Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

1.03s

  • Morris v. Hussong Dyeing Machine Co.

    81 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 22, 1913

    Emery, V. C. … Prall v. Tilt (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1877), 28 N. J.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fogg v. Ocean City Sewer Co.

    72 N.J. Eq. 736 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 11, 1907

    Bloomfield v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Middlesex County, 74 N. J. … Fogg v. Ocean City, 74 N. J. L. (45 Vr.) 362 (Supreme Court, 1907).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Marsh

    13 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1861

    Aldrich v. Sharp, 3 Scammon 261; Wernwag v. Brown, 3 Blackf. 457 ; Mason v. Cake, Breese 52. … Eq. 424, note a; 5 Gray’s R. 9, Barringer v. King; 2 Mad. Ch. Pr. 455; 6 Johns. R. 283, Watson v. Fuller; 2 Chitty’s Dig. “ Interest,” as to Practice in Eng. Eq.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Bank of the Metropolis v. Sprague

    20 N.J. Eq. 13 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1869

    Beeckman v. Montgomery, 1 McCarter 106; Crane v. Reford, supra; Case v. Phelps, 39 N. Y. R. 164. On both these grounds, Mrs. … Swift v. Hart, 12 Barb. 530 ; Thompson v. Van Vechten, 27 N. Y. R. 582; Herrick v. King, 4 C. E. Green 82.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Spoerer

    139 N.J. Eq. 186 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 10, 1947

    The Board of Adjustment found none. The protests of those appearing at the hearing was, in effect, that the operation of the bakery was too noisy. … Iannella v. Piscataway Township, 138 N.J. Eq. 598 ; 49 Atl. Rep. 2d 491. The defendants' contention that the complainants' remedy is by certiorari in a law action is without force under the existing facts.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. Rahway Ice Co.

    64 N.J. Eq. 596 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 26, 1903

    It comes within the principle of Gardner v. Butler, 3 Stew. Eq. 702. Oliver and his brother were directors present at the meeting of the board at which the sale of the stock was sanctioned. … Referring to the case of the Aberdeen Railway Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gillies v. Pappas Brothers

    138 N.J. Eq. 202 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 17, 1946

    Where there is a gross abuse of trust, or dissension among the members of the board of directors or stockholders, or the absence of a properly constituted board of directors, there may be the necessity of judicial intervention … Morse v. Metropolitan Steamship Co., 87 N.J. Eq. 217 ; 100 Atl. Rep. 219 ; modified, 88 N.J. Eq. 325 ; 102 Atl. Rep. 524 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Domestic Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.

    39 N.J. Eq. 160 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1884

    McKibbin v. Brown, 1 McCart. 1; S. C., on Appeal, 2 McCart. 498; Potts v. Whitehead, 5 C. E. Gr. 55; 8 C. E. *165 Gr. 512; Whitlock v. Duffield, 1 Hoff. Ch. 110 ; S. C., on Appeal, 26 Wend. 55 ; Waterman on Spec. … Brown v. Brown, 6 Stew. Eq. 650.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Zudiak v. Szuryk

    93 N.J. Eq. 559 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 2, 1922

    In Brown v. Garton, 86 N. J. Eq. 289, I held: “Partition is a matter of right only when the complainant is sui juris. … Bentley v. Long Dock Co., 14 N. J. Eq. 480.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • The Pa. v. Bd. of Nat'l Missions

    139 N.J. Eq. 71 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 9, 1946

    In Blanchard v. Blanchard, 116 N.J. Eq. 435 ; affirmed, 122 N.J. Eq. 372 , and in Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Lowy, 123 N.J. … Eq. 423 ; Wild v. Brown, 120 N.J. Eq. 31 ; In re Ward, 121 N.J. Eq. 555 ; affirmed, 121 N.J. Eq. 606 ; The Morris Community Chest v. Wilentz, 124 N.J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Realty Title & Mortgage Co. v. Schaaf

    81 N.J. Eq. 115 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 24, 1912

    Wilson v. Brown, 13 N. J. Eq. (2 Beas.) 277; Harrison v. Stewart, 18 N. J. Eq. (3 C. E. Gr.) 451; Armstrong v. Ross, 20 N. J. Eq. (5 C. E. Gr.) 109; Homœpathic Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Marshall, 32 N. J. … Pentz v. Simonson, 13 N. J. Eq. (2 Beas.) 232, 235; Pierson v. Lum, 25 N. J. Eq. (10 C. E. Gr.) 390.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re the dissolution & liquidation of the Foundation Building & Loan Ass'n

