Case law

Reilly v. Margate Trust Co.

127 N.J. Eq. 343 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 11, 1940

S. 54:9-9, the County Board of Taxation had determined the value of the common capital stock issued and outstanding and the amount of the tax levied thereon. … There is no record and no proof of any resolution of the board of directors of the bank assuming liability for the payment of the tax pursuant to R.

Hilles v. Parrish

14 N.J. Eq. 380 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1862

The resolutions of the board of directors, authorizing the transfer of the stock to themselves, were unauthorized and illegal. … Miller v. Ewer, 14 Shepley 509; Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Peters 588 ; Runyan v. The Lessee of Coster, 14 Peters 129 ; Angell & A. on Corp., § 104, 274.

Guise v. John C. Guise, Inc.

112 N.J. Eq. 11 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 28, 1932

Board of Education of Elizabeth v. Zinc, 101 N.J. Eq. 78 ; John A. Barwell, Inc., v. Vail, 108 N.J. Eq. 117 ; affirmed, 111 N.J. Eq. 431 . The appellant also relies upon an assignment of the fund. … In Board of Education of Linden v. Vail, 108 N.J.

Wilcoxen v. McCray

38 N.J. Eq. 466 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1884

Van Fleet, V. C. The complainant asks an injunction to restrain the defendant from using the words “ Norwood Hall,” as a sign on the boarding-house which she keeps at Asbury Park. … As was said by Lord Cottenham, in Spottiswoode v.

Middleton v. Steward

47 N.J. Eq. 293 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1890

The case of Beals’s Exr. v. Storm, 11 C. E. Gr. 372, is relied upon in the court below. … Scudder, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith,. Whitaker — 11.

Beck v. Edwards Lewis, Inc.

141 N.J. Eq. 326 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 11, 1948

United Box Board and Paper Co. ( Court of Chancery ), 72 N.J. Eq. 580 ; 66 Atl. Rep. 938 ; Zabriskie v. Hackensack and New York Railroad Co., supra. … Krassenstein was ever held out as having power or authority to sell corporate assets without formal action by the board of directors.

In re the Estate of Reisen

313 N.J. Super. 623 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 13, 1998

In re Trust of Brown, 213 N.J.Super. 489, 517 A.2d 893 (Law Div.1986). … See also Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 337 , 661 A.2d 1202 (1995); H.I.P. v. K Hovnanian, 291 N.J.Super. 144, 157 , 676 A.2d 1166 (Law Div.1996). As the Court stated in Argila v.

Seastream v. New Jersey Exhibition Co.

67 N.J. Eq. 178 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 22, 1904

Pitney, V. C. … In Bellamy v. Wells, 39 W. R. 158, cited in Barber v.

Muller v. Muller

76 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 14, 1909

Leaking, V. C. … Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Sturges, 33 N. J. Eq. (6 Stew.) 328, 337; Arnett v. Walsh’s Executors, 46 N. J. Eq. (1 Dick.) 543; 1 Dan.

Wildeman v. Wildeman

98 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 14, 1925

In Brown v. Brown, 82 N.J. Eq. 40 , Chancellor Walker reviews the cases on this point and cited Smith v. Smith . … "In Wheeler v.

Doremus v. Cameron

49 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Hopper v. Malleson, 1 C. E. Gr. 386; Campbell v. Howland, 5 C. E. Gr. 186 ; Morrow v. Dows, 1 Stew. Eq. 459; Trustees &c. v. Trenton, 3 Stew. Eq. 679; Howell v. The Essex Road Board, 5 Stew. Eq. 672; Lydecker v. … Corp. § 820; Hopper v. Malleson, 1 C. E. Gr. 382; State v. Jersey City, 7 Vr. 188 , 192 ; State v. Newark, 7 Vr. 288 ; Woodbridge v. Allen, 14 Vr. 262 ; Jones v. Landis Township, 21 Vr. 374 , 379.

Hey v. Seifert & Baime, Inc.

