Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
0.96s
112 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 25, 1933
Clos v. Boppe, 23 N.J. Eq. 270 ; Parker v. Child, 25 N.J. Eq. 41 ; Hoppock's Ex'rs v. Ramsey, 28 N.J. Eq. 413 ; Andrus v. Vreeland, 29 N.J. Eq. 394 ; Nagle v. Conrad, 79 N.J. Eq. 124 ; affirmed, 80 N.J. … Eq. 252 ; Tennenberger v. Sozio, 101 N.J. Eq. 64 ; Dieckmann v. Walser, 112 N.J. Eq. 46 ; Van Wagenen v. Brown, 26 N.J. Law 196 ; Duncan v. Smith, 31 N.J. Law 325 ; Mulford v. Peterson, 35 N.J. Law 127 ; N.J.
Cited 3 timesPublished100 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1926
"To constitute the cruelty justifying a divorce from bed and board there must have been a violence causing a reasonable apprehension of danger of life, limb or health from further cohabitation. Close v. Close, 24 N.J. … Hewitt v. Hewitt, 37 Atl. Rep. 1011 . It is apparent, therefore, that these acts in themselves are not sufficient to sustain the allegation of extreme cruelty.
Cited 1 timesPublished89 N.J. Eq. 5 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1918
Stevens, V. C. The testator, Chester R. … The following, among others, are New Jersey cases illustrating the subject: McBride v. Elmer, 2 Halst. Ch. 107; Mason's Executors v. Trustees of M. E. Church, 27 N. J. Eq. 47; Brown v. Pancoast, 34 N. J.
Cited 5 timesPublished52 N.J. Eq. 215 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1893
Green, V. C. The parties to this action were married in 1855. In 1874 they removed from Jersey City and went to live at 190 Lafayette street, in Brooklyn. … J., where you are welcome to bed and board on and after June 5th, 1891; and after the said date, I shall cease to pay to the Brooklyn Board of Charities the allowance awarded by the court for your support.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 N.J. Eq. 74 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881
Flinn v. Jenkins, 1 Coll. 365; Taniere v. Pearkes, 2 Sim. & Stu. 383; Willes v. Douglass, 10 Beav. 44; Turner v. Whittaker, 19 Beav. 196; Sarel v. Sarel, Id. 87; Swan v. Holmes, 19 Beav. 471; Abrey v. … Newman, 16 Beav. 431; Brown v. Jarvis, 2 De Gex, F. & J. 168; Drakeley’s Estate, 19 Beav. 395; Arrow v. Mellish, 1 De Gex & S. 355; Doe d. Patrick v. Boyle, 13 Q. B. 100.
Cited 1 timesPublished135 N.J. Eq. 186 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1944
See Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 129 N.J. Eq. 610 . The company was formed under the General Corporation Act, R.S. … the approval of the said board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPincus v. U.S. Dyeing and Cleaning Works
99 N.J. Eq. 160 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 20, 1926
In the case of Watson v. Rowley, 63 N.J. … It appears that the president signed "by order of the board of directors." He did not acknowledge.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNew Jersey Indemnity Co. v. Carroll
2 N.J. Misc. 657 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 18, 1924
Buchanan, V. C. … In the second place, as to the board of trustees, the evidence shows that only one or two of the board of trustees knew of the practice.
Cited 0 timesPublished22 N.J. Eq. 88 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1871
Woodworth v. Woodworth, 6 C. E. Green 251; Reid v. Reid, Ibid. 331; Cummins v. Cummins, 2 McCarter 142. … Laing v. Laing, 6 C. E.
Cited 2 timesPublished129 N.J. Eq. 297 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 16, 1941
Dividends at the rate of six per cent. were paid to income shareholders until September 1st, 1932, when such dividends were reduced to five per cent. by the board of directors. … National State Bank v. Victory Building and Loan Association, 120 N.J. Eq. 277 ; 184 Atl. Rep. 738 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedLocal No. 11, C., Ironworkers v. McKee
114 N.J. Eq. 555 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 11, 1933
See Schuster v. Ventnor Gardens, 103 N.J. Eq. 93 ; Walker v. Walker Realty Co., Ibid. 300. … See Walsche v. Sherlock, 110 N.J. Eq. 223 (at p. 239 ), citing Correia v. Supreme Lodge of Portuguese Fraternity, c., 218 Mass. 305 ; 105 N.E.
