Case law

General Proprietors of Eastern Division v. Force's Executors

72 N.J. Eq. 56 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1896

Arnold v. Mundy, 6 N. J. Law (1 Halst.) 11; Den v. Sharp, 4 Wash. C. C. 609 ; Baeder v. Jennings, 40 Fed. Rep. 199; Estell v. Land Company, 35 N. J. Law (6 Vr.) 235; Jennings v. Burnham, 56 N. J. Law (27 Vr.) 289. … Part. 299, 300; Attorney-General v. Wilson, Craig & P. 1 (at p. 28); Cunningham v. Pell, 5 Paige 607, 612 ; Miller v. Fenton, 11 Paige 18 ; Walker v. Symonds, 3 Swan 75 ; Wilkinson v. Dodd, 40 N. J.

Wallace v. Wallace

62 N.J. Eq. 509 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1901

Chancellor Zabriskie does, indeed, say of Brown v. Brown, in Coddington v. Coddington, 5 C. E. … It was held by Chancellor Green, in Brown v.

Heller v. Sweeney

100 N.J. Eq. 150 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 9, 1926

In McKibben v. Brown, 14 N.J. Eq. 13 , Chancellor Green said: "No specific performance of a contract can be decreed in equity unless the contract be actually concluded and be certain in all its parts." … McKibben v. Brown, 14 N.J. Eq. 13 ; affirmed, 15 N.J. Eq. 498 ; Potter v. Hollister, 45 N.J. Eq. 508 ; affirmed, 46 N.J. Eq. 609 ; Meyers v. Metzger, 63 N.J. Eq. 779 ; Doutney v. Lambie, 78 N.J. Eq. 277 ; Van Riper v.

Cortelyou v. Hoagland

40 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1885

Brown St. Fr. § 161; Apgar v. Hiler, 4 Zab. 812; Thompson v. Coleman, 1 South. *216. There is clearly an adequate remedy at law, and no reason for recourse to equity. The demurrers will be allowed.

Kerlin v. West

4 N.J. Eq. 449 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1844

Hart v. Mayor of Albany, 3 Paige, 214 : Smallman v. Onions, 3 Brown, C. R. 623.

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Job Haines Home for Aged People

127 N.J. Eq. 518 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 18, 1940

In Bulkeley v. Worthing Ion Ecclesiastical Society (Conn.), 63 Atl. … Traverso v. Traverso, 99 N. J. Eq. 514; 101 N. J. Eq. 308. The Board of Relief for Ministers shares in the gift of $5,000 after the death of Theodore T. Crane.

Schreiber v. Drosness

100 N.J. Eq. 123 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 29, 1926

Laird v. Atlantic Coast Co., 73 N.J. Eq. 5 ; Ashby v. Yetter, 78 N.J. Eq. 173 ; Robinson v. Robinson, 86 N.J. Eq. 165 ; Bijur Motor Co. v. International Association, c., 92 N.J. Eq. 183 . … Counsel for the complainants further urges, on the authority of Roseberg v. American Hotel Co., 95 N.J.

Rowland v. New York Stable Manure Co.

88 N.J. Eq. 168 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 10, 1917

Board of Health v. Neidt, 19 Atl. Rep. 318 ; State v. Freeholders of Bergen, 46 N. J. Eq. 173; Board of Health v. Lederer, 52 N. J. Eq. 675. … Board of Health v. Lederer, supra; Society v. Low, 17 N. J. Eq. 19, Carlisle v. Cooper, supra; Brady v. Weeks, 3 Bab. 157; Wood Nuis. § 18, foot-note cases. Nor are the complainants equitably estopped by acquiescence.

Patsourakos v. Kolioutos

132 N.J. Eq. 87 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 29, 1942

Chancellor Dickerson had declared, in Stevenson v. Brown, 4 N.J. … Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. v. Brown, 30 N.J. Eq. 193 ; affirmed, sub nom. Brown v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance *Page 93 Co., 32 N.J. Eq. 809 . See, also, Reeves v. Cooper, 12 N.J.

Wolcott v. Waldstein

86 N.J. Eq. 63 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 16, 1916

Gilson v. Appleby, 79 N. J. Eq. 590, and Easton National Bank v. American Brick Co., 69 N. J. Eq. 326; 70 N. J. … Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co., 80 N. J. Eq. 122; 82 N. J. Eq. 364, is of the latter nature.

Geo. Wa. v. the Memorial

139 N.J. Eq. 280 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 29, 1947

The same rule was laid down in the case of City of Clifton v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 133 N.J. Law 379 ; 44 Atl. Rep. 2d 102. … The Cemetery Association board and the Development Company board undoubtedly were interlocking boards of trustees and directors.

Reed v. Helois Carbide Specialty Co.

64 N.J. Eq. 231 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1903

Grey, V. C. This is a foreclosure case. The complainants’ mortgage is disputed by the mortgagor company and by Frank A. … Boney v. Williams, 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 699. For this reason the $5,000 part of the complainants’ mortgage must be rejected.

Wemple v. B.F. Goodrich Co.

125 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 27, 1939

This precise situation was presented in the case of Baird v. The Board of Recreation Commissioners, 108 N.J. Eq. 91 (at p. 112 ); 154 Atl. … Brown v. Ely, 92 N.J. Eq. 487 ; 113 Atl. Rep. 698 . "Strict performance of a contract may be waived by the vendor. Isbill v. Duffy, 110 N.J. Eq. 429 ; 160 Atl. Rep. 326 . "In Kerny v. Johnson, 104 N.J.

Polkowitz v. Nash

87 N.J. Eq. 489 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 30, 1917

Brown ads. Combs, 29 N. J. Law 37; Cooper v. Cooper, 36 N. J. Eq. 121. … Gaston v. American Exchange National Bank, 29 N. J. Eq. 98; Aller v. Crouter, 64 N. J. Eq. 381.

Raimondi v. Bianchi

100 N.J. Eq. 238 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 1, 1926

Glover v. Hedges, 1 N.J. Eq. 113 ; Powers v. Butler, 4 N.J. Eq. 465 ; Tompkins v. Tompkins, 11 N.J. Eq. 512 ; Dunn v. Dunn, 42 N.J. Eq. 431 . … Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N.J. Eq. 451 ; Porter v. Bergen, 54 N.J. Eq. 405 .

Campion v. Kille

14 N.J. Eq. 229 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

Brown and Goodwin, the attaching creditors, claim priority over the mortgage by virtue of their attachment. 1. … Lowe v. Waller, Douglas 736; Richards v. Brown, Cowper 770; Barker v. Vansommer, 1 Bro. C. C. 149; Moore v. Battie, Ambler 371; Comyn on Usury 94, et seq.; Stuart v. Mechanics and Manufacturers Bank, 19 Johns.

Second National, C., Co. v. Borden

113 N.J. Eq. 378 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1933

Marshall's Executors v. Hadley, 50 N.J. Eq. 547 ; Peer v. Jenkins, 102 N.J. Eq. 235 ; Creveling's Executors v. Jones, 21 N.J. Law 573 . As was said by Mr. Justice Holmes in Eaton v. … Brown v. Mugway, 15 N.J. Law 330 ; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Clark, 96 N.J. Eq. 550 ; Swetland v. Swetland, 100 N.J. Eq. 196 .

Sayre v. Fredericks

16 N.J. Eq. 205 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1863

Martin v. Mowlin, 2 Burr. 969; Browne on Stat. of Frauds 65; 2 Story’s Eq. Jur., § 1016; 4 Kent’s Com. 159. … Eden, in his note to Fordyce v. Willis, 3 Brown’s Ch. R. 588, states that declarations of trust of personal property are in the same situation as all declarations of trust were before the statute.

New Order, C., Ass'n v. 222 Chancellor Ave.

106 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1930

Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co., 91 N.J. Eq. 86 ; Myers v. Brown, 92 N.J. Eq. 348 . … The only New Jersey case in which I have found the word has received a different construction is that of Carley v. Liberty Hat Manufacturing Co., 81 N.J.

Morris County Bank v. Rockaway Manufacturing Co.

14 N.J. Eq. 189 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

Wallace v. Melchior, 2 Browne 104; case of the Olympic Theatre, 2 Browne 275; Hinchman v. Graham, 2 Serg. & R. 170; Harker v. Conrad, 12 Serg. & R. 303; Church v. Allison, 10 Barr. 416; Witman v.