Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
0.79s
68 N.J. Eq. 300 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 31, 1904
Browne Fraud. § 263; Johnson v. Hubbell, 10 N. J. Eq. (2 Stock.) 332; Gould v. Mansfield, 103 Mass. 408 ; Harder v. Harder, 2 Sandf. Ch. 17. … Browne Fraud. § 461 et seq.; Pom. Spec. Perf. § 106; Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. Eq. (6 Stew.) 650, 660; Lippincott v. Bridgewater, 55 N. J. Eq. (10 Dick.) 208, 210; Cochrane v. McEntee, 51 Atl. Rep. 279 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedAdministrators of White v. Williams
3 N.J. Eq. 376 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1835
His board, on the average, was two and a half months for twenty-two winters, and was worth two-dollars and fifty cents per week. … Where there is no memorandum or note made of the alteration, the time when it was made is a question of fact: Den v. Wright, 2 Hals. 175.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEinstein v. Raritan Woolen Mills
74 N.J. Eq. 624 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 21, 1908
Howell, V. C. … of directors and such officers and agents as the board should appoint.
Cited 6 timesPublished51 N.J. Eq. 29 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893
That the board of managers might lawfully delegate matters of such routine business to a committee is beyond question. Williams v. McKay, 13 Stew. Eq. 189; S. C., 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 36. … Rep. 431 ; Burnet v. Denniston, 5 Johns. Ch. 35 ; Burlew v. Hillman, 1 C. E. Gr. 23), but also to estop the institution or its receiver from now asserting a contrary meaning. Sumner v. Seaton, 2 Dick. Ch.
Cited 2 timesPublishedStockton v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.
54 N.J. Eq. 263 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896
Town of Bergen v. State, Van Horn, pros., 3 Vr. 490 , 493. … Franklin Township v. Nutley Water Co., 32 Atl. Rep. 381 , 384.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York & New Jersey Telephone Co. v. Inhabitants of East Orange
42 N.J. Eq. 490 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1887
have directly received such permission (but verbally only) from that board. … Trenton, 13 Vr. 487 ; Sutlerly v. Camden, 13 Vr. 496 ; Board of Comrs. v. MaGurrin, 6 Daly 349 ; State v. Glennon, 3 B. I. 376 ; Kittredge v. Milwaukee, 36 Wis. 46 ; see Sherman v. Milwaukee, 30 Wis. 93 ; Beaudette v.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1886
To the same effect are Lincoln v. Claflin, 7 Wall. 132 ; Cary v. Hotailing, 1 Hill 311 , and Butler v. … See, also, Bottomley v. United States, 1 Story 135 -144; Benham v. Cary, 11 Wend. 83 ; Jackson v. Timmerman, 12 Id. 299; Neff v. Landis (Pa.), 3 East. Rep. 162; S. C., 1 Cent. Rep. 133; Blake v.
Cited 0 timesPublished9 N.J. Eq. 312 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1853
In the case of Fiddle v. Evans, 1 Brown’s Reports 267, there was an agreement in writing between the parties that the bill should be dismissed, without costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished132 N.J. Eq. 56 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 17, 1942
Blount v. Moore, 54 Ala. 360 ; Van Winkle v. Fowler, 52 Hun. 355 ; Livingston v. Murray, 39 How. Prob. Pr. 102; Mathewson's Petition, 12 R.I. 145 ; Going v. Emery, 16 Pick. 107; Matter of Fox, 63 Barb. 157 ; Skinner v. … Scudder v. Vanarsdale, 13 N.J. Eq. 109 , 113 ; Fluke v. Fluke, 16 N.J. Eq. 478 , 480 ; Cook v. Cook, 20 N.J. Eq. 375 , 377 ; Hand v. Marcy, 28 N.J. Eq. 59 , 65 ; Clark v. *Page 58 Denton, 36 N.J. Eq. 419 ; Brown v.
Cited 5 timesPublished58 N.J. Eq. 125 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 11, 1899
Reed, V. C. … Beatty’s Administrator v. Montgomery, Executrix, 6 C. E. Gr. 324; Burdge v. Walling, 18 Stew. Eq. 10; Brown v. Lippincott, 4 Dick. Ch. Rep. 44.
Cited 3 timesPublished92 N.J. Eq. 130 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 26, 1920
Iszard v. Bodine, 9 N. J. Eq. 309; Haulenbeck v. Cronkright, 23 N. J. Eq. 407; Eckerson v. McCulloh, 1 Atl. Rep. 700 ; Blauvelt v. Ackerman, 23 N. J. Eq. 495; Warner v. Hill, 74 Atl. Rep. 973 ; Bagley & Sewall Co. v. … Traders Paper Board Co., 86 Atl. Rep. 1029 . As I find no- error the exceptions will be overruled, with costs.
Cited 6 timesPublished69 N.J. Eq. 636 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 10, 1905
. *638 The business is to be conducted by a board of trustees, elected at the annual parish meeting of the church. … New York Bay Cemetery Co. v. Buckmaster, 49 N. J. Law (20 Vr.) 449.
Cited 4 timesPublishedStevens v. United States Steel Corp.
68 N.J. Eq. 373 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 17, 1905
Stevenson, V. C. … Park v. Grant Locomotive Works, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished63 N.J. Eq. 100 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 8, 1902
In Dowdney et al. v. Mayor, &c., of New York City, 54, N. … Justice Andrews remarked: “The assessment is the basis upon which the board of supervisors act in apportioning the taxes, but it is in no sense an imposition of a charge upon the land described in the roll.”
Cited 3 timesPublished64 N.J. Eq. 65 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 1, 1902
Against this view the counsel for the accountant relied upon the cases of Davis v. Combs, 11 Stew. Eq. 473, and Pyatt v. Pyatt, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 285. In Davis v. … The case of Pyatt v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHardenburgh v. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank
3 N.J. Eq. 68 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1834
It was done in the cases of Weston v. the Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transpor tation Co., and Scudder v. the Trenton and Delaware Falls Co., Saxton, 696; and although no objections were made, they were received on the … That analogy is in favor of what I consider to have *75 been the practice in New-Jersey: Morphett v. Jones, 19 Ves. 350 ; Eden on Injunctions, 236, and the cases there cited.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCounty Park, C., Camden County v. Bigler
124 N.J. Eq. 378 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 26, 1938
Bigler, | Appellees, | | $10,165.00 Damages. v. Joseph Varbalow, | Atty. … McIntyre v. Easton and Amboy Railroad Co., 11 C.E. Gr. 425.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArcher v. American Water Works Co.
50 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892
Brush, v. … Featherstone v. Cook, L. R. (16 Eq.) 268; Trades Auxiliary Co. v. Vickers, L. R. (16 Eq.) 303; Einstein v. Rosenfeld, 11 Stew. Eq. 309.
Cited 2 timesPublished100 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1926
"To constitute the cruelty justifying a divorce from bed and board there must have been a violence causing a reasonable apprehension of danger of life, limb or health from further cohabitation. Close v. Close, 24 N.J. … Hewitt v. Hewitt, 37 Atl. Rep. 1011 . It is apparent, therefore, that these acts in themselves are not sufficient to sustain the allegation of extreme cruelty.
Cited 1 timesPublished142 N.J. Eq. 138 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 7, 1948
I am not unaware of the decisions of our Supreme Court such as Brown ads. Hendrickson, 39 N.J. Law 239 , and Schautz v. Kearney, 47 N.J. … However, Chancellor Walker, speaking for this court in Hoboken Trust Co. v. Norton, 90 N.J. Eq. 314 , 318 ; 107 Atl.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna