Case law

Keeney v. Henning

58 N.J. Eq. 74 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 14, 1899

Pitney, V. C. … Alling v. Alling, 7 Dick. Ch. Rep. 92.

Clinton Station General Merchandise & Manufacturing Co. v. Hummell

25 N.J. Eq. 45 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1874

his Avorkmen in consideration of receiving from him the amount of their board. … Belford v. Crane, 1 C. E. Green 265; Skillman v. Skillman, 2 Beas. 403; Cramer v. Reford, 2 C. E. Green 367; Quidort’s Adm’r v. Pergeaux, 3 C. E. Green 472.

Cleine v. Englebrecht

41 N.J. Eq. 498 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1886

Bird, V. C. The complainant asks to have a deed, which she made and delivered to the defendant for the undivided one-half interest in two lots of land, set aside as fraudulent and void. … Brown, who told her that she had, and that he had seen the deed, and also told her that she had better employ some good lawyer. I do not think it is at all material to determine whether or not Mr.

Smith v. Speer

34 N.J. Eq. 336 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1881

Secor, 31 Mich. 185 ; Cooper v. Burr, 45 Barb. 9 ; Jones v. Selby, Prec. in Ch. 800; Stevens v. Stevens, 5 T. & C. (N. Y.) 87; Fowler v. Lockwood, 3 Bed/. 465; Jones v. Brown, 34 N. M.. 439, J/Jf5; Powell v. … Murray v. Cannon, 41 Md. 456 ; also, Taylor v. Henry, 48 Md. 550 ; Brown v. Brown, 23 Barb. 565 ; Homan Catholie Asylum, v. Strain, 2 Bradf. 34 ; Sheegog v. Perkins, 4 Baxter 273 .

Plaquemines Tropical Fruit Co. v. Buck

52 N.J. Eq. 219 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1893

Green, V. C. … V. (2d ed.) 596.

State v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg

83 N.J. Eq. 422 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 30, 1909

In Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 58 N. J. … State Board of Health v. Diamond Mills Paper Co., 63 N. J. Eq. 111, 117. In this case the proviso is adverted to, but was not under review and was not- considered.

In Re Caruba

142 N.J. Eq. 358 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 9, 1948

Ct. 332 ; Cook v. Board of Freeholders, c., 26 N.J. Law 326 , 327 , 331 et seq.; affirmed, 27 N.J. Law 637 ; In re Board of Pardons, 97 N.J. Eq. 555 , 559 , but the pardoning power does not apply to civil contempt. … Board of Freeholders, supra (at pp. 531 et seq ). The Chancellor has no power of pardon. That power is vested in the Governor of this State. Constitution 1947, article V, section II.

Ocean City Railroad Co. v. Bray

57 N.J. Eq. 164 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 3, 1897

Reed, V. C. … Mitchell, v. Tolan, 4 Vr. 195 .

Village of South Orange v. Heller

92 N.J. Eq. 505 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 11, 1921

Backus, V. C. This bill is filed by the village of South Orange to restrain the defendant from erecting a public garage in violation of its “zoning” ordinance. The legislature in 1920 (P. … The ordinance, the basis of this suit, forbids infringement except, to use the language of the ordinance, “without a special permit to be granted only upon resolution of the board of trustees and after a hearing.”

Wall v. Utah Copper Co.

70 N.J. Eq. 17 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 2, 1905

In the event the bond issue, as above, be authorized by the board of directors, then to authorize the calling of a stockholders’ meeting for the purpose of ratifying the action of the board of directors in authorizing and … One is Jones v. Concord and Montreal Railroad, 67 N. H. 119; 38 Atl. Rep. 120 . In the very recent case of Electric Company of America v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co., 200 Pa. St. 516; 50 Atl.

W.J. S.S.R.R. Co. v. Cape May County

105 N.J. Eq. 457 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 19, 1929

*Page 458 Delaware River Quarry and Construction Co. v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Mercer et al., 88 N.J. Eq. 506 . … Cramer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Salem County et al., 147 Atl. Rep. 639 . Second — Ober and Woolson.

James P. Hall Inc. v. Mayor of Jersey City

62 N.J. Eq. 489 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 27, 1901

PlTNBY, V. C. … That board of fire commissioners has an office or headquarters, and a clerk there in attendance. No member of the board attends at this office regularly.

Skinner v. Holmes

133 N.J. Eq. 593 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 24, 1943

The controversy has been submitted to the Board of Bishops of the African Methodist Episcopal Church in America but has not as yet received consideration. … Nevertheless, Vice-Chancellor Pitney, having considered the decisions in Whitecar v. Michenor, supra , and Lynd v. Menzies, supra , expressed the following conclusion in Everett v. First Presbyterian Church, 53 N.J.

Crawford v. Township of Maplewood

105 N.J. Eq. 416 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 26, 1929

Haughwout v. Murphy, 22 N.J. Eq. 531 ; Hermann, v. Petroleum Corp., 85 N.J. Eq. 367 ; Haupt Co. v. Board of Education of Edgewater ( Court of Errors and Appeals ), 87 N.J. Eq. 362 . … Board of Chosen Freeholders, 88 N.J.

Stanbery v. Baker

55 N.J. Eq. 270 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1897

Nolan v. Nolan (Chancellor McGill, MS., Conclusions). … Such right to strike out sham and frivolous pleas and demurrers in these courts has been expressly affirmed by our court of errors and appeals in Brown v.

Morris v. Ruddy

20 N.J. Eq. 236 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1869

Coleman v. Garrigues, 18 Barb. 60 ; Glentworth v. Luther, 21 Barb. 145 ; Roach v. Coe, 1 E. D. Smith 175. … Justice Brown expressly says that the broker has no authority to sign a contract of sale.

Buvinger v. Evening Union Printing Co.

72 N.J. Eq. 321 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1907

In Nugent v. McNeil Shoe Co., 62 N. J. Eq. (17 Dick.) 583, 585, the right to include outstanding book accounts in the lien of a mortgage is recognized. … In Campbell v. Taylor Manufacturing Co., 64 N. J.

Dover Trust Co. v. Brooks

111 N.J. Eq. 40 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 16, 1932

Hill v. Beach, 12 N.J. Eq. 31 ; Clements v. Jessup, 36 N.J. Eq. 569 ; Curtis v. Hollingshead, 14 N.J. Law 402 ; Brown v. Bissett, 21 N.J. Law 46 ; Allen Vail v. Agnew, 24 N.J. Law 443 ; Fox v. Cronan, 47 N.J. Law 493 . … Law 18 ) and in the event of severance, the joint owners become tenants in common and the right of survivorship ceases ( Allen v. Agnew, supra; Fox v. Cronan, supra; Morristown Trust Co. v. Capstick, 90 N.J.

Johnson v. Johnson

99 N.J. Eq. 190 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1926

In Day v. Day, 4 N.J. Eq. 444 , the chancellor quotes from the opinion of Lord Stowell in Williams v. Williams, 1 Hagg. … In the case of Alexander v. Alexander, 2 Swab.

Kerlin v. West

3 N.J. Eq. 449 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1844

Hart v. Mayor of Albany, 3 Paige, 214 ; Smallman v. Onions, 3 Brown, C. R. 623.