Cited 4 timesPublished135 N.J. Eq. 179 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 8, 1944
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 128 N.J. Eq. 197 ; 15 Atl. Rep. 2d 788; Clayton v. Asbury Park and Ocean Grove Bank, 115 N.J. Eq. 480 ; 171 Atl. Rep. 502 ; Civic Enterprises, Inc., v. Mechanics' Trust Co., 115 N.J. … Rep. 696 ; Nelson v. Errickson, 81 N.J. Eq. 226 ; 87 Atl. Rep. 116 ; Streeter v. Braman, 76 N.J. Eq. 371 ; 74 Atl. Rep. 659 ; Filley v. Van Dyke, 75 N.J. Eq. 571 ; 72 Atl. Rep. 943 .
Cited 2 timesPublished4 N.J. Eq. 492 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845
As to possession being notice, see Daniels v. Davison, 16 Ves. 249; Taylor v. Stibbert, 2 Ves. 440; Smith v. Low, 1 Atkyns, 490; Allen v. An thony, 1 Merivale, 282; 2 Fonb. Eq. … B. 2, ch. 6, sec. 2; Lowther v. Carlton, 2 Atk. 242; Ferrars v. Cherry, 2 Vern. 383; Mertins v. Jolliffe, Amb. R. 313; Sweet v. Southcote, 2 Brown’s Ch. R. 66; McQueen v. Farquhar, 11 Ves. 477, 8; Ingram v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMeyerhoff v. Bankers Securities, Inc.
105 N.J. Eq. 76 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 7, 1929
Therefore, it was resolved that the board of directors were authorized to sell and convey all the assets of the corporation, real and personal, to such persons and at such prices as in the judgment of the board should seem … It will have been remarked that in Kean v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRothenberg v. Franklin Washington Trust Co.
127 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1940
Bergen, supra; Stewart v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 38 N. J. Law 505; Shanley’s Estate v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 108 N. J. Eq. 564; McAllister v. McAllister, 120 N. J. Eq. 407; affirmed, 121 N. J. Eq. 264; Gates v. … Eq. 7; affirmed, ibid. 710; Bunting v. Bunting, 87 N. J. Eq. 20; Graves v. Graves, 94 N. J. Eq. 268; Morris v. Glaser, 106 N. J. Eq. 585; affirmed, 110 N. J. Eq. 661; Reuther v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 116 N. J.
Cited 12 timesPublished120 N.J. Eq. 314 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 12, 1936
State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J. Eq. 504 , 522 . … Durham Realty Corp. v. La Fetra, 230 N.Y. 429 ; 130 N.E. Rep. 601 ; 16 A.L.R. 152 ; Marcus Brown Holding Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst Nat. Bk., Lyndhurst v. Bianchi Smith
106 N.J. Eq. 333 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 6, 1930
Miller v. Gourley, 65 N.J. Eq. 237 ; Regina Music Box Co. v. Otto Son, 65 N.J. Eq. 582 ; Empire State Trust Co. v. Trustees, c., 67 N.J. Eq. 602 ; Agnew Co. v. Paterson Board of Education, 83 N.J. … But repealers by implication are not favored ( Hotel Registry Realty Corp. v. Stafford, 70 N.J. Law 528 ; Hartley v. Board of Elections, 93 N.J. Law 313 ; Commissioners v. Gardner, 104 N.J.
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Newark
72 N.J. Eq. 841 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 18, 1907
Delafield Construction Co. v. Sayre, 60 N. J. Law (31 Vr.) 449. … Johnson v. Buttler, 31 N. J. Eq. (4 Stew.) 36; Scott v. Lalor, 18 N. J. Eq. (3 C. E. Gr.) 301.
Cited 1 timesPublished16 N.J. Eq. 310 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1863
Brown, 16 Vesey 344, a similar motion was made on the part of the defendants to consolidate several actions, and both Sir Samuel Romilly, by whom the motion was made, and the Chancellor (Lord Eldon) speak of the practice … Den v. Kimble, 4 Halst. R. 337; Worley v. Glentworth, 5 Halst. R. 241.
Cited 6 timesPublished46 N.J. Eq. 511 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890
Green, V. C. … Rober v. Burgess, 5 C. E. Gr. 139; Fey v. Fey, 12 C. E. Gr. 213; Brown v. Kahnweiler, 1 Stew. Fq. 311.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna