Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
1.60s
44 N.J. Eq. 89 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1888
See Morland v. Isaac, 20 Beav. 389; Brown v. Freeman, 4 De Cex & Sm. 444. *90 In Dodd, v. Jones, 137 Mass. 322 , ( 24 Am. Law Reg. (N. … B. 603; Morrison v. Orr, 3 Stew. & R. 49, 23 Am. Dec. 319 ; Rose v. Jackson, 40 Mich. 29 ; McGee v. Bast, 6 J. J. Marsh. 453; Gorham v. Gross, 117 Mass. 442 ; Poundstone v. Lewark, 4 Blackf. 173 ; but see Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Lawyers Home-Makers B. L. Assn.
128 N.J. Eq. 22 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 21, 1940
Bucsi v. Longworth Building and Loan Association, 119 N.J. Law 120 ; 194 Atl. Rep. 857 ; Rocker v. Cardinal Building and Loan Association, 119 N.J. Law 134 ; 194 Atl. … Rep. 865 , and only recently by the Supreme Court of the United States, Veix v. Sixth Ward Building and Loan Association of Newark, 60 Supreme Court 792; 84 L.Ed. 685 (reviewing and affirming Veix v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcCarter v. United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co.
75 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 20, 1908
Safford v. Barber, ubi supra. … Pl. & Pr. *545; Redmond v. Dickerson, 9 N. J. Eq. (1 Stock.) 507; Paterson H. Railroad Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 N.J. Misc. 323 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 30, 1923
Eieldeb, V. C. … Stanley and William Kasprzak and complain *324 ant constitute the present board of directors.
Cited 0 timesPublished96 N.J. Eq. 83 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 6, 1922
Would the son be disqualified from sitting in his board? Would not each be entitled to vote on the agreement? … In Stanley v. Freeholders of Passaic, 60 N.J.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPrudential Ins. v. Merritt-Chapman Scott
112 N.J. Eq. 179 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 18, 1933
Riggs *Page 184 v. Board of Supervisors, 73 U.S. 166 , 196 ; 18 L.Ed. 768 , 776 , and also in Taylor v. Carryl, 61 U.S. 583 , 617 ; 15 L.Ed. 1028 , 1032 . … Haupt Co. v. Board of Education of Edgewater ( Court of Errors and Appeals ), 87 N.J. Eq. 362 ; West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co. v. County of Cape May, 100 N.J. Eq. 181 ; Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished99 N.J. Eq. 53 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1926
In Episcopal Church v. Hebble, 95 N.J. Eq. 117 , a moiety of the mortgage was given to each and the Vernon Terrace house to the wife. … The defendant also claims that his wife ought to compel his adult son to pay board "for his own good."
Cited 6 timesPublished4 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1844
In Tweddell v. … In Stevenson and Woodruff v. Black, Saxton, 342, the principle of the case of Waring v. Ward and Tweddell v.
Cited 12 timesPublished31 N.J. Eq. 194 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879
Dim. (4th ed.) 491; also, Hick v. Hick, 5 Bush 670 ; Craven v. Craven, 27 Wis. 4Í8; Jenness v. Jenness, 24 Ind. 365 ; Vence v. Vence, 15 How. Pr. 497 , 576 ; Hope v. Hope, 27 E. L. & E. 2)9 ; Dutcher v. … Poole v. Hines, 52 Ga. 500 . See, further, Cobb v. Brown, Speer’s Ch. 564! Carow v. Mowatt, 2 Edw. Ch. 57 ; Hindmarsh v. Southgate, 3 Buss. 324; Chappie v. Cooper, 13 M. & W. 252; Loop v. Loop, 1 Vt. 177 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedMullins v. Merchandise Drivers, C., No. 641
120 N.J. Eq. 307 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 26, 1936
Robinson v. Lord Byron, 1 Brown Ch. 588; Lane v. Newdigate, 10 Ves. 192; Hervey v. Smith, 1 Kay J. 392; Beadel v. Perry, L.R. 3 Eq. 174; Whitecar v. Michenor, 37 N.J. Eq. 6 ; Broome v. Telephone Co., 42 N.J. … Robinson v. Lord Byron, 1 Brown Ch. 588; Lane v. Newdigate, 10 Ves. 192. So an obstruction to the flow of interstate freight must be preliminarily enjoined, even though it requires a mandatory injunction."
Cited 1 timesPublished125 N.J. Eq. 597 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 13, 1939
In the case of Ballantine v. Young, 79 N.J. Eq. 70 ; 81 Atl. … In the case of Hewitt v. Hewitt, 113 N.J. Eq. 299 ; 166 Atl.
Cited 2 timesPublished99 N.J. Eq. 717 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 16, 1926
Reliance is placed upon Logan v. Flattau, 73 N.J. … There has also been cited by the applicant the case of Carey v. Brown, 92 N.J. Eq. 497 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMississippi Wire Glass Co. v. Continuous Glass Press Co.
79 N.J. Eq. 277 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 18, 1911
Stevens, V. C. … The rules of the national board of fire underwriters make this very clear.
Cited 5 timesPublishedShaten v. American Nat. Bank of Camden
109 N.J. Eq. 307 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 20, 1931
It is manifest that the depositing of these bonds was made by the officers without any formal authority of the board of directors. but it is as manifest that all of the directors, with the possible exception of one, knew … Feist Feist, Inc. , v. A. A. Realty Co. ( Court of Errors and Appeals ), 105 N.J. Law 461 . See Joseph S. Naame Co. v. Louis Satanov Real Estate and Mortgage Corp., 109 N.J. Eq. 165 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedCommissioners of Public Instruction v. Fell
52 N.J. Eq. 689 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1894
Andrews v. Estes, 11 Me. 267 . In Gaskill v. … Whitney v. Stow, 111 Mass. 370 ; Connell v. Woodard, 5 How. 665 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedMiller v. Jersey Coast Resorts Corp.
98 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 9, 1925
This covenant has already been construed and explained by this court in DeGray v. Monmouth Beach Club House, 50 N.J. Eq. 329 , where Vice-Chancellor Green, in an elaborate opinion, analyzed the whole covenant. … But it was held in the DeGray Case that a boarding-house did not come within the purview of the covenant.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMechanics National Bank v. H. C. Burnet Manufacturing Co.
32 N.J. Eq. 236 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880
King v. Bedford Level, 6 East 369. … Charitable Association v. Baldwin, 1 Metc. (Mass.) 359 ; Green v. Cody, 9 Wend. 414 .
Cited 3 timesPublished98 N.J. Eq. 274 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 5, 1925
Cutler v. Tuttle, 19 N.J. Eq. 558 ; Read v. Huff, 40 N.J. Eq. 229 ; Mayer v. Kane, 69 N.J. Eq. 733 ; Yetman v. Hedgeman, 82 N.J. Eq. 221 . … Smith v. Burnet, 35 N.J. Eq. 314 ; Van Wagenen v. Bonnot, 74 N.J. Eq. 843 ; Campbell v. Akarman, 83 N.J. Law 567 .
Cited 7 timesPublished26 N.J. Eq. 107 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1875
cut saw, one large planing machine, one Rogers planing machine, fifty hand planes and irons for sticking machines, and all the apparatus thereunto belonging, and .also all stock now in said place of business; also, one brown … The character of this property is determined by the decision. of the Court of Errors and *110 Appeals in the case of Blancke v. Rogers, decided in March Term, 1875.
Cited 0 timesPublished118 N.J. Eq. 169 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 8, 1935
Defendant relies upon Devine v. Devine, 89 N.J. … Guth v. Guth, 3 Bro. C.C. 614; 29 Eng. Rep. 729; Vanderburgh v. Vanderburgh, 152 Minn. 189 ; 188 N.W. Rep. 276 ; Calkins v. Long (N.Y.), 22 Barb. 97 ; Mann v. Hulbert (N.Y.), 38 Hun. 27 ; see, also, 30 C.J. 1066.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna