Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.96s

  • Mueller v. Morrell

    112 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 25, 1933

    Clos v. Boppe, 23 N.J. Eq. 270 ; Parker v. Child, 25 N.J. Eq. 41 ; Hoppock's Ex'rs v. Ramsey, 28 N.J. Eq. 413 ; Andrus v. Vreeland, 29 N.J. Eq. 394 ; Nagle v. Conrad, 79 N.J. Eq. 124 ; affirmed, 80 N.J. … Eq. 252 ; Tennenberger v. Sozio, 101 N.J. Eq. 64 ; Dieckmann v. Walser, 112 N.J. Eq. 46 ; Van Wagenen v. Brown, 26 N.J. Law 196 ; Duncan v. Smith, 31 N.J. Law 325 ; Mulford v. Peterson, 35 N.J. Law 127 ; N.J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Regan v. Regan

    100 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1926

    "To constitute the cruelty justifying a divorce from bed and board there must have been a violence causing a reasonable apprehension of danger of life, limb or health from further cohabitation. Close v. Close, 24 N.J. … Hewitt v. Hewitt, 37 Atl. Rep. 1011 . It is apparent, therefore, that these acts in themselves are not sufficient to sustain the allegation of extreme cruelty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • White v. Mayor of Newark

    89 N.J. Eq. 5 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1918

    Stevens, V. C. The testator, Chester R. … The following, among others, are New Jersey cases illustrating the subject: McBride v. Elmer, 2 Halst. Ch. 107; Mason's Executors v. Trustees of M. E. Church, 27 N. J. Eq. 47; Brown v. Pancoast, 34 N. J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Burton

    52 N.J. Eq. 215 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1893

    Green, V. C. The parties to this action were married in 1855. In 1874 they removed from Jersey City and went to live at 190 Lafayette street, in Brooklyn. … J., where you are welcome to bed and board on and after June 5th, 1891; and after the said date, I shall cease to pay to the Brooklyn Board of Charities the allowance awarded by the court for your support.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woolston v. Beck

    34 N.J. Eq. 74 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

    Flinn v. Jenkins, 1 Coll. 365; Taniere v. Pearkes, 2 Sim. & Stu. 383; Willes v. Douglass, 10 Beav. 44; Turner v. Whittaker, 19 Beav. 196; Sarel v. Sarel, Id. 87; Swan v. Holmes, 19 Beav. 471; Abrey v. … Newman, 16 Beav. 431; Brown v. Jarvis, 2 De Gex, F. & J. 168; Drakeley’s Estate, 19 Beav. 395; Arrow v. Mellish, 1 De Gex & S. 355; Doe d. Patrick v. Boyle, 13 Q. B. 100.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fox v. Fox

    135 N.J. Eq. 186 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1944

    See Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 129 N.J. Eq. 610 . The company was formed under the General Corporation Act, R.S. … the approval of the said board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pincus v. U.S. Dyeing and Cleaning Works

    99 N.J. Eq. 160 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 20, 1926

    In the case of Watson v. Rowley, 63 N.J. … It appears that the president signed "by order of the board of directors." He did not acknowledge.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Indemnity Co. v. Carroll

    2 N.J. Misc. 657 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 18, 1924

    Buchanan, V. C. … In the second place, as to the board of trustees, the evidence shows that only one or two of the board of trustees knew of the practice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Palmer

    22 N.J. Eq. 88 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1871

    Woodworth v. Woodworth, 6 C. E. Green 251; Reid v. Reid, Ibid. 331; Cummins v. Cummins, 2 McCarter 142. … Laing v. Laing, 6 C. E.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schwarz v. Orion B. L. Assn.

    129 N.J. Eq. 297 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 16, 1941

    Dividends at the rate of six per cent. were paid to income shareholders until September 1st, 1932, when such dividends were reduced to five per cent. by the board of directors. … National State Bank v. Victory Building and Loan Association, 120 N.J. Eq. 277 ; 184 Atl. Rep. 738 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Local No. 11, C., Ironworkers v. McKee

    114 N.J. Eq. 555 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 11, 1933

    See Schuster v. Ventnor Gardens, 103 N.J. Eq. 93 ; Walker v. Walker Realty Co., Ibid. 300. … See Walsche v. Sherlock, 110 N.J. Eq. 223 (at p. 239 ), citing Correia v. Supreme Lodge of Portuguese Fraternity, c., 218 Mass. 305 ; 105 N.E.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schaefer v. Daniels

