Case law

LaMonte v. Lurich

86 N.J. Eq. 26 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 20, 1915

Just as well might the defendants object that at the time' the suit was instituted there were two boards, eacli claiming to be the rightful manager — one a de facto board, in actual control, and another a de jure board, entitled … This court could not, even in a direct proceeding, determine which was the legal board (Kean v. Union Water Co., 53 N. J.

Camden Trust Co. v. Toone

141 N.J. Eq. 342 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 24, 1948

Some other reported decisions are: Torrey v. Torrey, 55 N.J. Eq. 410 ; 36 Atl. Rep. 1084 ; Hoagland v. Cooper, 65 N.J. Eq. 407 ; 56 Atl. Rep. 705 ; Berans v. Berans, 69 N.J. Eq. 1 ; 59 Atl. Rep. 896 ; Brown v. … Brown, 72 N.J. Eq. 667 ; 65 Atl. Rep. 739 ; Kellogg v. Burnett, 74 N.J. Eq. 304 ; 69 Atl. Rep. 196 ; Hoe v. Hoe, 84 N.J. Eq. 401 ; 93 Atl. Rep. 882 ; Matlock v. Matlock, 98 N.J. Eq. 572 ; 131 Atl. Rep. 212 ; Brunyate v.

Wheeler v. Kirtland

23 N.J. Eq. 13 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1872

Jur., *21 §§ 1201-1205; Guthrie v. Gardner, 19 Wend. 414 . … To the same effect are the decisions in Crop v. Norton, 2 Atk. 74; White v. Carpenter, 2 Paige 240 , and Sayre v. Townsend, 15 Wend. 647 . The doctrine is commented on and approved in Browne on Frauds, § 86.

Collerd v. Huson

34 N.J. Eq. 38 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

Hackett, 30 Minn. 106 ; Salmon v. Clagetb, 3 Bland 135 ; Mussina v. Bartlett, 8 Port 877; Baker v. Lehman, Wright 538; King v. Longworth, 7 Ohio 131 ; or for one of several notes, Johnson v. Brown, 31 N. … A payment of the installment terminates the suit, Brown v. Thompson, 29 Mich. 72 ; see Dow v. Moor, 59 Me. 118 . A mortgage may be foreclosed for interest before the principal is due, Van Doren v. Dickerson, 6 Stew.

Rusch v. Melosh

133 N.J. Eq. 502 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 26, 1943

Welsh v. Brown, 43 N.J. Law 37 ; Caldwell National Bank v. Rickard, 103 N.J. *Page 509 Eq. 516; 143 Atl. Rep. 745 ; Rowe v. Rowe, 113 N.J. Eq. 344 ; 167 Atl. Rep. 16 ; Gates v. Plainfield Trust Co., 121 N.J. … In Board of Education of the Borough of West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N.J. Eq. 57 ; 106 Atl.

Lewis v. Morgan

132 N.J. Eq. 343 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 24, 1942

Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N.J. Eq. 451 ; Schomp v. Schenck, 40 N.J. Law 195 ; Porter v. Bergen, 54 N.J. Eq. 405 ; 34 Atl. Rep. 1067 ; Kelley v. Schwinghammer, 78 N.J. Eq. 437 ; 79 Atl. Rep. 260 ; Raimondi v. … Brown v. Bulkley, supra; Porter v. Bergen, supra; Kelley v. Schwinghammer, supra; Grimm v. Franklin, supra. The bill is manifestly fashioned to invoke this constituent of equitable jurisdiction.

Hemsley v. Bew

53 N.J. Eq. 241 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1895

Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 18 Stew. Eq. 393, 402. … Eq. 605; Haggerty v. Lee, 18 Stew. Eq. 255; Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 553. The order to show cause will be discharged..

Gordon v. Griffith

113 N.J. Eq. 554 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 24, 1933

Vice-Chancellor Leaming, in Down v. Down, 80 N.J. Eq. 68 , has extensively quoted from the various text book writers, among others being 1 Lew. … Phillips v. Phillips, 81 N.J. Eq. 459 ; affirmed, 83 N.J. Eq. 345 .

Siegman v. Kissel

71 N.J. Eq. 123 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 19, 1906

What it sets up, and all that it sets up, is this: That after the deeláration and payment of these dividends, an entirely new board of directors was chosen; that such board, after being requested to sue, appointed a committee … In Dunphy v.

Citizens Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. Coriell

34 N.J. Eq. 383 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1881

In Hodges v. New England Screw Company, 1 R. … The president of the board elected in 1878 (by the direction of which board this- *395 suit was brought), Mr. Harris, borrowed on such security in 1869, and Mr.

McKinley v. Chosen Freeholders

29 N.J. Eq. 164 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

Hurlburt, 22 Conn. 178 ; Gillespie v. Freeman, 7 La. An. 350; Hickok v. Hine, 23 Ohio St. 523 . A covering of boards over a ditch dug by a city for its own use, was held to be a bridge. 1lusch v. … Two different boards have concurred in deciding that a bridge on this site is necessary. No wrongful purpose is imputed to the first.

Summers v. Morley

95 N.J. Eq. 505 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 21, 1924

Brown v. Murray, 94 N. J. Eq. 125. This, it seems to me, is dispositive of the case. Another question has been raised by counsel, and that is *507 that Mrs. … The law in this matter is so well settled that I will only cite the case of Semenowich v. Melnyk, 93 N. J. Eq. 615. I will therefore advise a decree dismissing- the bill.

Barnett v. Pension Com., C., Atlantic City

100 N.J. Eq. 473 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 21, 1927

The reference in Pennie v. … State v. Jersey City, 42 N.J. Law 97 .

Cintas v. American Car Foundry Co.

131 N.J. Eq. 419 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1942

United States v. Reading Co., 253 U.S. 26 ; 40 S.Ct. 425 , 434 . This rule has been followed in New Jersey. Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 106 N.J. Law 536 ; Stockton v. Central Railroad Co., 50 N.J. Eq. 52 , 73 . … In the case of Ross v.

Earle v. American Sugar Refining Co.

74 N.J. Eq. 751 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 15, 1908

Walker, V. C. … These cases of States v. Durkin and Kenny v. Collier were contract cases, but Dudley v. Briggs, 141 Mass. 582 ; 6 N. E. Rep. 717; 55 Am.

New York Trust Co. v. Shelburne, Inc.

110 N.J. Eq. 187 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 16, 1932

Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co., 91 N. J. Eq. 86; Myers v. Brown, 92 N. J. Eq. 348; New Order Building and Loan Association v. 222 Chancellor Avenue, 106 N. J. Eq. 1. … Brown, supra (at p. 351); by Chief-Justice Gummere, speaking for the-court of errors and appeals, in Henn v. Hendricks, 104 N. J. Eq. 166, and by Mr.

Public Bancorporation v. Atlantic City Wimsett Thrift Co.

110 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1932

Ingersoll, V. C. … Crosby v. Stratton, supra; Eidman v. Bowman, supra; Real Estate Trust Co. v. Bird, 90 Md. 229 ; 44 Atl. Rep. 1048 ; Hammond v. Edison Illuminating Co., 131 Mich. 79 ; 90 N. W. Rep. 1040 ; Jones v.

Vogt v. Vogt

105 N.J. Eq. 566 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1930

The co-respondent, Leopold Bauer, who has intervened denying the charges alleged, roomed and boarded with the parties. … Story v. Story, 91 N.J. Eq. 515 ; Lasker v. Lasker, 91 N.J. Eq. 352 ; Rogers v. Rogers, 89 N.J. Eq. 1 ; Wines v. Wines, 97 N.J. Eq. 55 ; Riehl v. Riehl, 101 N.J. Eq. 15 .

Fleisher v. West Jersey Securities Co.

84 N.J. Eq. 55 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 21, 1914

Appleton v. American Malting Co., 65 N. J. Eq. 375. … v.

Thompson v. Thompson

89 N.J. Eq. 70 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 5, 1918

Fairchild *77 v. Fairchild, 53 N. J. Eq. 678; Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457 ; Wisconsin v. Pelican Ins. Co., 127 U. S. 265 ; Andrews v. Andrews, supra; German Savings Society v. Dormitzer, 192 U. … S. 125 ; National Bank v. Wiley, 195 U. S. 257 ; Wallace v. Wallace, supra; Watkinson v. Watkinson, supra.