Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
0.52s
99 N.J. Eq. 75 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 19, 1926
Vreeland v. Vreeland, 53 N.J. Eq. 387 ; Cooper v. Colson, 66 N.J. Eq. 328 ; Midmer v. Midmer Executors, 26 N.J. Eq. 299 ; Cutler v. Tuttle, 19 N.J. Eq. 549 . … Cooper v. Colson, supra. The other alleged consideration, that the complainants would refrain from engaging in a competing business with Brown in Lakewood, is fanciful.
Cited 1 timesPublished3 N.J. Misc. 572 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 20, 1925
Richards v. Collins, 45 N. J. Eq. 283; Warnecke v. Lane, 75 Atl. Rep. 233 ; In re Kirschner, 111 Atl. Rep. 737 ; Ziezel v. Hutchinson, 91 N. J. Eq. 325; In re Judge, 91 N. J. Eq. 395. … Richards v. Collins, supra; In re Kirschner, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished76 N.J. Eq. 126 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 21, 1909
Smith's Administrator v. Wood, 42 N. J. Eq. (15 Stew.) 563, 566. … Moffett to Eoberta Brown, Alfred S. Brown owed defendant Charles G. Brown certain money and paid the money so owing to Mary A.
Cited 3 timesPublished122 N.J. Eq. 563 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 20, 1937
Brown held the mortgage primarily for his own benefit, but secondarily for the benefit of complainant. Had Brown resorted to court to foreclose his mortgage, complainant would have been a necessary party. Chapman v. … Bird v. Davis, 14 N.J. Eq. 467 . When a chattel mortgage is void as to creditors, the mortgagee who *Page 566 sells, is liable to the creditors for the value of the chattels. Arnesto Paint Co. v. Brush, 117 N.J.
Cited 2 timesPublished137 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1946
Brown, died on July 24th, 1942. … In Blaine v. Krysowaty, 135 N.J. Eq. 355 ; 38 Atl.
Cited 4 timesPublished86 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 31, 1916
The complainants are Horace Brown, an infant of the age of seventeen years, and John Brown, an infant of the age of eleven years. The bill was preferred and filed by Della C. Dare, as their next friend. … Thompson v. Hart, 58 N. Y. App. Div. 439; affirmed, Same Case, 169 N. Y. 571 . "We are not without adjudication on this question in our own state. In Tomkins v. Miller, 27 Atl.
Cited 1 timesPublished118 N.J. Eq. 114 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 21, 1935
Brown, claiming to be the nearest kin and heir-at-law of Frank Elkinton, and seeking to have declared void the third and fifth paragraphs of his will. … Yawger's Executor v. Yawger, 37 N.J. Eq. 216 ; Carter v. Gray, 58 N.J. Eq. 411 ; Bruce v. Bruce, 90 N.J. Eq. 573 ; reversing, Ibid. 118.
Cited 4 timesPublished142 N.J. Eq. 169 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 9, 1948
See Passman v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 273 , 276 ; Frelinghuysen v. Frelinghuysen, 80 N.J. Eq. 482 , 485 ; Moore v. Moore, 84 N.J. Eq. 39 , 42 ; affirmed, 85 N.J. Eq. 150 . … In Davis v. Scharf, 99 N.J.
Cited 3 timesPublished126 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 28, 1939
Brown recovered against it. Cf. Corson v. Bailey, 98 N.J. Eq. 323 . Nor does the alleged insolvency of Mr. Brown alter this disposition of the matter. Trotter v. Heckscher, 40 N.J. … Tate v. Security Trust Co., 63 N.J. Eq. 559 ; Sipley v. Wass, 49 N.J. Eq. 463 ; George F. Perry Sons, Inc., v. Mand, 110 N.J. Eq. 111 .
Cited 2 timesPublished74 N.J. Eq. 620 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 9, 1908
Leaming, V. C.
Cited 1 timesPublished87 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1917
Lu tjen v. Lutjen, 64 N. J. … In Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Co., 94 U.
Cited 2 timesPublished10 N.J. Eq. 308 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1855
Brown advanced his money? These circumstances are explained by showing that Mr. … Brown did not purchase as the mere agent of the complainant.
Cited 2 timesPublished54 N.J. Eq. 594 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1896
Palmer, 42 Conn. 60 ; Drake v. Stone, 58 Ala. 136 ; Harley v. Heist, 86 Ind. 197 ), and it refuses, on the other hand, to hold, as the supreme court of Wisconsin, in Foster v. … And see Campbell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co., 98 Mass. 381, 400 .
Cited 1 timesPublished38 N.J. Eq. 186 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884
Van Fleet, V. C. The principal object of the suit in this case is to procure a partition to be made of a part of the lands of which Francis Asbury Farley died seized.
Cited 0 timesPublished27 N.J. Eq. 429 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1876
He charged her nothing, however, for her board. She lived in his family as a member of it.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 N.J. Eq. 657 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1852
In this state of things, an account is made out by A. against the Company, and B. assents to it; there being no action of the Board assenting to it. … Brown & Co., and accepted by D. S. Brown & Co. Prima facie the acceptance shows that the New England Manufacturing Co. had funds in the hands of Brown & Co. to the amount of the drafts.
Cited 0 timesPublished9 N.J. Eq. 297 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1853
Brown has this day assigned and set over to the said John R. … Brown from the payment of any of the debts and liabilities of said firm, then this obligation to be void; otherwise, to remain in force and effect.”
Cited 0 timesPublished33 N.J. Eq. 469 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881
Brown, for land in the city of Plainfield. … He says he saw Thorn on the subject, and, in view of the assumption, the latter consented to convey his interest to Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna