Case law

Blauvelt v. Ackerman

20 N.J. Eq. 141 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1869

Obert v. Hammell, 3 Harr. 73; Winter v. Geroe, 1 Halst. C. R. 319; Hill on Trustees 158-9 and 535; Scott v. Gamble, 1 Stockt. 218; Ib. 797. … Green v. Winter, 1 Johns. C. R. 27; Parkist v. Alexander, Ib. 394, *149 Schieffelin v. Stewart, Ib. 620; Brown v. Rickets, 4 Johns. C. R. 303; Evertson v. Tappen, 5 Ib. 497; Hawley v. Mancius, 7 Ib. 174; Holridge v.

Murray v. Beattie Manufacturing Co.

79 N.J. Eq. 322 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 27, 1911

See Stevens v. United States Steel Corporation, supra. … See authorities cited in Stevens v. United States Steel Corporation, supra (at pp. 337, 378).

Rinaldi v. Rinaldi

94 N.J. Eq. 14 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 18, 1922

against her entreaties and expression of apprehension that it would be fatal to her, she being kept awake many nights by the pain she suffered during and after intercourse, Chancellor Eunyon decreed a divorce from bed and board … In Firth v. Firth, 50 N. J.

Atlas Fence Co. v. West Ridgelawn Cemetery

120 N.J. Eq. 239 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 30, 1936

The board of trustees is to be elected under the direction of this court to control the cemetery and the lots are to be sold subject to their approval. The bidder to receive ten per centum of the purchase price. … I think this question has been decided by the court of errors and appeals in the case of Atlas Fence Co. v. West Ridgelawn Cemetery, 110 N.J. Eq. 580 .

Lister v. Weeks

60 N.J. Eq. 215 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 17, 1900

He testified that he stated what he had so heard at the February or March meeting of the board. He further testified that it was Mr. … Holcomb v. Coryell, 1 Beas. 289. There is another ground upon which the trustee should be-removed. In May v. May, 167 U. S. 310 , Mr.

Howell v. Ashmore

9 N.J. Eq. 82 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1852

Seymour v. Seymour et al., 4 John. C. R. 409; Bishop of London v. Fytahe, 1 Brown C. C. Rep. 69. … The cases referred to in support of the principle are those of Dunn and others v. Coates and Balguy, 1 Atk.

Schwarz v. Medford Lakes Colony Club

115 N.J. Eq. 465 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 16, 1934

These bathing centers will be protected with ropes and guards, and diving boards will be installed at convenient spots. The facilities for boating and canoeing are unlimited. … It seems to me that the principle involved in this case, in that respect, is that referred to by Vice-Chancellor Leaming in the case of Polakoff v. Halphen, 83 N.J. Eq. 126 ; 89 Atl. Rep. 996 .

Dyer v. Waters

46 N.J. Eq. 484 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890

Partridge v. Wells, 3 Stew. Eq. 176, 178; Marsh v. Oliver, 1 McCart. 259, 262, per Chancellor Green; Buckingham v. Ludlum, 10 Stew. Eq. 137, 144, 14 Stew. Eq. 539. … Attorney-General v. Brewery Company, 1 Meriv. 495; Chalmer v. Bradley, 1 Jac. & W. 51, 64; Ward v. Arch, 12 Sim. *472; Wedderborn v. Wedderborn, 2 Keen 722, 4 Myl. & C. 41; Beaumont v. Boultbee, 5 Ves. 485; Mathew v.

Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent Legion v. Murphy

65 N.J. Eq. 60 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 24, 1903

Grand Lodge v. Child, 70 Mich. 163 . … Splawn v. Chew, 60 Tex. 532 (1883).

Burgin v. Rutherford

56 N.J. Eq. 666 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 16, 1897

Grey, V. C. … Neither the bill nor the proofs raises any question as to the authority of the board having control of the finances of the city, to order a sale for the taxes and assessments named in the bill, at the time when it is stated

Falcon B. L. Assn. v. Schwartz

121 N.J. Eq. 27 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 14, 1936

Hughes v. Nelson, 29 N.J. Eq. 547 ; Smalley v. Line, 28 N.J. Eq. 348 ; Borcherling v. Ruckelshaus, 49 N.J. Eq. 340 ; Headley v. Leavitt, 65 N.J. Eq. 748 . In Headley v. … Eq. 299 ; Clark v. Board of Education, 76 N.J. Eq. 326 ; Gallagher v. L. and B. Eagle Brewing Co., 86 N.J. Eq. 188 ; Young v. Stickley, 88 N.J. Eq. 251 ; Commercial Trust, c., Bank v. Hamilton, 99 N.J.

Toppin v. Moriarty

59 N.J. Eq. 115 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 23, 1899

Stevens, V. C. … The work was completed in November, 1896, and the complainant, having procured from the board of health a permit to remove the body,. was about to disinter it, when the cemetery authorities were notified by Mr.

Gas Light Co. v. Borough of South River

77 N.J. Eq. 487 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 9, 1910

Howell, V. C. … Van Riper v. Essex Public Road Board, 38 N. J. Law (9 Vr.) 23; Barnaby v. Bradley & Currier, 60 N. J. Law (31 Vr.) 158.

In Re North Jersey Title Insurance Co.

120 N.J. Eq. 148 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 15, 1936

Krimke v. Guarantee Building and Loan Association, 112 N.J. Law 317 ; Hourigan v. Township of North Bergen, supra; State, ex rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J. Eq. 504 ; Nebbia v. … Smith v. Washington Casualty Insurance Co., supra. Mr. Justice Heher, speaking for the court of errors and appeals in State, ex rel. State Board of Milk Control v.

Weiland v. Townsend

33 N.J. Eq. 393 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881

Bull v. … Watkins, 3 Bibb 349 ; