Case law

State v. Jennings

129 N.J. Eq. 51 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 6, 1941

In that cause, Board of Health of Pompton Lakes v. E.I. DuPont DeNemours Powder Co., 79 N.J. Eq. 31 ; 80 Atl. … The Vice-Chancellor pointed out that in Board of Health v. Summit, 56 Atl.

Easton & McMahon v. New York & Long Branch Railroad

26 N.J. Eq. 359 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1875

Bein v. Heath, 12 How. 168 ; Merryfield v. Jones, 2 Curtis C. C. R. 306. … Novello v. James, 31 Eng. L. & E. 280.

Newark Twenty-One, C., Assn. v. Zukerberg

115 N.J. Eq. 579 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 9, 1934

Latimer v. Equitable Loan and Investment Co., 81 Fed. Rep. 776; Towle v. American Building and Loan Association, 75 Fed. Rep. 938. … Thirteenth Ward Building and Loan Association of Newark v. Weissberg, 115 N.J. Eq. 487 .

Class v. Strack

85 N.J. Eq. 319 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 20, 1915

Reaming, V. C. … See, also, Brown v. Brown, 82 N. J. Eq. 40; Lloyd v. Conover, 25 N. J. Law 47, 52, in which case Chief-Justice Green characterizes the right of inchoate dower as “vested.” Vreeland v. Jacobus, 19 N. J.

Tolen v. Tolen

96 N.J. Eq. 496 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 30, 1924

Izard v. Bodine, 11 N.J. Eq. 403 ; Barrell v. Barrell, 25 N.J. Eq. 173 ; Edsall v. Merrill, 37 N.J. Eq. 114 ; Sailer v. Sailer, 41 N.J. Eq. 398 ; Lloyd v. Turner, 70 N.J. Eq. 425 . … For an analysis of the authorities on the subjects, see the footnotes to Gage v. Gage, 28 L.R.A. 829 ; Thurstin v. Brown, 29 L.R.A. ( N.S. ) 238. See, also, "Co-tenancy," 7 R.C.L. 826. Exception overruled. *Page 498

Siesel v. Mandeville

140 N.J. Eq. 490 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 14, 1947

See Young v. Young, 45 N.J. Eq. 27 , 34 ; 16 Atl. Rep. 921 ; McCormick v. Stephany, 57 N.J. Eq. 257 ; 41 Atl. Rep. 840 . … Cushing v. Blake, 30 N.J. Eq. 689 ; Martling v. Martling, 55 N.J. Eq. 771 , 781 ; 39 Atl. Rep. 203 ; Brown v. Brown, 82 N.J. Eq. 40 ; 88 Atl. Rep. 186 ; 26 Am. Jur. "Husband and Wife," § 76.

Curtis & Hill Gravel & Sand Co. v. State Highway Commission

91 N.J. Eq. 421 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 23, 1920

Buchanan, V. C. … There is no actual nomination of public boards, commissions or even of counties.

Mogelever v. Newark Newspaper Guild

122 N.J. Eq. 316 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 15, 1937

State v. Langhans, 95 N.J. Law 213 . For example, a defendant cannot complain because all women are excluded from the panel. State v. James, 96 N.J. Law 132 . … of the trial board.

Carlisle v. Cooper

19 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1868

In Pollard v. … . - Simon V.

Wilson v. Vogel

87 N.J. Eq. 584 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 19, 1917

Eq. 441; Cantine v. Brown, 46 N. J. Law 599, and Kent v. Armstrong, 6 N. J. … Thirty-five years later we again had before us, in the case of Ccmtine v. Brown, supra, the question of the construction of a devise similar to that under scrutiny in Kent v.

State v. Hutchinson

39 N.J. Eq. 218 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1884

Bird, V. C. … Hoagland v. Culvert, Spen. 387; State v. Perkins, 4 Zab. 409.

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McCarter

111 N.J. Eq. 315 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 19, 1932

Woolsey v. Woolsey, 78 N.J. Eq. 517 ; Shearman v. Cameron, 78 N.J. Eq. 532 . … Lang v. Lang's Ex'rs, supra; Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J. Eq. 667 ; Beattie v. Gedney, 99 N.J. Eq. 207 ; Hagedorn v. Arens, 106 N.J. Eq. 377 . Complainant may take a decree pursuant to the views above expressed.

Oram v. Oram

99 N.J. Eq. 65 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 11, 1926

The complainant claims an inchoate right of dower in the proceeds and in the lands unsold, and prays that it be impressed on both, and she rests her right to relief on Brown v. Brown, 82 N.J. Eq. 40 . … Meeker v. Forbes, 84 N.J. Eq. 271 .

Appleton v. Worne Plastics Corp.

140 N.J. Eq. 324 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 29, 1947

In Mayer v. … There was here involved an original failure to elect a board of directors. In Edison v. Edison United Phonograph Co., 52 N.J. Eq. 620 ; 29 Atl.

Wadsworth v. Baldwin

79 N.J. Eq. 274 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 3, 1912

I have referred to the authorities settling the general rule in New Jersey, in Kidder's Executors v. Kidder (1903), 56 Atl. Rep. 154 . … Gilmer v. Stone, 120 U. S. 586 .

Fleming v. Moving Picture Machine Operators

16 N.J. Misc. 502 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1938

Berry, V. C. This suit is an aftermath of the decision of this court in the consolidated cases of Collins v. International Alliance, &c., and Maglio v. … Oppenheimer, who wrote the minutes of the executive board meeting of December 14th, 1936 (these min *506 utes being written np while the board was in session and as the different matters were taken up and disposed of) says

Riddle v. Mary A. Riddle Co.

140 N.J. Eq. 315 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 28, 1947

See, also, Merriman v. National Zinc Corp., 82 N.J. Eq. 493 ; 89 Atl. Rep. 764 ; Farmers Loan and Trust Co. v. Hewitt, 94 N.J. Eq. 65 ; 118 Atl. Rep. 267 ; Kelly v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., 106 N.J. … Roberts v. Scull, 58 N.J. Eq. ( 13 Dick. ) 396." In Elevator Supplies Co. v. Wylde, 106 N.J. Eq. 163 ; 150 Atl.

Voorhees v. Nixon

72 N.J. Eq. 791 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 15, 1907

See Reed v. Aubrey, 91 Ga. 435 , and cases there collected. … Magie v. Reynolds, 51 N. J. Eq. (6 Dick.) 113, 117.

Hand v. Startup

38 N.J. Eq. 115 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

O'Neill v. Dringer, 4 Stew. Eq. 507; Howell v. Essex Co. Road Board, 5 Stew. Eq. 672. … The act provides that the proceedings of the board shall be filed and recorded in the office of the clerk of the city, and that when so filed, the assessments made by the board, or a majority thereof, shall be a lien upon

Dixon v. Ober

141 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 19, 1948

to the applicable regulations and provisions of the Board. … Lounsbery v. Locander, supra; Borden v. Curtis, 48 N.J. Eq. 120 ; 21 Atl. Rep. 472 ; White v. Weaver, 68 N.J. Eq. 644 ; 61 Atl. Rep. 25 ; Triplett v. Ivins, 93 N.J. Eq. 202 ; 112 Atl. Rep. 509 ; Levine v.