    135 N.J. Eq. 179 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 8, 1944

    Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 128 N.J. Eq. 197 ; 15 Atl. Rep. 2d 788; Clayton v. Asbury Park and Ocean Grove Bank, 115 N.J. Eq. 480 ; 171 Atl. Rep. 502 ; Civic Enterprises, Inc., v. Mechanics' Trust Co., 115 N.J. … Rep. 696 ; Nelson v. Errickson, 81 N.J. Eq. 226 ; 87 Atl. Rep. 116 ; Streeter v. Braman, 76 N.J. Eq. 371 ; 74 Atl. Rep. 659 ; Filley v. Van Dyke, 75 N.J. Eq. 571 ; 72 Atl. Rep. 943 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Stout

    4 N.J. Eq. 492 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

    As to possession being notice, see Daniels v. Davison, 16 Ves. 249; Taylor v. Stibbert, 2 Ves. 440; Smith v. Low, 1 Atkyns, 490; Allen v. An thony, 1 Merivale, 282; 2 Fonb. Eq. … B. 2, ch. 6, sec. 2; Lowther v. Carlton, 2 Atk. 242; Ferrars v. Cherry, 2 Vern. 383; Mertins v. Jolliffe, Amb. R. 313; Sweet v. Southcote, 2 Brown’s Ch. R. 66; McQueen v. Farquhar, 11 Ves. 477, 8; Ingram v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meyerhoff v. Bankers Securities, Inc.

    105 N.J. Eq. 76 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 7, 1929

    Therefore, it was resolved that the board of directors were authorized to sell and convey all the assets of the corporation, real and personal, to such persons and at such prices as in the judgment of the board should seem … It will have been remarked that in Kean v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rothenberg v. Franklin Washington Trust Co.

    127 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1940

    Bergen, supra; Stewart v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 38 N. J. Law 505; Shanley’s Estate v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 108 N. J. Eq. 564; McAllister v. McAllister, 120 N. J. Eq. 407; affirmed, 121 N. J. Eq. 264; Gates v. … Eq. 7; affirmed, ibid. 710; Bunting v. Bunting, 87 N. J. Eq. 20; Graves v. Graves, 94 N. J. Eq. 268; Morris v. Glaser, 106 N. J. Eq. 585; affirmed, 110 N. J. Eq. 661; Reuther v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 116 N. J.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Johnson Johnson v. Weissbard

    120 N.J. Eq. 314 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 12, 1936

    State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J. Eq. 504 , 522 . … Durham Realty Corp. v. La Fetra, 230 N.Y. 429 ; 130 N.E. Rep. 601 ; 16 A.L.R. 152 ; Marcus Brown Holding Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Nat. Bk., Lyndhurst v. Bianchi Smith

    106 N.J. Eq. 333 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 6, 1930

    Miller v. Gourley, 65 N.J. Eq. 237 ; Regina Music Box Co. v. Otto Son, 65 N.J. Eq. 582 ; Empire State Trust Co. v. Trustees, c., 67 N.J. Eq. 602 ; Agnew Co. v. Paterson Board of Education, 83 N.J. … But repealers by implication are not favored ( Hotel Registry Realty Corp. v. Stafford, 70 N.J. Law 528 ; Hartley v. Board of Elections, 93 N.J. Law 313 ; Commissioners v. Gardner, 104 N.J.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Newark

    72 N.J. Eq. 841 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 18, 1907

    Delafield Construction Co. v. Sayre, 60 N. J. Law (31 Vr.) 449. … Johnson v. Buttler, 31 N. J. Eq. (4 Stew.) 36; Scott v. Lalor, 18 N. J. Eq. (3 C. E. Gr.) 301.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burnham v. Dalling

    16 N.J. Eq. 310 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1863

    Brown, 16 Vesey 344, a similar motion was made on the part of the defendants to consolidate several actions, and both Sir Samuel Romilly, by whom the motion was made, and the Chancellor (Lord Eldon) speak of the practice … Den v. Kimble, 4 Halst. R. 337; Worley v. Glentworth, 5 Halst. R. 241.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ingersoll v. Stiger

    46 N.J. Eq. 511 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890

    Green, V. C. … Rober v. Burgess, 5 C. E. Gr. 139; Fey v. Fey, 12 C. E. Gr. 213; Brown v. Kahnweiler, 1 Stew. Fq. 311.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.