Case law

Posselt v. D'Espard

87 N.J. Eq. 574 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 21, 1917

I am going to decide the case of D’Espard v. Fritz Schulz Junior Co., on application for appointment of a receiver. … application has been made. *577 There is no doubt but that the company at this time has no proper board of directors.

Blauvelt v. Van Winkle

29 N.J. Eq. 111 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

Terhune v. *116 Colton, 2 Stock. 21 ; Schenck v. Arrowsmith, 1 Stock. 314 ; Swarthout v. Curtis, 5 N. Y. 301 . The will clearly provided for the payment of the legacy. … Brown took his conveyance before any release or mortgage was executed. He holds subject to the lien of the legacy.

Braelow v. Louis Schlesinger, Inc.

109 N.J. Eq. 472 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 13, 1932

It is conceded that the only purchaser that could be promptly secured was the board of education. Both brokers had some dealings with representatives of that board. … But in Steinberg v. Mindlin, 96 N.J.

Curtis & Hill Gravel & Sand Co. v. State Highway Commission

91 N.J. Eq. 421 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 23, 1920

Buchanan, V. C. … There is no actual nomination of public boards, commissions or even of counties.

Carlisle v. Cooper

19 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1868

In Pollard v. … . - Simon V.

McKenna v. Corcoran

70 N.J. Eq. 627 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 20, 1905

L. l903 p. 543 § 35; Brown v. White, 29 N. J. Law (5 Dutch.) 514 (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1861, reversing Supreme Court, 29 N. J. Law (5 Dutch. ) 307; Durand v. Trusdell, 44 N. J. … Law (15 Vr.) 597 (Supreme Court, 1882); Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Oxford Iron Co., 38 N. J. Eq. (11 Stew.) 151 (Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, 1884). In tl^e case of Brown v.

Stokes v. Knickerbocker Investment Co.

70 N.J. Eq. 518 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 10, 1905

Bergen, V. C. The complainant is one of the stockholders of the defendant Knickerbocker Investment Company, the other defendants being Manhattan Bond and Underwriters Company, Henry P. … Tiger and others, directors and officers of the company'-, obtained sufficient proxies from stockholders to increase the number of this board to fifteen, the purpose being to obtain a board of directors the majority of whom

Coley v. Coley

14 N.J. Eq. 350 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1862

He is presumed, therefore, to have remained as a child unemancipated in fact, in which case he is not entitled to recover wages for his services, nor is he liable for board. Ridgway v. English, 2 Zab. 409. … Boyd v. Dunlap, 1 Johns. Ch. R. 478; Wickes v. Clarke, 8 Paige 161 ; 1 Am. Lead. Cases 49.

Cutler v. Ricamio

16 N.J. Eq. 89 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1863

Johnson v. Mills, 1 Vesey, sen., 282; Hallet v. Thompson, 5 Paige 583 ; Craig v. Hone, 2 Edwards' Ch. R. 554; 1 Story’s Eq., § 603; 2 Ibid., § 826-7, 845-6, 851. … In Johnson v.

Mack Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens Construction Co.

85 N.J. Eq. 331 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 8, 1915

This has been held in the following cases in this court and in our Court of errors and appeals: Garretson v. Clark and Harris v. Garretson, 57 Atl. Rep. 414 ; Somers Brick Co. v. Souder, 70 N. J. … Eq. 759, 762; Cope v. Walton Company, 77 N. J. Eq. 512, 517; Board of Education v. Tait, 80 N. J. Eq. 94, 96; *334 Agnew Company v. Paterson Board of Education, 83 N. J. Eq. 49, 66; Same Case on appeal, Ibid. 336, 339.

Voorhees v. Nixon

72 N.J. Eq. 791 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 15, 1907

See Reed v. Aubrey, 91 Ga. 435 , and cases there collected. … Magie v. Reynolds, 51 N. J. Eq. (6 Dick.) 113, 117.

Works v. Selby

68 N.J. Eq. 271 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 19, 1904

If the board does not disaffirm, it will 1)8 presumed to ratify. Indianapolis Rolling Mill v. St. Louis Railroad Co., 120 U. S. 256 . But knowledge must precede acquiescence. … Thus Baron Parke, in Lyon v.

Soos v. Soos

14 N.J. Misc. 381 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 2, 1936

Such has been the established rule in actions for divorce from bed and board for extreme cruelty and in separate maintenance suits based upon extreme cruelty. Cook v. Cook, 11 N. J. Eq. 195, 201; Cavileer v. … In my judgment the character of the offense of extreme cruelty under the Blackwell act is the same as it is in the bed and board cases. See Sachse v. Sachse, 107 N. J. Eq. 41; 151 Atl. Rep. 744 ; Dinnebeil v.

Eckhause v. Berwyn Estates

104 N.J. Eq. 416 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 13, 1929

Mendel v. … "It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the party of the second part will apply to the zoning board or such other board having jurisdiction in the city of Newark, for permission to erect an apartment house

Vreeland v. O'Neil

36 N.J. Eq. 399 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1883

Paterson v. O’Neill, 5 Stew. Eq. 386. … While in Jersey City v.

Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp.

115 N.J. Eq. 28 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 4, 1933

Woodward v. Woodward, 9 N.J. Law [*] 115; Shinn v. Zimmerman, 23 N.J. Law 150 ; Lodor v. Baker, Arnold Co., 39 N.J. Law 49 . … Sparhawk v. Yerkes, 142 U.S. 1 ; 12 S.C. 104 ; Paige v. Edmunds, 187 U.S. 596 ; 23 S.C. 200 ; Board of Trade of Chicago v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 1 ; 44 S.C. 232 .

Page v. Asbury Methodist Episcopal Church

78 N.J. Eq. 114 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 2, 1910

Leaming, V. C. … This raises a prima facie presumption that the mortgage was *117 executed by authority of the board, and casts upon defendant the burden of establishing the contrary. Leggett v.

Neureiter Horre, Inc. v. Central R.R. Co.

124 N.J. Eq. 163 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 12, 1938

The power of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners to order the elimination of grade crossings by virtue of P.L. 1913 ch. 57 , as amended P.L. 1930 ch. 101 , is not, nor can it be questioned. Erie Railroad Co. v. … Swift v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 66 N.J. Eq. 34 ; affirmed, Ibid. 452.

Van Varick v. Van Varick, Inc.

118 N.J. Eq. 539 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 4, 1935

In July, 1931, defendant corporation entered into a contract with the board of education of the town of Bloomfield for the installation of certain plumbing work in a school in the town. … As was pointed out in the case of Board of Education, City of Linden , v. Vail, 108 N.J. Eq. 207 , the receiver took cum onere.

McCarter v. Dungan

74 N.J. Eq. 251 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 14, 1908

Leaming, V. C. Section 114 of the State Militia act of 1906 (P. … The affidavit of the adjutant-general, who is a member and recording officer of the state military board and armory board, discloses that on February 5th, 1907, a formal action was taken by the board touching the use of the