Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.52s

  • Havens v. Brown

    99 N.J. Eq. 75 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 19, 1926

    Vreeland v. Vreeland, 53 N.J. Eq. 387 ; Cooper v. Colson, 66 N.J. Eq. 328 ; Midmer v. Midmer Executors, 26 N.J. Eq. 299 ; Cutler v. Tuttle, 19 N.J. Eq. 549 . … Cooper v. Colson, supra. The other alleged consideration, that the complainants would refrain from engaging in a competing business with Brown in Lakewood, is fanciful.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pope v. Brown

    3 N.J. Misc. 572 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 20, 1925

    Richards v. Collins, 45 N. J. Eq. 283; Warnecke v. Lane, 75 Atl. Rep. 233 ; In re Kirschner, 111 Atl. Rep. 737 ; Ziezel v. Hutchinson, 91 N. J. Eq. 325; In re Judge, 91 N. J. Eq. 395. … Richards v. Collins, supra; In re Kirschner, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ely

    92 N.J. Eq. 487 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 6, 1921

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hageman v. Brown

    76 N.J. Eq. 126 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 21, 1909

    Smith's Administrator v. Wood, 42 N. J. Eq. (15 Stew.) 563, 566. … Moffett to Eoberta Brown, Alfred S. Brown owed defendant Charles G. Brown certain money and paid the money so owing to Mary A.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Abrams v. Brown

    122 N.J. Eq. 563 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 20, 1937

    Brown held the mortgage primarily for his own benefit, but secondarily for the benefit of complainant. Had Brown resorted to court to foreclose his mortgage, complainant would have been a necessary party. Chapman v. … Bird v. Davis, 14 N.J. Eq. 467 . When a chattel mortgage is void as to creditors, the mortgagee who *Page 566 sells, is liable to the creditors for the value of the chattels. Arnesto Paint Co. v. Brush, 117 N.J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rowland

    137 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1946

    Brown, died on July 24th, 1942. … In Blaine v. Krysowaty, 135 N.J. Eq. 355 ; 38 Atl.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Garton

    86 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 31, 1916

    The complainants are Horace Brown, an infant of the age of seventeen years, and John Brown, an infant of the age of eleven years. The bill was preferred and filed by Della C. Dare, as their next friend. … Thompson v. Hart, 58 N. Y. App. Div. 439; affirmed, Same Case, 169 N. Y. 571 . "We are not without adjudication on this question in our own state. In Tomkins v. Miller, 27 Atl.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Coxson

    118 N.J. Eq. 114 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 21, 1935

    Brown, claiming to be the nearest kin and heir-at-law of Frank Elkinton, and seeking to have declared void the third and fifth paragraphs of his will. … Yawger's Executor v. Yawger, 37 N.J. Eq. 216 ; Carter v. Gray, 58 N.J. Eq. 411 ; Bruce v. Bruce, 90 N.J. Eq. 573 ; reversing, Ibid. 118.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Robbins

    142 N.J. Eq. 169 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 9, 1948

    See Passman v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 273 , 276 ; Frelinghuysen v. Frelinghuysen, 80 N.J. Eq. 482 , 485 ; Moore v. Moore, 84 N.J. Eq. 39 , 42 ; affirmed, 85 N.J. Eq. 150 . … In Davis v. Scharf, 99 N.J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Zane v. Brown

    126 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 28, 1939

    Brown recovered against it. Cf. Corson v. Bailey, 98 N.J. Eq. 323 . Nor does the alleged insolvency of Mr. Brown alter this disposition of the matter. Trotter v. Heckscher, 40 N.J. … Tate v. Security Trust Co., 63 N.J. Eq. 559 ; Sipley v. Wass, 49 N.J. Eq. 463 ; George F. Perry Sons, Inc., v. Mand, 110 N.J. Eq. 111 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gaskill

    74 N.J. Eq. 620 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 9, 1908

    Leaming, V. C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Brown

    87 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1917

    Lu tjen v. Lutjen, 64 N. J. … In Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Co., 94 U.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Brown

    10 N.J. Eq. 308 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1855

    Brown advanced his money? These circumstances are explained by showing that Mr. … Brown did not purchase as the mere agent of the complainant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Murray

    54 N.J. Eq. 594 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1896

    Palmer, 42 Conn. 60 ; Drake v. Stone, 58 Ala. 136 ; Harley v. Heist, 86 Ind. 197 ), and it refuses, on the other hand, to hold, as the supreme court of Wisconsin, in Foster v. … And see Campbell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co., 98 Mass. 381, 400 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Farley

    38 N.J. Eq. 186 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

    Van Fleet, V. C. The principal object of the suit in this case is to procure a partition to be made of a part of the lands of which Francis Asbury Farley died seized.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Welsh's

    27 N.J. Eq. 429 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1876

    He charged her nothing, however, for her board. She lived in his family as a member of it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vandyke v. Brown

    8 N.J. Eq. 657 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1852

    In this state of things, an account is made out by A. against the Company, and B. assents to it; there being no action of the Board assenting to it. … Brown & Co., and accepted by D. S. Brown & Co. Prima facie the acceptance shows that the New England Manufacturing Co. had funds in the hands of Brown & Co. to the amount of the drafts.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Holcomb

    9 N.J. Eq. 297 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1853

    Brown has this day assigned and set over to the said John R. … Brown from the payment of any of the debts and liabilities of said firm, then this obligation to be void; otherwise, to remain in force and effect.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Balen

    33 N.J. Eq. 469 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881

    Brown, for land in the city of Plainfield. … He says he saw Thorn on the subject, and, in view of the assumption, the latter consented to convey his interest to Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Brown

    7 N.J. Eq. 526 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1849

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.