Case law

Nolan v. Kirchner

98 N.J. Eq. 452 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1925

The cases in this state supporting that view are the following: Crane v. Peer, supra; Brown v. Norcross, 59 N. *Page 454 J. Eq. 427; Avon-by-the-Sea Land Improvement Co. v. Thompson, supra; Myers v. … Eq. 300 ; Resnick v. Campbell, 68 N.J. Eq. 348 ; American Ice Co. v. Lynch, 74 N.J. Eq. 298 ; Porter v. Williams, 93 N.J. Eq. 88 ; affirmed, Ibid. 505; Rittenhouse v. Swiecicki, 94 N.J. Eq. 36 ; Coltinuk v.

Central Bus Operators, Inc. v. Central Avenue Bus Owners Ass'n

127 N.J. Eq. 144 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 14, 1940

Berkhout v. Royal Arcanum, 33 Vr. 103 ; Sibley v. Carteret Club of Elizabeth, 11 Id. 295.” See D’Aloia v. Unione Fratellanza Italiana of Vineland, 84 N. J. Law 683; 87 Atl. Rep. 472 . … Vandermade v. Appert, 125 N. J. Eq. 366; 5 Atl. Rep. (2d) 868; Cohen v. Cohen, 121 N. J. Eq. 299; 188 Atl. Rep. 244 ; Micheloni v. Troy Mills, Inc., 121 N. J. Eq. 117; 187 Atl. Rep. 168 ; Jaeger v.

Driggs v. Garretson

25 N.J. Eq. 178 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1874

Brown v. Van Dyke, 4 Halst. Ch. 795; Gilb. For. Rom. 56. … Pr. 101; Roche v. Morgell, 2 Sch. & Lef. 721. This plea is defective in this respect, and therefore must be overruled. Leave will be given, however, to amend.

Lynde v. Lynde

54 N.J. Eq. 473 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1896

Brown Jur. § 11; 2 Bish. Mar., D. & S. § 844; Browne Div. 267. … Anshutz v. Anshutz, 1 C. E. Gr. 162; Miller v. Miller, Sax. 386; Yule v. Yule, 2 Stock. 138 ; Cory v. Cory, 3 Stock. 400 ; Rockwell v. Morgan, 2 Beas. 119, 121. The nineteenth section of our statute (Gen.

Miller v. Ford

1 N.J. Eq. 358 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1831

Eldon, vide Renison v. Ashley, 2 Ves. jr. 459; Ryves v. Ryves, 3 Fes. 343; Muckleston v. Brown, 6 Ves. 63; Baker v. Mellish, 10 Ves. 544; Attorney General v. … Brown, 1 Swanst. 294; by Sir Thomas Plumer, vice-chancellor, in the case of Armitage v. Wadsworth, 1 Mad. Rep. 110; and by Sir William Grant, the master of the rolls, in Jones v. Jones, 3 Mer. 161.

Geller v. Johnsen

95 N.J. Eq. 516 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 6, 1924

Brown v. Murray, 94 N. J. Eq. 125. … It is sufficient to cite the case of Atlantic Refining Co. v. Stokes, 77 N. J. Eq. 119, which holds in effect .that an individual who is in failing circumstances can prefer one of his creditors.

Vogt v. Vogt

105 N.J. Eq. 566 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1930

The co-respondent, Leopold Bauer, who has intervened denying the charges alleged, roomed and boarded with the parties. … Story v. Story, 91 N.J. Eq. 515 ; Lasker v. Lasker, 91 N.J. Eq. 352 ; Rogers v. Rogers, 89 N.J. Eq. 1 ; Wines v. Wines, 97 N.J. Eq. 55 ; Riehl v. Riehl, 101 N.J. Eq. 15 .

Bermes v. Kelley

108 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 8, 1931

Cortleyeu v. Hathaway, 11 N.J. Eq. 39 ; Coddington v. Bispham's Executors, 36 N.J. Eq. 574 ; Leeds v. Gifford, 41 N.J. Eq. 464 ; New Jersey Title Guarantee and Trust Co. v. Cone Co., 64 N.J. … Eq. 86 ; Myers v. Brown, 92 N.J. Eq. 348 ; affirmed, 93 N.J. Eq. 196 ; Paramount Building and Loan Association v. Sacks, 107 N.J. Eq. 328 ; Stanton v. Metropolitan Lumber Co., Ibid. 345 .

Houston v. of Will of Levy

44 N.J. Eq. 6 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1888

Thompson v. Brown, 4 Johns. Ch. 619 ; Kennedy v. Creswell, 101 U. S. 641 ; Mallory v. Craige, 2 McCart. 73; Coddington v. Rispham, 9 Stew. Eq. 574. … Mallory v. Craige, 2 McCart. 73; Thompson v. Brown, 4 Johns. Ch. 619 .

Miller v. Miller

80 N.J. Eq. 47 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 16, 1912

Garrison, V. C. This is a bill filed by the administratrix of Alexander Miller, deceased, against Gordon D. … Prior to September, 1902, Alexander Miller was engaged with one Brown,, in the business of building and repairing ships, machinery and other like operations, under the firm name of Brown & Miller, carrying on their business

Newman v. Landrine

14 N.J. Eq. 291 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

Anonymous, 2 Dickens 776; Weeks v. Cole, 14 Vesey 517; Dyott v. Dyott, 1 Mad. 179 (Am. ed.); 1 Daniell’s Pr. 36; 1 Smith’s Pr. 558; 1 Hoffman’s Pr. 200. … Meliorucchy v. Meliorucchy, 2 Vesey, sen. 24; Craig v. Bolton, 2 Brown C. C. 609; Dyott v. Dyott, 1 Mad. *293 109 (Am. ed.); Prior v. White, 2 Molloy 361; Long v. Tardy, 1 Johns. Ch. R. 202; Goodrich v.

Potter v. Watkins

104 N.J. Eq. 13 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 19, 1928

In Leavenworth v. … See Capital Circle v. Schmitt, 84 N.J. Eq. 95 . In Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J. Eq. 667 , Vice-Chancellor Garrison held taxes on land to be payable by the executor out of the estate.

Morehouse v. Keyport Auto Sales Co., Inc.

118 N.J. Eq. 368 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1935

Peoples State Bank of Michigan Valley v. Brown, 80 Kan. 520 ; 103 Pac. Rep. 102 ; 23 L.R.A. ( N.S. ) 824 , citing Hodgson v. Barrett, 33 Ohio St. 63 ; National Bank v. Chicago, B. N.R. … Peoples State Bank of Michigan Valley v. Brown, supra.

Campbell v. Hough

73 N.J. Eq. 601 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 17, 1908

Keator v. Brown, ubi supra, 602. … This he could doubtless do under the authority of Keator v. Brown, supra.

Mallory's Administrator v. Craige

15 N.J. Eq. 73 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1862

Thomson v. Brown, 4 Johns. C. R. 630, 643; 1 Story’s Eq. Jur., § 543 a, § 546 and note 2; Ram. on Assets, chap. 24, § 2.

Provident Institution for Savings v. Allen

37 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1883

Jersey City v *38 Vreeland, 14 Vr. 638 . … Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners, 13 Vr. 510 ; Bogert v. City of Elizabeth, 12 C. E. Gr. 568.

Woodruff v. Woodruff

44 N.J. Eq. 349 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Perf. § 149; McKibbon v. Brown, 1 McCart. 13; S. C., 2 MeCart. 498. … Perf. 163; McKibbin v. Brown, supra.

Elkins v. Camden & Atlantic Railroad

36 N.J. Eq. 5 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1882

The bill states that it is the purpose of the defendant and its board of directors, in its name and with its funds, either to purchase of the Philadelphia and Atlantic City Railway Company its railroad (which runs, as does … It is enough to warrant the interference of this court to know that it is the-admitted intention of the board to execute the illegal agreement, provided the holders of a majority of the stock are favorable to it.

Tracy v. Tracy

60 N.J. Eq. 25 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 22, 1900

And, repeating the language quoted in McGean v. McGean from the opinion of the court of errors and appeals in Magowan v. Magowan, 12 Dick. Ch. … She then returned to Newark, and took board with a Mrs. Osborne, at No.

Bd. of Ed., Northampton Twp. v. Gibbs

101 N.J. Eq. 442 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 16, 1927

By this contract defendant Gibbs agreed, inter alia , to "Provide a satisfactory bond, in the full amount of his contract, executed upon the blank form in use by the board, by a surety company acceptable to the board and … the one calendar year's guarantee required in the prompt payment of all persons furnishing materials or labor, or both, required for the prosecuting of the work, and the defending and settlement, without expense to the board