Case law

Perrine v. Newell

49 N.J. Eq. 57 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Den. v. Lawshe, 4 Zab. 613; Moore v. Rake, 2 Dutch. 574; Wilson v. Brown, 2 Beas. 277; Harrison v. Stewart, 3 C. E. Gr. 451; Armstrong v. Ross, 5 C. E. Gr. 109. This court will not give effect to it. Phelps v. … Pentz v. Simonson, 2 Beas. 282 ; Wilson v. Brown, 2 Beas. 277 ; Harrison v. Stewart, 3 C. E. Gr. 451; Cutler v. Tuttle, 4 C. E. Gr. 549, 560 ; Armstrong v. Ross, 5 C. E. Gr. 109 ; Perkins v. Elliott, 7 C. E.

Meyer v. Meyer

124 N.J. Eq. 481 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1938

In Reeves v. … Reeves v. Weber, supra.

Stout v. Stout

44 N.J. Eq. 479 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Brown, 14 Vr. 37 , both as to the general rule and as to the exceptions, were approvingly referred to and relied on by the present Chancellor. … Brown, the court says that these exceptions are plainly distinguishable from legacies of a definite sum with remainder over.

Champion v. Genin

51 N.J. Eq. 38 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

Hurley v. Brown, 98 Mass. 545 ; Scanlan v. Geddes, 112 Mass. 15 ; Mead v. Parker, 115 Mass. 413 . … Doherty v. Hill, 144 Mass. 465 . The words “lot adjoining Pavonia Yacht Club ” &c. on their face show that they are applicable either to one piece of property or to more than one piece of property.

Colton Manor Co. v. Davis

106 N.J. Eq. 76 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 27, 1930

Justice Bodine in the court of errors and appeals, in Colton Manor Co. v. Davis, 104 N.J. Eq. 452 , as presented at the hearing upon the order to show cause were, viz: "After Dr. … Davis' idea for submission to the board of directors of the company. The attorney replied that Dr.

Bergen v. Rogers

73 N.J. Eq. 230 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 6, 1907

actual authorization by the board of any new bond was ever had at a meeting. … Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co., 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 815 (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1905).

Levin v. Attorney-General

136 N.J. Eq. 568 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 8, 1945

Noice v. Schnell, 101 N.J. Eq. 252 . The validity is well established of a testamentary bequest to "such charitable organizations, associations or institutions as my said executors may deem worthy." King v. … Brown v. Coxson, 118 N.J. Eq. 114 ; 119 N.J. Eq. 86 . The residuary clause of Miss Henry's will operated as a bequest to such charities as the executor might appoint.

Frobisher v. Tudor Corp.

114 N.J. Eq. 470 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 16, 1933

Le Gendre v. Goodridge, 46 N.J. Eq. 419 ; McFadden v. Mays Landing, c., Railroad Co., 49 N.J. Eq. 176 ; Johnes v. Outwater, supra; Schultze v. Van Doren, 64 N.J. Eq. 465 . … Brown v. Denver Omnibus and Cab Co., 254 Fed. Rep. 560. The bill presents no such equities. Complainants are precluded by the indenture from maintaining their suit.

Dunlop v. Chenoweth

90 N.J. Eq. 85 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 13, 1918

In Oakley v. Shaw, 69 Atl. … This practice rule was accepted with approval by Vice-Chancellor Garrison in Cropper v. Brown, 76 N. J. Eq. 406, and by Vice-Chancellor Howell in Koegel v. Koegel, 83 N. J. Eq. 179.

Schwartze v. City of Camden

77 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 12, 1910

Leaming, V. C. … The board of aldermen appointed commissioners to purchase a site and build thereon a public market.

Van Horn v. Demarest

76 N.J. Eq. 386 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 26, 1909

Brown St. of F. § 118; Duvale v. Duvale, 54 N. J. Eq. (9 Dick.) 581, 588. The defence of the statute of frauds is available to the defendants under their answer which denies the making of the contract. Lozier v. … Eq. (21 Dick.) 442; Lehigh Zinc Co. v. Trotter, 43 N. J. Eq. (16 Stew.) 185, 204; Seymour v. Long Dock Co. (1869), *392 20 N. J. Eq. (5 C. E. Gr.) 396, 407; Coast Company v. Spring Lake, 56 N. J.

