Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.32s

  • Driver v. Smith

    89 N.J. Eq. 339 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 24, 1918

    Taylor Iron and Steel Co. v. Nichols, supra. In Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. … Lumley v. Gye, 2 E. & B. 216; Quinn v. Leathem, supra; Notice v. Brown, supra; Frank & Dugan v. Herold, 63 N. J. Eq. 443; Jonas Glass Co. v. Glass Bottle Blowers’ Association, supra; Hinchman Coal and Iron Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Board of Domestic Missions of the German Reformed Church in America v. Von Puechelstein

    27 N.J. Eq. 30 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1876

    Bomberger, of Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania, president of the Board of Domestic Missions of the German Reformed Church in America. … Bennington Iron Co. v. Rutherford, 3 Harr. 158 ; Star Brick Co. v. Ridsdale, 7 Vroom 229 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grover v. Bd. of Ed., Franklin Twp.

    102 N.J. Eq. 415 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 19, 1928

    Terhune v. Colton, 12 N.J. Eq. 232 (at p. 238 ); Ibid. 312 (at p. 320 ). … Terhune v. Colton, supra (at p. 237 ).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • See v. Heppenheimer

    69 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 3, 1905

    Justice Brown in Handley v. Stutz, 139 U. S. 417, at p. 426 ). … Justice Brown, in speaking for the supreme court of the United States, in Dickerman v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Pohlman v. Pohlman

    60 N.J. Eq. 28 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 22, 1900

    to board there ever since, but still carries on his business in the city of New York. … For the reasons stated in McGean v. McGean, 46 Atl. Rep. 656 , and Tracy v. Tracy, 15 Dick. Ch.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Supreme Fuel v. Peerless Plush

    117 N.J. Eq. 259 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 5, 1934

    Lockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board and Paper Co., 74 N.J. Eq. 686 ; Raht v. Attrill, 106 N.Y. 423 ; 13 N.E. Rep. 282 ; Brown v. Wintterbottom , *Page 261 98 Ohio St. 127 ; 120 N.E. … Lockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board and Paper Co., supra; Raht v. Attrill , *Page 263 supra; Hooper v. Central Trust Co., supra; International Trust Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kienzlan v. Bd. of Ed., Keansburg

    100 N.J. Eq. 511 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 19, 1927

    But it is now urged on behalf of the complainants that Mack Manufacturing Co. v. … Schneider v. Schmidt, 82 N.J. Eq. 81 ; Agnew v. Paterson Board of Education, 83 N.J. Eq. 49 ; affirmed, Ibid. 336.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Home Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America v. Davis

    70 N.J. Eq. 577 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 14, 1905

    Schenck v. Conover, 13 N. J. Eq. (2 Beas.) 220; Thomas v. De Baum, 14 N. J. Eq. (1 McCart.) 37, 41; Barton v. Beatty, 28 N. J. Eq. (1 Stew.) 412. … In support of this contention the petitioner’s counsel relies upon Chadwick v. Island Beach Co., 43 N. J. Eq. (16 Stew.) 616, but clearly that ease does not afford the petitioner any effective support.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bank of Harlem v. City of Bayonne

    48 N.J. Eq. 246 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

    Field v. Mayor, 6 N. Y. 179 ; S. C., 57 Am. *253 Dec. 435 and notes; Hall v. City of Buffalo, 1 Keyes 199 ; Brill v. Tuttle, 81 N. Y. 454, 457 ; Brown v. Dunn, 21 Vr. 111 , 113; 2 Spenc. Eq. Jur. § 852; 3 Pom. Eq. … authorized' except in pursuance of an order of said board, passed at a stated meeting and entered on the minutes.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sheehan v. Humphreys

    81 N.J. Eq. 416 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 3, 1912

    Howell, V. O. … McKibbin v. Brown, 14 N. J. Eq. (1 McCart.) 13; affirmed, 15 N. J. Eq. (2 McCart.) 498; Potter v. Hollister, 45 N. J. Eq. (18 Stew.) 508; affirmed, 46 N. J. Eq. (1 Dick.) 609; Myers v. Metzger, 63 N. J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.