95 N.J. Eq. 502 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 21, 1923

And again in Southard v. Morris Canal, &c., 1 N. J. … And another application was made to the board of health of Newark to prevent it, which this board refused to do.

G. Loewus v. Highland Queen

125 N.J. Eq. 534 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 7, 1939

*Page 536 Wetherbee v. Baker, 35 N.J. Eq. 501 ; Cumberland Lumber Co. v. Clinton Hill Lumber Manufacturing Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 627 ; Hood v. McNaughton, 54 N.J. Law 425 . … Easton National Bank v. American Brick and Tile Co., supra; See v. Heppenheimer, 69 N.J. Eq. 36 ; Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co., 80 N.J. Eq. 122 ; 82 N.J. Eq. 364 ; Bryson v. Conlen, 104 N.J. Eq. 180 .

In Re Pfahler

102 N.J. Eq. 161 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1928

In Lippincott v. Lippincott, 97 N.J. … Ziezel v. Hutchinson, 91 N.J. Eq. 328 ; State v. Stigall, 22 N.J. Law 286 ; Wood v. Wood, 77 N.J. Eq. 593 ; Baird v. Baird, 18 N.J. Eq. 202 .

Smith v. Banister

127 N.J. Eq. 385 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 29, 1940

In Groel v. United Electric Company of New Jersey, 70 N. J. Eq. 616; 6. 1 Atl. … It asserts that upon the request of the complainant a meeting of the board of directors was called.

Whitehead v. Hamilton Rubber Co.

52 N.J. Eq. 78 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1893

Curtis v. Tyler, 9 Paige 432 ; Eastman v. Foster, 8 Metc. 19 ; Ten Eyck v. Holmes, 3 Sandf. 428 . … State v. Furgeson, 2 Vr. 123 , 124; Metropolitan Telegraph Co. v. Domestic Telegraph Co., 17 Stew. Eq. 568, 573; People v. Batchelor, 22 N. Y. 134 ; Commonwealth v. Cullen, 13 Pa. St. 133; Gordon v.

McGalliard v. Chapman

3 N.J. Misc. 609 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 3, 1925

Whatever might he the situation if this structure had no roof, it does, in fact, have a roof, which, although composed as to the outer covering only of canvas, is reinforced with boards underneath. … Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Clark, 2 N. J. Adv. R. 1690 (at p. 1693), and cases cited. Decree will be advised restraining the continuance of the violation.

Seaboard Trust Co. v. Shea

118 N.J. Eq. 433 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 25, 1935

shall constitute a quorum, for the transaction of the business of the board. … Stokes v. New Jersey Pottery Co., 46 N.J. Law 237 ; Mausert v. Christian Feigenspan, 68 N.J. Eq. 671 ; Savoy Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Royal Piece Dye Works, 103 N.J. Law 137 ; Elfenbein v.

Pennington v. Metropolitan Museum of Art

65 N.J. Eq. 11 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 14, 1903

May v. Bennett, *20 1 Russ. 370; Boyd v. Buckle, 10 Sim. 595; Booth v. Coulton, L. R. 5 Ch. App. 684; Baker v. Baker, ubi supra. … Curtiss v. Brown, 29 Ill. 201 .

Morgan Realty Co. v. Pazen

102 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 20, 1927

Binns v. Smith, 93 N.J. Eq. 33 (at p. 36 ); Brown v. Brown, 33 N.J. Eq. 650 (at p. 655 ); Bettcher v. Knapp, 94 N.J. Eq. 433 ; Quinn v. Amendola, 5 N.J. Mis. R. 932; Shaw v. Woodbury, 52 N.J. Law 7 . … Luskin v. Guttman, 98 N.J. Eq. 617 ; affirmed, 99 N.J. Eq. 887 ; Kudtz v. Busch, 3 N.J. Mis. R. 389; Bettcher v. Knapp, supra; Venino v. Naegele, 99 N.J. Eq. 183 ; Schneider v. Crawford, 99 N.J. Eq. 249 ; Zukman v.