Daly v. Ely

53 N.J. Eq. 270 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1895

Pitney, V. C. The dispute common to both cases is as to the amount of fees for publishing advertisements of sale to be allowed to the newspaper publishing the same. … It does not say that such public officer or board shall pay so much and no more, or that such newspaper shall be entitled to charge so much and no more, but simply that it shall be lawful to pay so much and no more.

West Long Branch v. Home Bldg., C., Co.

99 N.J. Eq. 738 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1926

Dodd v. Board, 67 N.J. Law 463 . It based its decision on a finding of fact. No appeal from that decision was taken. This finding of fact is, at least, evidential here. … Morris Railroad Co. v. Prudden, 20 N.J. Eq. 531 ; Halsey v. Rapid Transit Co., 47 N.J. Eq. 380 ; Humphreys v. Eastlack, 63 N.J. Eq. 136 .

Pflugar v. Pultz

43 N.J. Eq. 440 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1887

Bird, V. C. … Updike v. Ten Broeck, 3 Vr. 105 ; Kent v. Kent, 62 N. Y. 560 ; Peters v. Westborough, 19 Pick. 364 ; Ridley v. Ridley, 34 Beav. 478; Bell v. Hewitt, 24 Ind. 280 .

A. Hollander v. Philip A. Singer

119 N.J. Eq. 52 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 5, 1935

Justice Pitney, speaking for the United States supreme court in the case of Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers Co., 240 U.S. 251 ; 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 269 . … The court further said: "(5) Under the facts found and proved, the rule of Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers Co., 240 U.S. 251 ; 36 S.Ct. 269 ; 60 L.Ed. 629 , is applicable.

Kuser v. Cooke

112 N.J. Eq. 553 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 29, 1933

Salt Lake City National Bank v. Hendrickson, 40 N.J. Law 52 ; Boehme v. Rall, 51 N.J. Eq. 541 ; Franklin Trust v. Rutherford, c., Electric Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 42 ; Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co., 69 N.J. Eq. 723 . … Schuler v. Southern Iron and Steel Co., 77 N.J. Eq. 60 ; Hageman v. Brown, 76 N.J. Eq. 126 ; Muller v. Muller, 76 N.J. Eq. 158 ; Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Sturges, 33 N.J. Eq. 328 .

Shafto v. Shafto

28 N.J. Eq. 34 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1877

His bill was not filed until after he had been sued for her ■ board by the person in whose family she lived after she left him. … Shelford on Marr. and Div. 211; 2 Bishop on Marr. and Div. § 584. “ If,” says Sir William Scott, in Briggs v.

Blaine v. Krysowaty

135 N.J. Eq. 355 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 7, 1944

Baldwin v. Campfield, 8 N.J. Eq. 891 ; Servis v. Nelson, 14 N.J. Eq. 94 ; Cutler v. Tuttle, 19 N.J. Eq. 549 ; Eyre v. Eyre, 19 N.J. Eq. 42 ; *Page 356 Johns v. Norris, 22 N.J. Eq. 102 ; Watson v. Murray, 23 N.J. … Down v. Down, 80 N.J. Eq. 68 ; 82 Atl. Rep. 322 . A constructive trust must be evidenced by some more influential circumstance than a mere breach of an oral promise to reconvey or to hold in trust. Brown v.

Shanik v. Botany Worsted Mills

133 N.J. Eq. 219 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 31, 1943

It is also alleged that "The Board of Directors consists largely of officers and managers of the Corporation. Some or many of them may be holders of Class B stock," c. … Fuller v. Hollander Co., 61 N.J. Eq. 648 . The bill herein does not come within any of the above stated situations. Complainant cites the cases of Archer v. American Water Works Co., 50 N.J. Eq. 33 ; Scott v. P.

Henry v. Henry

79 N.J. Eq. 493 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1912

The sixth section of the Divorce act of 1907 provides as follows: “For purposes of divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, jurisdiction may be acquired by personal service of process upon the defendant within this … Griffiths v. Griffiths, 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 689.