Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.79s

  • Lozier v. Hill

    68 N.J. Eq. 300 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 31, 1904

    Browne Fraud. § 263; Johnson v. Hubbell, 10 N. J. Eq. (2 Stock.) 332; Gould v. Mansfield, 103 Mass. 408 ; Harder v. Harder, 2 Sandf. Ch. 17. … Browne Fraud. § 461 et seq.; Pom. Spec. Perf. § 106; Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. Eq. (6 Stew.) 650, 660; Lippincott v. Bridgewater, 55 N. J. Eq. (10 Dick.) 208, 210; Cochrane v. McEntee, 51 Atl. Rep. 279 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Administrators of White v. Williams

    3 N.J. Eq. 376 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1835

    His board, on the average, was two and a half months for twenty-two winters, and was worth two-dollars and fifty cents per week. … Where there is no memorandum or note made of the alteration, the time when it was made is a question of fact: Den v. Wright, 2 Hals. 175.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Einstein v. Raritan Woolen Mills

    74 N.J. Eq. 624 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 21, 1908

    Howell, V. C. … of directors and such officers and agents as the board should appoint.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Keasbey v. Wilkinson

    51 N.J. Eq. 29 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

    That the board of managers might lawfully delegate matters of such routine business to a committee is beyond question. Williams v. McKay, 13 Stew. Eq. 189; S. C., 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 36. … Rep. 431 ; Burnet v. Denniston, 5 Johns. Ch. 35 ; Burlew v. Hillman, 1 C. E. Gr. 23), but also to estop the institution or its receiver from now asserting a contrary meaning. Sumner v. Seaton, 2 Dick. Ch.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stockton v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

    54 N.J. Eq. 263 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

    Town of Bergen v. State, Van Horn, pros., 3 Vr. 490 , 493. … Franklin Township v. Nutley Water Co., 32 Atl. Rep. 381 , 384.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York & New Jersey Telephone Co. v. Inhabitants of East Orange

    42 N.J. Eq. 490 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1887

    have directly received such permission (but verbally only) from that board. … Trenton, 13 Vr. 487 ; Sutlerly v. Camden, 13 Vr. 496 ; Board of Comrs. v. MaGurrin, 6 Daly 349 ; State v. Glennon, 3 B. I. 376 ; Kittredge v. Milwaukee, 36 Wis. 46 ; see Sherman v. Milwaukee, 30 Wis. 93 ; Beaudette v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilkinson v. Dodd

    42 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1886

    To the same effect are Lincoln v. Claflin, 7 Wall. 132 ; Cary v. Hotailing, 1 Hill 311 , and Butler v. … See, also, Bottomley v. United States, 1 Story 135 -144; Benham v. Cary, 11 Wend. 83 ; Jackson v. Timmerman, 12 Id. 299; Neff v. Landis (Pa.), 3 East. Rep. 162; S. C., 1 Cent. Rep. 133; Blake v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Quick

    9 N.J. Eq. 312 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1853

    In the case of Fiddle v. Evans, 1 Brown’s Reports 267, there was an agreement in writing between the parties that the bill should be dismissed, without costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Braun v. Muller

    132 N.J. Eq. 56 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 17, 1942

    Blount v. Moore, 54 Ala. 360 ; Van Winkle v. Fowler, 52 Hun. 355 ; Livingston v. Murray, 39 How. Prob. Pr. 102; Mathewson's Petition, 12 R.I. 145 ; Going v. Emery, 16 Pick. 107; Matter of Fox, 63 Barb. 157 ; Skinner v. … Scudder v. Vanarsdale, 13 N.J. Eq. 109 , 113 ; Fluke v. Fluke, 16 N.J. Eq. 478 , 480 ; Cook v. Cook, 20 N.J. Eq. 375 , 377 ; Hand v. Marcy, 28 N.J. Eq. 59 , 65 ; Clark v. *Page 58 Denton, 36 N.J. Eq. 419 ; Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McDowell v. Stiger

