Case law

Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Simandl

124 N.J. Eq. 207 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 8, 1938

Ocean City Association v. Schurch, 57 N.J. Eq. 268 , 271 ; Gilbough v. West Side Amusement Co., 64 N.J. Eq. 27 , 36 ; McMillan v. Kuehnle, 76 N.J. Eq. 256 , 263 (approved on this point on appeal, 78 N.J. … to conform to the grade fixed by the board was sustained in Erie Railroad Co. v.

Strell v. Zisman

5 N.J. Misc. 427 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 11, 1927

Backes, V. C. This bill is filed by a vendor to compel his vendee to perform his contract to purchase premises in Centre street, Newark. … Gerba v. Mitruske, 84 N. J. Eq. 141. Decree for complainant.

Audenried v. East Coast Milling Co.

68 N.J. Eq. 450 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 7, 1904

Bergen, V. C. … Rep. 531; Powell v. Railroad Company, 38 Fed. Rep. 187; Glen v.

Executors of Burnet v. Burnet

30 N.J. Eq. 595 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1879

Warrington, 2 Hare 54 ; Peacock v. Stockford, 3 DeG. M. & G. 73 ; McMaster v. McMaster, 10 Grait. 275; Brown v. Ramsey, 1 Gill 347 ; 'Farmers. Kimball, 46 N. H. 435 ; Fissel's Appeal, 27 Pa. … Smith v. Curtis, 5 Dutch. 345; Fisher v. Skillman, 3 C. E. Gr. 229; Pitney v. Brown, supra; Blackler v. Webb, 2 P. Wms. 383; 2 Jarman 111, marg.; Hawk. on Wills 113.

von Bernuth v. von Bernuth

76 N.J. Eq. 177 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 17, 1909

The adjudication in the Tew Jersey suit must be made on these pleadings, and while the decree will settle the rights of the parties as of its date (Peck v. Goodberlett, 109 N. Y. 180 ; Randel v. Brown, 2 How. (U. … In Dehon v.

Scott v. P. Lorillard Co.

108 N.J. Eq. 153 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 14, 1931

Colgate v. U.S. Leather Co., 75 N.J. Eq. 229 . … resolution, as said board may determine."

Hemingway v. Ball

118 N.J. Eq. 378 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 27, 1935

The agreement in question is of the kind the law abhors and merits the condemnation visited by Chief-Justice Beasley upon the agreement which was involved in Noice v. Brown, 38 N.J. Law 228 . … Noice v. Brown, supra. A contract is void if when made it is contrary to morality or public policy. When the illegality of a contract is made to appear, the law will not extend its aid to either of the parties.

Hamilton v. United Laundries Corp.

111 N.J. Eq. 78 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 1, 1932

Jackson v. Hooper, 76 N.J. Eq. 592 . In Gregory v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, 40 N.J. … Ellerman v. Chicago Junction Railways, c., Co., 49 N.J. Eq. 217 ; Elevator Supplies Co. v. Wylde, supra; Kelly v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., 106 N.J. Eq. 545 , 554 .

Coddington v. Coddington

20 N.J. Eq. 263 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1869

To give jurisdiction over the subject matter, the complainant must have actually *265 changed his residence or domicil in the sense in which the Supreme Court in the case of Cadwalader v. … This construction was given to this act in Yates v. Yates, 2 Beas. 280, and in Brown v. Brown, 1 McCarter 78.

Wright v. First National Bank

52 N.J. Eq. 392 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1894

Justice Depue, in the case of Hackensack Water Co. v. De Kay, 9 Stew. … In the case of Beatty v. The Marine Ins.

Lyndhurst v. United Cork Cos.

116 N.J. Eq. 4 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 26, 1934

Board of Health of the Township of North Brunswick v. Lederer, 32 N.J. … Board of Health of Irvington v. Schmidt, supra; Damadio v. Levinsohn, 111 N.J. Eq. 84 . In construing this statute, the late Vice-Chancellor Bird, in State, ex rel. Board of Health of Hamilton Township v. Neidt, 19 Atl.

