Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
1.19s
Henderson v. City of Atlantic City
64 N.J. Eq. 583 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 21, 1903
On the same day the same board made a grant of a larger tract, including the tract granted to the complainants, to the city of Atlantic City. … board is manifest, and that purpose was executed in making this grant.
Cited 10 timesPublished71 N.J. Eq. 123 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 19, 1906
What it sets up, and all that it sets up, is this: That after the deeláration and payment of these dividends, an entirely new board of directors was chosen; that such board, after being requested to sue, appointed a committee … In Dunphy v.
Cited 1 timesPublished18 N.J. Eq. 451 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1867
Wilson v. Brown, 2 Beas. 277. In this case it appears that the debt was contracted for the benefit of her separate estate; giving up a mortgage on it was for her advantage, and is a sufficient consideration.
Cited 0 timesPublished23 N.J. Eq. 13 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1872
Jur., *21 §§ 1201-1205; Guthrie v. Gardner, 19 Wend. 414 . … To the same effect are the decisions in Crop v. Norton, 2 Atk. 74; White v. Carpenter, 2 Paige 240 , and Sayre v. Townsend, 15 Wend. 647 . The doctrine is commented on and approved in Browne on Frauds, § 86.
Cited 2 timesPublishedProvident Institution for Savings v. Allen
37 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1883
Jersey City v *38 Vreeland, 14 Vr. 638 . … Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners, 13 Vr. 510 ; Bogert v. City of Elizabeth, 12 C. E. Gr. 568.
Cited 0 timesPublished113 N.J. Eq. 554 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 24, 1933
Vice-Chancellor Leaming, in Down v. Down, 80 N.J. Eq. 68 , has extensively quoted from the various text book writers, among others being 1 Lew. … Phillips v. Phillips, 81 N.J. Eq. 459 ; affirmed, 83 N.J. Eq. 345 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedInternational Union, C., C.I.O. v. Becherer
142 N.J. Eq. 561 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 31, 1948
The relationship is closely analogous to that considered by the Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of State Council, c. , v. Enterprise Council No. 6, 75 N.J. Eq. 245 . … These views are in accord with the opinion of this court in Schweitzer v. Schneider, 86 N.J. Eq. 88 ; affirmed ( Court of Errors and Appeals ), in Id. 256.
Cited 10 timesPublishedPublic Bancorporation v. Atlantic City Wimsett Thrift Co.
110 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1932
Ingersoll, V. C. … Crosby v. Stratton, supra; Eidman v. Bowman, supra; Real Estate Trust Co. v. Bird, 90 Md. 229 ; 44 Atl. Rep. 1048 ; Hammond v. Edison Illuminating Co., 131 Mich. 79 ; 90 N. W. Rep. 1040 ; Jones v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRandolph v. General Investors Co.
96 N.J. Eq. 227 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 29, 1924
Rittenhouse v. Swiecicki, 94 N.J. Eq. 36 ; see, also, Crane v. Peer, 43 N.J. Eq. 553 ; Brown v. Norcross, 59 N.J. Eq. 427 . … This contention is disposed of in the case of Gerba v. Mitruske, 84 N.J. Eq. 141 . Third. Defendants claim that the complainant has been guilty of laches.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTownship of Woodbridge v. Raritan Traction Co.
64 N.J. Eq. 169 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 28, 1902
Stevens, V. C. This seems to me to be a plain case. … The duty of erecting and maintaining bridges devolves upon the board of chosen freeholders. McKinley v. Chosen Freeholders of Union County, 2 Stew. Fq. 164; Whitall v. Freeholders of Gloucester County, 11 Vr. 302 .
Cited 0 timesPublished119 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 30, 1935
Brown recovered a judgment against Henry Bailey Tower in the East Orange district court and docketed it in the Essex common pleas November 3d 1932. … Gray v. Case, 51 N.J. Eq. 426 ; Straus v. Loudenslager, supra. The decree of this court in the suit of Tower v.
