Case law

Benton Holden v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.

122 N.J. Eq. 309 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 14, 1937

Trotter v. Heckscher, 40 N.J. Eq. 612 ; Alpaugh v. Wood, 45 N.J. Eq. 153 ; Norton v. Sinkhorn, 63 N.J. Eq. 313 . … Martin Co. v. L. Martin Wilckes Co., 75 N.J.

Patco Products Co., Inc. v. Wilson

140 N.J. Eq. 91 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1947

See Staley v. South Jersey Realty Co., 83 N.J. Eq. 300 ; In re Merrill, 88 N.J. Eq. 261 , 267 ; Brown v. Brown, 96 N.J. Eq. 428 , 430 ; Passaic-Athenia Bus Co., Inc., v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc., 100 N.J. … Eq. 42 ; Laurie v. Ryan, 130 N.J. Eq. 248 , 251 ; First Corporation, c., v. Washington Pharmacy, Inc., 132 N.J. Eq. 490 , 491 .

Stout v. Sutphen

132 N.J. Eq. 583 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1943

Agnew Co. v. Paterson Board of Education, 83 N.J. Eq. 49 , 67 ; 89 Atl. Rep. 1046 ; affirmed, Id., 336, 339; 90 Atl. Rep. 1135 ; Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearing Co., 90 N.J. Eq. 515 ; 107 Atl. … Rep. 425 ; Brown v. Home Development Co., 129 N.J. Eq. 172 ; 18 Atl. Rep. 2d 742. The accrued interest from the date of withdrawal was allowed in Reeves v. Reeves, 102 N.J. Eq. 436 ; 141 Atl. Rep. 175 .

Leggett v. New-Jersey Manufacturing & Banking Co.

1 N.J. Eq. 541 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 15, 1832

S. v. Dandridge, 12 Wheat. 64 ; Essex Turnpike Corp. v. Collins, 8 Mass. Rep. 299 ; Angell and Ames on Corp. 170. … Patterson, 7 Crunch, 306; Randall v. Van Veghten and al. 19 John. 65 ; Bank of Alexandria v. Seton, 1 Pet. 299 .

In Re Hayden

101 N.J. Eq. 361 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1927

In Brown v. Brown, 96 N.J. … In West v. State, 22 N.J.

Johnson v. Fred L. Emmons, Inc.

115 N.J. Eq. 335 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 16, 1934

It may be conceded that the lien claim attached to this sum — this retained fifteen per cent. — indeed it is so held in Pierson v. Haddonfield, 66 N.J. Eq. 180 ; 57 Atl. … The determination in Pierson v. Haddonfield, supra , does not hold otherwise; neither do any of the New York cases (our statute being taken from the New York statute) cited by the lien claimants.

Brands v. Cassedy

124 N.J. Eq. 417 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 11, 1938

Brown v. Brown, 33 N.J. Eq. 650 . Complainant contends the case of Spinning v. Spinning, 43 N.J. Eq. 215 , holds that a widow's quarantine is not a freehold estate in land. This contention is erroneous. … Eq. 300 , 305 , and also in the case of Douma v. Powers, 92 N.J. Eq. 25 .

Nilkin v. Silverman

95 N.J. Eq. 396 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 20, 1924

In Demott v. Stockton Paper Ware Manufacturing Co., 32 N. J. … Meyers v. Campbell, 59 N. J. Law 378; Johnson v. Martin, L. R. A. 1916 c. 1057. The complainant is entitled to a decree.

De Gray v. Monmouth Beach Club House Co.

50 N.J. Eq. 329 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1892

Brown, sheriff, to Blagden, and that from Blagden to complainant, contained the covenant. October 25th, 1876, Daniel Dodd and Anthony Q,. … But if the objection was valid it would apply as well to the use of a house erected on a lot as a boarding-house.

Weil v. Ricord

24 N.J. Eq. 169 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1873

Rex. v. Croke, Cowp. 26 Warne v. Varley, 6 T. R. 413; Dwarris on Statutes 750; Kennedy v. Phelps, 10 Louisiana Ann. Rep. 227. This last case was very similar in its features to the one now before the court. … Belcher v. Farrar, 8 Allen 325 ; City of Salem v. Eastern R. R. Co., 98 Mass. 431 . In Belcher v.

Smith's v. First Presbyterian Church

26 N.J. Eq. 132 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1875

In Hill v. … In Flint v.

Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

138 N.J. Eq. 312 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 31, 1946

In Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 74 N.J. Law 583 ; 65 Atl. … Smith v. Clay , reported in a note to Deloraine v. Brown, 3 Bro. C.C. 639 ( Amb. 645 ).

Martin v. Kimball

86 N.J. Eq. 10 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 2, 1916

The cases of Edwards v. Edwards and Lawrence v. … Brown to keep1 up the style of living to which she has been accustomed.

Lillard v. Oil, Paint & Drug Co.

70 N.J. Eq. 197 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 31, 1903

In Davis v. Thomas & Davis Co., 63 N. J. … In Hayes, Receiver, v.

Hofman v. Hofman

108 N.J. Eq. 161 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 15, 1931

Kyle v. Kyle, 52 N.J. Eq. 710 (at p. 712 ); Lake v. Lake, 80 N.J. Eq. 350 ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 100 N.J. Eq. 482 ; Reibesehl v. Reibesehl, 106 N.J. Eq. 32 . … See, also, Reibesehl v. Reibesehl, supra (at p. 37 ).

Kuskin v. Guttman

98 N.J. Eq. 617 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1925

Brown, 1 McCart. 19; 2 McCart. 498; Wharton v. Stoutenberg, 35 N.J. Eq. 266 ; Donnelly v. Currie Hardware Co., 66 N.J. Law 388 ; Jersey City v. Brown, 32 N.J. Law 504 ; Trenton and Mercer County Traction Corporation v. … Law 719 ; Mente Co. v. Heller, 123 Atl. Rep. 755 ; Domestic Telegraph Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone Co., 39 N.J. Eq. 160 ; Potter v. Hollister, 45 N.J. Eq. 508 .

State Bd. Milk Control v. Richman, C., Co.

117 N.J. Eq. 296 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 14, 1934

The court of errors and appeals sustained the exclusion of the evidence and said: "It has stood unquestioned in this state for a quarter of a century, and in Board of Freeholders of Passaic v. … Pangborn v. Young, 32 N.J.

Moore v. Galupo

65 N.J. Eq. 194 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 18, 1903

In Brown v. Brown, 6 Stew. Eq. 651, the court of appeals declared that specific performance would not be decreed unless the existence and terms of the contract be clearly proved. … He differentiated this case from the preceding cases of McKibbin v. Brown, Potts v. Whitehead and Nichols v.

Harris v. Harris

97 N.J. Eq. 190 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 27, 1924

Arnold and Margaret Brown, have demanded of the executor all the securities which belonged to the wife, Dr. Ellen B. … Inhabitants of Phillipsburg v. Bruch, Executor, 37 N.J. Eq. 482 . There is nothing on the face of the will to manifest such contrary intention.

Masso v. Burke

138 N.J. Eq. 276 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 18, 1946

No jurisdiction existed in any court to enforce an order of the National War Labor Board. … But as we pointed out in that case the War Labor Disputes Act does not make the Board's orders enforceable or reviewable." National War Labor Board v. Montgomery Ward Co., 144 Fed.