Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

2.77s

  • Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

    126 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 7, 1939

    In Board of Home Missions, c. , v. Saltmer, 125 N.J. Eq. 33 , the court (at p. 37 ), said: "The question whether an instrument is in execution of a power or not depends solely upon the intent of the donee. … Botzum v. Havana National Bank, supra. It is clear, I think, that neither the complainant Brown, nor any of Mrs.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    142 N.J. Eq. 276 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 29, 1948

    Jayne, V. C. In this cause the factual constituents have been mutually supplied. … Vide, Board of Education, West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N. J. Eq. 57; 106 Atl. Rep. 32 ; Baird v. Board of Recreation Commissioners, South Orange, 110 N. J. Eq. 603; 160 Atl. Rep. 537 ; Curtis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

    135 N.J. Eq. 404 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 13, 1944

    Brown and the Trust Company, as executors for the period March 1st, 1930, to March 16th, 1940, Mrs. Brown "having refused to swear to or subscribe said account." … Brown, or either of them, whether as executor or trustee.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Brown

    30 N.J. Eq. 193 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

    See 2 Scribner on Dower 276; Powell v. Monson, 3 Mas. 347 ; Slone v. Montgomery , 35 Mis's. 83 ; Dinsley v. Brown, 13 Gonn. 192; Hall v. Pedson, 10 Mich. 21 ; Barns v. Dyade, 6 Allen 305 . In Bird v. … Brake, 100 Mass. 174 ; Ingoldsby v. Juan, 12 Cal. 564 ; Pike v. Bacon, 21 Me. 280, 287 ; Armstrong v. Stovall, 26 Miss. 275, 282 ; Linsley v. Brown, 13 Conn. 192 . Ball v. Bunsterville, 4 T.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

    10 N.J. Misc. 555 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 14, 1932

    Brown and Arthur E. Tillard, the complainants in this suit, who became entitled to the principal of their mother’s share of the trust fund upon her death. … In Ogden v. Thornton, 30 N. J. Eq. 569, he said: “A court of equity must always aim to act upon broad principles of justice, disentangled as much as possible from little technicalities.” And in Livermore v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Brophy

    90 N.J. Eq. 57 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 23, 1919

    Lewis, V. C. … Rep. 351 ; Oxford Board of Trade v. Oxford Iron and Steel Co., 81 N. J. Law 694; Freeholders of the County of Cumberland v. Buck, 79 N. J. Eq. 472; Munro v. Syracuse Railway Co., 200 N. Y. 224 ; State v. Brown, 27 N. J.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

    134 N.J. Eq. 217 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1943

    Security Trust Co. v. Lovett, 78 N.J. Eq. 445 , 452 ; U.S. Trust Co. v. Jamison, 105 N.J. Eq. 418 . … Rep. 325 ; Spencer v. Adams (Mass.), 97 N.E. Rep. 743; Kingsbury v. Walter ( 1901 ), A.C. 187; 7 B.R.C. 775. In the last cited case, see especially the opinion of Lord Davey.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dill v. Board of Education

    47 N.J. Eq. 421 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1890

    Pitney, V. C. … Bechtel v. Carslake, 3 Stock. 500 ; Barnett v. Johnson, supra; Riehle v. Heulings, 11 Stew. Eq. 20, and Gawtry v. Leland, 13 Stew.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Battery Park National Bank v. Brown

    85 N.J. Eq. 70 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 2, 1915

    In Outcalt v. Ludlow, 32 N. J. … Bank v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Freehold Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Brown

    28 N.J. Eq. 42 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1877

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Freehold Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Brown

    29 N.J. Eq. 121 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

    Brown, in his answer, sets up the defence of usury to both mortgages. … In Middleton v. N. J. West Line R. R. Co., 11 C. E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. John P. Smythe Co.

    98 N.J. Eq. 206 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 16, 1925

    Cohn v. Colgan, 97 N.J. Eq. 9 . … Norton v. Bridge Co., 51 N.J. Law 442 ; Doctor v. Desmond, 80 N.J. Eq. 77 ; Condensed Milk Co. v. Brandenburg, 40 N.J. Law 111 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Duparquet

    50 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892

    This is illustrated by the cases of Dearie v. Hall and Loveridge v. Cooper, 3 Russ. 1. … Craig v. Smith, 8 Vr. 549 ; Shannon v. Hoboken, 10 Stew. Eq. 123, 127, 318; Lanigan’s Admr. v. Bradley and Currier Co., 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 201.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Tait

    80 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 25, 1912

    Subsequent to the decision in Frank v. Freeholders, supra, our legislature passed the Municipal Liens act, and in Arzonico v. Board of Education of West New York, 75 N. J. … As already suggested, this view is not in conflict with Arzonico v. Board of Education, heretofore referred to.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

    33 N.J. Eq. 152 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880

    Milward v. Earl of Thanet, 5 Ves. 720, note b. … Eads v. Williams, 4 De G. M. & G. 691. In Van Doren v. Robinson, 1 C. E. Gr. 263, Chancellor Green said : “ Great delay, unaccounted for, is a bar to a claim for specific performance.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brunson v. Board of Freeholders

    76 N.J. Eq. 480 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 25, 1909

    The board of freeholders-are now engaged in improving the highway by widening, grading and macadamizing it. … That case was followed in this state by Chancellor Runyon, in the case of Manko v. Chambersburg, 25 N. J. Eq. (10 C. E. Gr.) 168.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Middlesex County Welfare Board v. Motolinsky

    134 N.J. Eq. 323 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 20, 1944

    The county welfare board shall take from each applicant a properly acknowledged agreement to reimburse for all advances granted, and pursuant to such agreement said applicant shall assign to the welfare board, as collateral … security for said advances, all or any part of his personal property as the board shall specify." * * * * * * * * "At any time the county welfare board may execute and file with the clerk of the court of common pleas or

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Banta v. Board of Trustees

    39 N.J. Eq. 123 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1884

    Nichols v. Disner, 5 Dutch. 293. The issuing of the execution after Maria Berry’s death without revivor was, at most, merely erroneous. Howard v. Pitt, 1 Salk. 261; Day v. Sharp, 4. Whart. 339; Hughes v. … McCa hill v. Equitable Life Ins. Soc., 11 C. E. Gr. 531; Shultz v. Sanders, 11 Stew. Eq. 154. In this case there was a formal order that the alias execution issue.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grace v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    71 N.J. Eq. 541 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 21, 1906

    State v. Crowley, 39 N. J. Law (10 Vr.) 264, 270 (Supreme Court, 1877). … Seymour v. Freer, 8 Wall. 202, 218 (1868).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brophy v. Board of Education

    12 N.J. Misc. 460 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1934

    Lewis, V. 0. The rights of the parties are before this court for the second time. … The deed on which the rights depend came before this court on a bill to quiet title, the decision in which is reported in Board of Education of West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N. J. Eq. 57; 106 Atl. Rep. 32 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.