    58 N.J. Eq. 125 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 11, 1899

    Reed, V. C. … Beatty’s Administrator v. Montgomery, Executrix, 6 C. E. Gr. 324; Burdge v. Walling, 18 Stew. Eq. 10; Brown v. Lippincott, 4 Dick. Ch. Rep. 44.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Sandall

    92 N.J. Eq. 130 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 26, 1920

    Iszard v. Bodine, 9 N. J. Eq. 309; Haulenbeck v. Cronkright, 23 N. J. Eq. 407; Eckerson v. McCulloh, 1 Atl. Rep. 700 ; Blauvelt v. Ackerman, 23 N. J. Eq. 495; Warner v. Hill, 74 Atl. Rep. 973 ; Bagley & Sewall Co. v. … Traders Paper Board Co., 86 Atl. Rep. 1029 . As I find no- error the exceptions will be overruled, with costs.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Rahway Cemetery Co.

    69 N.J. Eq. 636 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 10, 1905

    . *638 The business is to be conducted by a board of trustees, elected at the annual parish meeting of the church. … New York Bay Cemetery Co. v. Buckmaster, 49 N. J. Law (20 Vr.) 449.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. United States Steel Corp.

    68 N.J. Eq. 373 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 17, 1905

    Stevenson, V. C. … Park v. Grant Locomotive Works, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hallinger v. Zimmerman

    63 N.J. Eq. 100 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 8, 1902

    In Dowdney et al. v. Mayor, &c., of New York City, 54, N. … Justice Andrews remarked: “The assessment is the basis upon which the board of supervisors act in apportioning the taxes, but it is in no sense an imposition of a charge upon the land described in the roll.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Keeney v. Henning

    64 N.J. Eq. 65 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 1, 1902

    Against this view the counsel for the accountant relied upon the cases of Davis v. Combs, 11 Stew. Eq. 473, and Pyatt v. Pyatt, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 285. In Davis v. … The case of Pyatt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hardenburgh v. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank

    3 N.J. Eq. 68 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1834

    It was done in the cases of Weston v. the Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transpor tation Co., and Scudder v. the Trenton and Delaware Falls Co., Saxton, 696; and although no objections were made, they were received on the … That analogy is in favor of what I consider to have *75 been the practice in New-Jersey: Morphett v. Jones, 19 Ves. 350 ; Eden on Injunctions, 236, and the cases there cited.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • County Park, C., Camden County v. Bigler

    124 N.J. Eq. 378 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 26, 1938

    Bigler, | Appellees, | | $10,165.00 Damages. v. Joseph Varbalow, | Atty. … McIntyre v. Easton and Amboy Railroad Co., 11 C.E. Gr. 425.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Archer v. American Water Works Co.

    50 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892

    Brush, v. … Featherstone v. Cook, L. R. (16 Eq.) 268; Trades Auxiliary Co. v. Vickers, L. R. (16 Eq.) 303; Einstein v. Rosenfeld, 11 Stew. Eq. 309.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Regan v. Regan

    100 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1926

    "To constitute the cruelty justifying a divorce from bed and board there must have been a violence causing a reasonable apprehension of danger of life, limb or health from further cohabitation. Close v. Close, 24 N.J. … Hewitt v. Hewitt, 37 Atl. Rep. 1011 . It is apparent, therefore, that these acts in themselves are not sufficient to sustain the allegation of extreme cruelty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Merewood, Inc. v. Denshaw

    142 N.J. Eq. 138 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 7, 1948

    I am not unaware of the decisions of our Supreme Court such as Brown ads. Hendrickson, 39 N.J. Law 239 , and Schautz v. Kearney, 47 N.J. … However, Chancellor Walker, speaking for this court in Hoboken Trust Co. v. Norton, 90 N.J. Eq. 314 , 318 ; 107 Atl.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.