Case law

Williams v. Reilly

41 N.J. Eq. 137 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

The complainant claims that the defendant, in paying out, as treasurer, money illegally lent by the board of managers, was not protected by the action of the board in lending it or directing him to pay it; but that, on the … The case is therefore within the decision of Williams v. McKay, 13 Stew. Eq. 189. The demurrer will be overruled.

Harrison v. United N.J.R.R., C., Co.

101 N.J. Eq. 427 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 19, 1927

In Perth Amboy v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 98 N.J. … Hudson County v. Central Railroad Co., 68 N.J. Eq. 500 , and United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Co. v. Freeholders of Hudson, 89 N.J. Eq. 95 , relied upon by the complainant, are not in conflict.

Jersey Estates Corp. v. Weintraub

140 N.J. Eq. 216 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 13, 1947

Higginson v. Weld (Mass.), 14 Gray 165 . … Merlis v. G. M. Corp., 143 Atl. Rep. 139 ; Schultz *Page 218 v. Pollock, 102 N.J. Eq. 157 ; 104 N.J. Eq. 205 ; Strell v. Zisman, 136 Atl. Rep. 801 ; affirmed, 103 N.J. Eq. 25 . In Moran v. Borello, 4 N.J. Mis.

Blanchard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

78 N.J. Eq. 471 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 25, 1911

Howell, V. C. The bill in this case was originally filed by Leon E. … In Laurel Springs Land Co. v. Fougeray, 50 N. J.

Congregational Home Missionary Society v. Van Arsdale

58 N.J. Eq. 293 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 18, 1899

Emery, V. C. The testatrix, Mrs. Julia Van Arsdale Jones, bequeathed" $3,000 “to the Home Missionary Society of America.” … In April, 1872, the home missionary boards of the old and new school, which had been respectively incorporated under the name of “ The Trustees of the Board of Domestic Missions of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian

Macon Knitting Co. v. Leicester Mills Co.

65 N.J. Eq. 138 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 6, 1903

Brown, the treasurer of the Leicester Mills Compaq, wrote to Mr. … And in Mudgett v. Thomas, 55 Fed.

Moran v. Kelley

95 N.J. Eq. 380 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 26, 1924

Such a use, when possessing those elements of definifeness, is sustained, generally, by the American authorities (6 Cyc. 920), and a similar bequest was sustained by Vice-Chancellor Emery in this court in Kerrigan v. … Rep. 701 , which is cited with approval by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson in Brown v. Condit, 70 N. J. Eq. 440, and by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in While v. Newark, 103 Atl. Rep. 1043 . See, also, Kerrigan v. Connelly, 46 Atl.

Robbins v. Ideal Wheel & Tire Co.

93 N.J. Eq. 293 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 2, 1921

value of the patents if in the present litigation the rights of creditors were involved, as in Holcombe et al. v. … In dis-po-sing of. a. somewhat *296 similar question Vice-Chancellor Bergen, in Goodnow v. American Writing Paper Co., 72 N. J. Eq. 645, quoted the language of Judge Showalter in Northern Trust Co. v.

Phillips v. Reeder

18 N.J. Eq. 95 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1866

v. … W. 140; Hammond v. Douglas, 5 Ves. 539 ; Crawshay v. Collins, 15 Ves. 218; S. C., 1 Jac. & W. 267; S. C., 2 Russ. 325; Featherstonhaugh v. Fenwick, 17 Ves. 298; Brown v. De Tastet, Jacob 28 4; Wedderburn v.

Groel v. United Electric Co.

70 N.J. Eq. 616 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 2, 1905

Gaeeison, V. C. … judgment of the board, it is inexpedient to bring such a suit.

Duncan v. Hayes & Greenwood

22 N.J. Eq. 25 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1871

Shields v. Arndt, 3 Green’s Ch. 234; Holsman v. Bleaching Co., 1 McCarter 343; Ross v. Butler, supra. The opinion of the Court of Appeals in Carlisle v. Cooper, 6 C. E. Green 580; Crump v. Lambert, supra; Walter v. … In Ross v.

Hardenburgh v. Blair

30 N.J. Eq. 42 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

See Whitcomb v. Cardell, 42 Vt. 2A; Brown v. Williamson, 36 Pa. St. 338. Nickell v. Handly, 10 Gratt. 336 . … Thompson, 41 Me. 539 ; Bridgman v. McKissick, 15 Iowa 260 ; Lang v. Sopke, 5 Sand/. 363 ; Brown v. Harris, 25 Barb. 134 ; Brown v. Tucker, 47 Ga. 485 ; Matthews v. McPherson, 65 N. C. 189 ; Campbell v.

Hunt v. Field

9 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1852

In fact, he gets none at all, for he cannot, by virtue of his execution, levy upon or sell them. *39 in the case of Melville v. Brown, 1 Harr. … This point was discussed, and the case of Melville et al. v. Brown was relied upon. I am likewise informed that Chancellor Halsted sustained a like bill.

Four Corners Building & Loan Ass'n v. Schwarzwaelder

88 N.J. Eq. 212 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 10, 1917

Lane, V. C. … The board of directors shall meet regularly at four P.

Fredd v. Darnell

107 N.J. Eq. 249 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 14, 1930

Canfield v. Browning, 69 N.J. Law 553 . No other levy was made of that execution prior to its return day, and no valid levy of it could be made thereafter. Matthews v. Warne, 11 N.J. Law 295 , 350 ; Kemble v. … Law 526 , 530 ; Canfield v. Browning, supra (at p. 555 ); Olden v. Sassman, 72 N.J. Eq. 637 .

Robotham v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

64 N.J. Eq. 673 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 20, 1903

Stevenson, V. C. … App. 252, 257; Booth v. Robinson, 55 Md. 419 ; Davis v.

Hart v. Hart

57 N.J. Eq. 543 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 13, 1899

Duvale v. Duvale, 9 Dick. Ch. Rep. 581; S. C. on appeal, 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 375. The transfers of the real and personal property, therefore, were purely voluntary. … Brown; but as Mr. Brown is not a party, no such decree can be made. I will advise a decree, therefore, that in regard to those moneys, Levi E. Hart shall account or furnish adequate real estate mortgage security to Mrs.

Hill v. Shultz

40 N.J. Eq. 164 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1885

Prop. 637; Taylor on Land, and Tenant § 161; Ogden v. Jennings, 62 N. Y. 526 ; Doyle v. Lord, 64 N. Y. 432 ; Voorhees v. Burchard, 55 N. Y. 98 ; French v. Carhart, 1 N. Y. 96 . … On the side over the steps it was covered with boards, and on the other side with iron bars, between which were boards.

Van Houten v. Pine

38 N.J. Eq. 72 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

Van Houten v. Pine, 9 Stew. Eq. 133. … Van Houten v. Pine, 9 Stew. Eq. 133. It appears by the proof that the association has an invested fund of $25,000.

Auerbacher v. Wood

139 N.J. Eq. 599 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 30, 1947

Chicago Bar Association v. United Taxpayers Association (Ill.), 38 N.E. Rep. 2d 349; Lowell Bar Association v. Loeb (Mass.), 52 N.E. Rep. 2d 27; Fitchette v. Taylor (Minn.), 254 N.W. … Rep. 910 ; 94 A.L.R. 356 ; Dworken v. Apartment House Owners Association ( Ohio ), 176 N.E. Rep. 577 ; Childs v. Smeltzer (Pa.), 171 Atl. Rep. 883 ; Paul v. Stanley (Wash.), 12 Pac. Rep. 2d 401; Merrick v.