Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
2.77s
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
126 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 7, 1939
In Board of Home Missions, c. , v. Saltmer, 125 N.J. Eq. 33 , the court (at p. 37 ), said: "The question whether an instrument is in execution of a power or not depends solely upon the intent of the donee. … Botzum v. Havana National Bank, supra. It is clear, I think, that neither the complainant Brown, nor any of Mrs.
Cited 19 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
142 N.J. Eq. 276 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 29, 1948
Jayne, V. C. In this cause the factual constituents have been mutually supplied. … Vide, Board of Education, West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N. J. Eq. 57; 106 Atl. Rep. 32 ; Baird v. Board of Recreation Commissioners, South Orange, 110 N. J. Eq. 603; 160 Atl. Rep. 537 ; Curtis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
135 N.J. Eq. 404 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 13, 1944
Brown and the Trust Company, as executors for the period March 1st, 1930, to March 16th, 1940, Mrs. Brown "having refused to swear to or subscribe said account." … Brown, or either of them, whether as executor or trustee.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Brown
30 N.J. Eq. 193 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878
See 2 Scribner on Dower 276; Powell v. Monson, 3 Mas. 347 ; Slone v. Montgomery , 35 Mis's. 83 ; Dinsley v. Brown, 13 Gonn. 192; Hall v. Pedson, 10 Mich. 21 ; Barns v. Dyade, 6 Allen 305 . In Bird v. … Brake, 100 Mass. 174 ; Ingoldsby v. Juan, 12 Cal. 564 ; Pike v. Bacon, 21 Me. 280, 287 ; Armstrong v. Stovall, 26 Miss. 275, 282 ; Linsley v. Brown, 13 Conn. 192 . Ball v. Bunsterville, 4 T.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
10 N.J. Misc. 555 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 14, 1932
Brown and Arthur E. Tillard, the complainants in this suit, who became entitled to the principal of their mother’s share of the trust fund upon her death. … In Ogden v. Thornton, 30 N. J. Eq. 569, he said: “A court of equity must always aim to act upon broad principles of justice, disentangled as much as possible from little technicalities.” And in Livermore v.
Cited 5 timesPublished90 N.J. Eq. 57 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 23, 1919
Lewis, V. C. … Rep. 351 ; Oxford Board of Trade v. Oxford Iron and Steel Co., 81 N. J. Law 694; Freeholders of the County of Cumberland v. Buck, 79 N. J. Eq. 472; Munro v. Syracuse Railway Co., 200 N. Y. 224 ; State v. Brown, 27 N. J.
Cited 17 timesPublishedBrown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
134 N.J. Eq. 217 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1943
Security Trust Co. v. Lovett, 78 N.J. Eq. 445 , 452 ; U.S. Trust Co. v. Jamison, 105 N.J. Eq. 418 . … Rep. 325 ; Spencer v. Adams (Mass.), 97 N.E. Rep. 743; Kingsbury v. Walter ( 1901 ), A.C. 187; 7 B.R.C. 775. In the last cited case, see especially the opinion of Lord Davey.
Cited 3 timesPublished47 N.J. Eq. 421 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1890
Pitney, V. C. … Bechtel v. Carslake, 3 Stock. 500 ; Barnett v. Johnson, supra; Riehle v. Heulings, 11 Stew. Eq. 20, and Gawtry v. Leland, 13 Stew.
Cited 17 timesPublishedBattery Park National Bank v. Brown
85 N.J. Eq. 70 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 2, 1915
In Outcalt v. Ludlow, 32 N. J. … Bank v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFreehold Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Brown
28 N.J. Eq. 42 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1877
Cited 0 timesPublishedFreehold Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Brown
29 N.J. Eq. 121 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878
Brown, in his answer, sets up the defence of usury to both mortgages. … In Middleton v. N. J. West Line R. R. Co., 11 C. E.
Cited 0 timesPublished98 N.J. Eq. 206 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 16, 1925
Cohn v. Colgan, 97 N.J. Eq. 9 . … Norton v. Bridge Co., 51 N.J. Law 442 ; Doctor v. Desmond, 80 N.J. Eq. 77 ; Condensed Milk Co. v. Brandenburg, 40 N.J. Law 111 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Duparquet
50 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892
This is illustrated by the cases of Dearie v. Hall and Loveridge v. Cooper, 3 Russ. 1. … Craig v. Smith, 8 Vr. 549 ; Shannon v. Hoboken, 10 Stew. Eq. 123, 127, 318; Lanigan’s Admr. v. Bradley and Currier Co., 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 201.
Cited 4 timesPublished80 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 25, 1912
Subsequent to the decision in Frank v. Freeholders, supra, our legislature passed the Municipal Liens act, and in Arzonico v. Board of Education of West New York, 75 N. J. … As already suggested, this view is not in conflict with Arzonico v. Board of Education, heretofore referred to.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJohnson v. Board of Commissioners
33 N.J. Eq. 152 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880
Milward v. Earl of Thanet, 5 Ves. 720, note b. … Eads v. Williams, 4 De G. M. & G. 691. In Van Doren v. Robinson, 1 C. E. Gr. 263, Chancellor Green said : “ Great delay, unaccounted for, is a bar to a claim for specific performance.”
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrunson v. Board of Freeholders
76 N.J. Eq. 480 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 25, 1909
The board of freeholders-are now engaged in improving the highway by widening, grading and macadamizing it. … That case was followed in this state by Chancellor Runyon, in the case of Manko v. Chambersburg, 25 N. J. Eq. (10 C. E. Gr.) 168.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMiddlesex County Welfare Board v. Motolinsky
134 N.J. Eq. 323 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 20, 1944
The county welfare board shall take from each applicant a properly acknowledged agreement to reimburse for all advances granted, and pursuant to such agreement said applicant shall assign to the welfare board, as collateral … security for said advances, all or any part of his personal property as the board shall specify." * * * * * * * * "At any time the county welfare board may execute and file with the clerk of the court of common pleas or
Cited 7 timesPublished39 N.J. Eq. 123 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1884
Nichols v. Disner, 5 Dutch. 293. The issuing of the execution after Maria Berry’s death without revivor was, at most, merely erroneous. Howard v. Pitt, 1 Salk. 261; Day v. Sharp, 4. Whart. 339; Hughes v. … McCa hill v. Equitable Life Ins. Soc., 11 C. E. Gr. 531; Shultz v. Sanders, 11 Stew. Eq. 154. In this case there was a formal order that the alias execution issue.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGrace v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
71 N.J. Eq. 541 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 21, 1906
State v. Crowley, 39 N. J. Law (10 Vr.) 264, 270 (Supreme Court, 1877). … Seymour v. Freer, 8 Wall. 202, 218 (1868).
Cited 6 timesPublished12 N.J. Misc. 460 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1934
Lewis, V. 0. The rights of the parties are before this court for the second time. … The deed on which the rights depend came before this court on a bill to quiet title, the decision in which is reported in Board of Education of West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N. J. Eq. 57; 106 Atl. Rep. 32 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna