whipple v. Dow, 2 Mass. 415 ; Dawes v. Howard, 4 Mass. 97 . … Up to that time she had merely boarded and clothed her and had paid nothing for her education except for music, and I think her charges for board &c. are rather extravagant.

Iserman v. International Stoker Co.

72 N.J. Eq. 708 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 15, 1907

u-arrison, V. 0. (after statement of issues). … On the 25th of September, 1905, the following preamble and resolutions were adopted by the board of directors: “Whereas, Clarence Iserman has taken up 100 shares of the option given to him according to a certain contract

Sweeney v. Williams

36 N.J. Eq. 459 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1883

Andrews v. Torrey, 1 McCart. 355; Atwater v. Underhill, 7 C. E. Gr. 599. … Cornish v. Bryan, 2 Stock 146; Smith v. Smith, 3 Stew. Eq. 564.

Slavin v. St. Stephens Roman, C., Church

114 N.J. Eq. 27 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 26, 1933

Joseph Marczinko, as president and secretary, respectively, of its board of trustees. … Gifford v. Thorn, supra; Seymour v. Long Dock Co., supra; Hoagland v. Supreme Council Royal Arcanum, 70 N.J. Eq. 607 ; Reeves v. Reeves, 102 N.J. Eq. 436 .

National House v. N.Y. Sash

138 N.J. Eq. 602 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 7, 1946

Simpson Plumbing and Heating Co. v. Geschke, 76 N.J. … See, also, Lewis Stern Sons, Inc. , v. Connolly, 95 N.J. Eq. 356 ; Zarecki v. Guarantee Realty Co., 82 N.J. Eq. 489 ; Forman v. Grant Lunch Corp., 113 N.J. Eq. 175 .