    91 N.J. Eq. 216 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 28, 1919

    The realty company decided to sell, and to that end its board of directors formally resolved “that Jefferson Building be placed on the market' for $32,000.” … Some of the cases in this state are: McKibbin v. Brown, 14 N. J. Eq. 13; Welsh v. Bayaud, 21 N. J. Eq. 186; Domestic Telegraph Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone Co., 39 N. J. Eq. 160; Woodruff v. Woodruff, 44 N. J.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Conway v. Third Nat. Bank, C., Camden

    118 N.J. Eq. 61 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 21, 1935

    Kitchen v. Pitney, 94 N.J. Eq. 485 ; Patton v. Pierce, 114 N.J. Eq. 548 . … In the case of Nichols v. The Newark Hospital, 71 N.J.

    Modified by Conway v. Third National Bank, C., Camden, 119 N.J. Eq. 575 (1936)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • White v. Risdon

    140 N.J. Eq. 613 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1947

    Eq. 246 ; Brown v. Brown, 33 N.J. Eq. 650 ; Pflugar v. Pultz, 43 N.J. Eq. 440 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 123 ; Young v. Young, 45 N.J. Eq. 27 ; 16 Atl. Rep. 921 ; Vreeland v. Vreeland, 53 N.J. Eq. 387 ; 32 Atl. Rep. 3 ; McTague v. … into and take possession of said land, dwelling house and premises of the defendant hereinbefore described; that complainants would thereafter and during and throughout the residue of *Page 616 the lifetime of defendant, board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Grimminger v. Alderton

    85 N.J. Eq. 425 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 21, 1915

    Highberger v. Stiffler, 21 Md. 338 . … Battlar v. Rosenblath, 42 N. J. Eq. 651, 657.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearing Co.

    90 N.J. Eq. 515 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 29, 1919

    Brown v. Barkham (1720), 1 P. Wms. 653; 24 Eng. Reprint 555; Perkyns v. Baynton (1784), 1 Bro. *517 C. C. 574; 28 Eng. Reprint 1305. … Interest on the decree being allowed as matter of damages, the language of Vice-Chancellor Stevénson, in Agnew v. Board of Education, 83 N. J.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Corsi v. State Bd. of Children's Guardians

    96 N.J. Eq. 254 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 16, 1924

    In the leading case of Richards v. Collins, 45 N.J. … Justice Minturn, in Fischer v. Meader, 95 N.J. Law 59 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Prudential Insurance Co.

    132 N.J. Eq. 170 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 29, 1942

    Quigley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 80 N.J. Law 486 ; 79 Atl. Rep. 458 ; Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 75 N.J. Law 771 ; 69 Atl. Rep. 239 . … Rep. 67 ; Brown v. Town of Union, 62 N.J. Law 142 ; 40 Atl. Rep. 632 ; affirmed, 65 N.J. Law 601 ; 48 Atl. Rep. 562 ; Van Riper v. Parsons, supra; Doherty v. Spitznagle, 104 N.J. Law 38 ; 139 Atl. Rep. 424 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brower v. Bd. of Commrs., Asbury Park

    103 N.J. Eq. 176 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 29, 1928

    Levy v. Blackmore, 67 Atl. Rep. 1022 ; Commercial Trust Co. v. Wertheim Coal Co., 88 N.J. Eq. 143 . … . § 666; Lincoln Furniture Co. v. Bornstein, 100 N.J. Eq. 78 ; Pom. Eq. Jur. § 454.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Magna Mfg. v. Aetna Cas.

    129 N.J. Eq. 142 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 6, 1941

    Brown v. Brown, 33 N.J. Eq. 650 . Where performance of a contract in specie will alone answer the ends of justice, this court will decree specific performance. Shimer v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 27 N.J. … Le Branthwait v. Halsey, 9 N.J. Law 3 ; John Agnew Co. v. Board of Education, 83 N.J. Eq. 49 ; Id. 336; Hosack v. Rogers, 9 Paige (N.Y.) 461; Doughty v. Doughty, 10 N.J. Eq. 347 ; Lamb v. Ryan, 40 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jaques v. Hunt

    10 N.J. Misc. 687 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 9, 1932

    She kept house for them, *690 they paying her $5 apiece board, later $6, and then $8. Fred’s claim that Mrs. … Neubeck v. Neubeck, 94 N. J. Eq. 167; 119 Atl. Rep. 26 . It is also claimed that Mrs. Jaques committed perjury in the pending litigation and relief should be denied on the authority of Clickner v. Clickner, 95 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.