    122 N.J. Eq. 549 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 19, 1937

    Attorney-General v. Moore’s Executors (Court of Errors and Appeals), 119 N. J. Eq. 503; Traphagen v. Levy, 45 N. J. Eq. 448. … The powers here implied have been exercised by boards of directors of active building and loan associations. See Caldwell Building and Loan Association v. Henry, 120 N. J. Eq. 425.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richman v. Richman

    117 N.J. Eq. 226 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 20, 1934

    In Brown v. Brown, 33 N.J. Eq. 650 , the court of errors and appeals held: "A specific performance will not be decreed unless the existence and terms of the contract be clearly proved." … And to like effect is Shipman v. Shipman, 65 N.J. Eq. 556 , and Lippincott v. Bridgewater, 55 N.J. Eq. 208 . In Nibert v. Baghurst, 47 N.J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Smith

    72 N.J. Eq. 777 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1907

    Brown v. Ryder, 42 N. J. Eq. (15 Stew.) 356. Operative probate was not effected until the termination of these appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Geller v. Johnsen

    95 N.J. Eq. 516 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 6, 1924

    Brown v. Murray, 94 N. J. Eq. 125. … It is sufficient to cite the case of Atlantic Refining Co. v. Stokes, 77 N. J. Eq. 119, which holds in effect .that an individual who is in failing circumstances can prefer one of his creditors.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Joachim v. Belfus

    107 N.J. Eq. 240 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 18, 1930

    In activity a corporation is managed by a board of directors; in dissolution by a board of trustees — the former directors. … Dill v. Board of Education, 47 N.J. Eq. 421 ; Raritan Water Power Co. v. Veghte, supra; Johnston v. Hyde, 33 N.J. Eq. 632 ; Arlington Realty Co. v. Keller, 105 N.J. Eq. 196 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Chadwick v. Island Beach Co.

    42 N.J. Eq. 602 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1887

    The case of Wade v. Miller, 3 Vr. 296 , is quite in point. … See, also, Kirkpatrick v. Corning, 11 Stew. Eq. 234.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nolan v. Kirchner

    98 N.J. Eq. 452 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1925

    The cases in this state supporting that view are the following: Crane v. Peer, supra; Brown v. Norcross, 59 N. *Page 454 J. Eq. 427; Avon-by-the-Sea Land Improvement Co. v. Thompson, supra; Myers v. … Eq. 300 ; Resnick v. Campbell, 68 N.J. Eq. 348 ; American Ice Co. v. Lynch, 74 N.J. Eq. 298 ; Porter v. Williams, 93 N.J. Eq. 88 ; affirmed, Ibid. 505; Rittenhouse v. Swiecicki, 94 N.J. Eq. 36 ; Coltinuk v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Central Bus Operators, Inc. v. Central Avenue Bus Owners Ass'n

    127 N.J. Eq. 144 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 14, 1940

    Berkhout v. Royal Arcanum, 33 Vr. 103 ; Sibley v. Carteret Club of Elizabeth, 11 Id. 295.” See D’Aloia v. Unione Fratellanza Italiana of Vineland, 84 N. J. Law 683; 87 Atl. Rep. 472 . … Vandermade v. Appert, 125 N. J. Eq. 366; 5 Atl. Rep. (2d) 868; Cohen v. Cohen, 121 N. J. Eq. 299; 188 Atl. Rep. 244 ; Micheloni v. Troy Mills, Inc., 121 N. J. Eq. 117; 187 Atl. Rep. 168 ; Jaeger v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Newman v. Landrine

    14 N.J. Eq. 291 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

    Anonymous, 2 Dickens 776; Weeks v. Cole, 14 Vesey 517; Dyott v. Dyott, 1 Mad. 179 (Am. ed.); 1 Daniell’s Pr. 36; 1 Smith’s Pr. 558; 1 Hoffman’s Pr. 200. … Meliorucchy v. Meliorucchy, 2 Vesey, sen. 24; Craig v. Bolton, 2 Brown C. C. 609; Dyott v. Dyott, 1 Mad. *293 109 (Am. ed.); Prior v. White, 2 Molloy 361; Long v. Tardy, 1 Johns. Ch. R. 202; Goodrich v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.