Gerard v. Birch

28 N.J. Eq. 317 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1877

The cause in this respect is Avithin the decision in Raymond v. Post, 10 C. E. Gr. 447, and Birch and Bender aaúII be perpetually enjoined accordingly. … Brown, should be grounds for his magnificent mansion.

John W. Barwell. Inc. v. Vail

108 N.J. Eq. 117 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 25, 1931

Board of Education of Elizabeth v. Zinc, 101 N.J. Eq. 78 . … The surety company contends that its situation in the instant case is the same as that of the indemnity company in Board of Education v.

McCullough's Executors v. McCullough

44 N.J. Eq. 313 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Stuart, 3 Beav. 430; Miles’s Will, 27 Beau. 579; Simeon’s Trusts, 1 Johns. & Hem. 89; Bethell v. Abraham, L. R. (17 Eq.) 24; Rush’s Estate, 12 Pa. St. 375, 378, Gibson, C. J.; but see Brown v. Brown, L. R. (29 Ch. … Div.) 889; Gray v. Lynch, 8 Gill 403 ; Amory v. Green, 13 Allen 413 ; Brown v. French, 125 Mass. 410 ; Hogan v. De Peyster, 20 Barb. 100 ; Coltrane v. Worrell, 30 Gratt. 434 ; Lamar v. Micou, 112 U. S. 452 .

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. McFarlan

30 N.J. Eq. 180 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

Andrews v. Farnham, 2 Stock. 91 ; Parsons v. Heston, 3 Stock. 155 ; Howell v. Sebring, 1 McCart. 84, 90; Marsh v. Mitchell, 11 C. E. Gr. 497, 499; Wilson v. Cobb, 1 Stew. 177 . This action was commenced July 29th, 1875. … The supreme court of Massachusetts, in Powell v.

Brooks-Wright, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

133 N.J. Eq. 15 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 29, 1943

Green v. Morris and Essex Railroad Co., 12 N.J. Eq. 165 ; affirmed, 15 N.J. Eq. 469 ; Seymour v. Goodwin, 68 N.J. Eq. 189 ; Hackettstown National Bank v. Louise Ming, 52 N.J. Eq. 56 . In Twaits v. … O'Donnell v. McCann, 77 N.J. Eq. 188 ; Kempson v. Kempson, 61 N.J. Eq. 303 .

Lipman v. Forman

138 N.J. Eq. 556 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 21, 1946

It has been said that the practice of dentistry is a privilege subject to state regulation in the interest of the public ( Levine v. State Board, c., of Dentistry, 121 N.J. Law 193 ). … Mosig v. Jersey Chiropodists, Inc., 122 N.J. Eq. 382 ; New Hampshire Board of Registration, c., v. Scott Jewelry Co., 9 Atl. Rep. 2d 513. Defendant's motion will be granted. *Page 559

Vreeland v. Vreeland

53 N.J. Eq. 387 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1895

Gr. 529; Brewer v. Wilson, *390 2 C. E. Gr. 180; Eyre v. Eyre, 4 C. E. Gr. 102; Brown v. Brown, 6 Stew. Eq. 657; Larison v. Polhemus,9 Stew. Eq. 506; Schutt v. Missionary Society &c., 14 Stew. Eq. 115; Pflugar v. … Cooper v. Carlisle and Brown v. Brown, supra.

Paterson General Hospital Ass'n v. Blauvelt

72 N.J. Eq. 725 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 6, 1907

In the case at bar there is nothing in the will to take it out of the plain rule laid down in Corwine v. Corwine, supra, and so frequently applied since that time. Brown v. Brown, 31 N. J. … In Greville v. Browne, supra, one of the authorities cited by the vice-chancellor, and which I have heretofore alluded to, Lord Cranworth, in commenting upon an argument and an inference from the case of Awbrey v.

Easton & McMahon v. New York & Long Branch Railroad

26 N.J. Eq. 359 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1875

Bein v. Heath, 12 How. 168 ; Merryfield v. Jones, 2 Curtis C. C. R. 306. … Novello v. James, 31 Eng. L. & E. 280.