Cited 3 timesPublished83 N.J. Eq. 267 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 3, 1914
Griffin, V. C. The petition in above cause is filed for a divorce on the ground of desertion. The parties, who were acquainted from childhood, were married October 15th, 1907. … Provost v. Provost, 71 N. J. Eq. 204; affirmed, 73 N. J. Eq. 418; Foote v. Foote, 71 N. J. Eq. 273; McAllister v. McAllister, 71 N. J. Eq. 13. I am constrained to decree that the bill be dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCintas v. American Car Foundry Co.
131 N.J. Eq. 419 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1942
United States v. Reading Co., 253 U.S. 26 ; 40 S.Ct. 425 , 434 . This rule has been followed in New Jersey. Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 106 N.J. Law 536 ; Stockton v. Central Railroad Co., 50 N.J. Eq. 52 , 73 . … In the case of Ross v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedO'Brien v. Musical Mutual Protective & Benevolent Union, Local No. 14
64 N.J. Eq. 525 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 11, 1903
Emery, V. C. … The certificate appears to have been issued by the executive council or board. This board (by-laws, section 6) has a general supervision of all matters pertaining to the federation.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCavagnaro v. Indian Tire & Rubber Co.
90 N.J. Eq. 532 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 20, 1919
Cudahy Packing Co. v. New Jersey Dairy Products Co. (not yet reported); Kennedy v. American Tanning Co., 81 N. J. Eq. 109. … Hitchcock v. American Pipe and Construction Co., supra, and cases cited. *540 [Filed .May 23d, 1919.] Lane, V. C. (orally).
Cited 5 timesPublished63 N.J. Eq. 624 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 14, 1902
So far as the principles of the law applicable to this case need to be referred to, they may be found in Mills v. Davison, 9 Dick. Ch. … He meant to give the title of the gift to a board, but this board *629 should use and apply the gift, one-third part thereof for home missions and two-thirds parts thereof for foreign missions of the Baptist Church. .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBerdan v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners
82 N.J. Eq. 235 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 20, 1913
Plum v. Morris, &c., Canal Co. 10 N. J. Eq. (2 Stock.) 256; Allen v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 13 N. *242 J. Eq. (2 Beas.) 68; Pope v. Town of Union, 18 N. J. Eq. (3 C. E. Gr.) 282; Bond v. Newark, 19 N. J. Eq. (4 C. … Gr.) 247; McKinley v. Board, of Chosen Freeholders, 29 N. J. Eq. (2 Stew.) 164; Cape May Railroad Co. v. Cape May, 35 N. J. Eq. (8 Stew.) 419. In State v. Jersey City, 29 N. J.
Cited 7 timesPublished87 N.J. Eq. 124 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 17, 1916
The land conveyed was not worth more than $4,500, although the board of directors of the company appraised it at a valuation of $184,500. … Lewisohn v. Stoddard, 78 Conn. 575 ; Flash v. Connecticut, 109 U. S. 371 ; Whitman v. Oxford National Bank, 176 U. S. 559 ; Stoddard v. Lum, 159 N. Y. 265 ; Howarth v. Angle, 162 N. Y. 179 .
Cited 5 timesPublished99 N.J. Eq. 636 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 10, 1926
This case is very similar to that of Goater v. Ely, 80 N.J. … In Bridgewater v. Ocean City Railroad Co., 62 N.J.
Cited 3 timesPublished18 N.J. Eq. 251 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1867
Parker v. Gerard, Ambl. 236; Baring v. Nash, 1 Ves. & B. 556. … Manners v. Manners, 1 Green’s C. R. 384; Wilkin v. Wilkin, 1 Johns. C. R. 111; Coxe v. Smith, 4 Johns. C. R. 271; Dewitt v. Ackerman, 2 CV. E. Green 215; Blynman v. Brown, 2 Vern. 232.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna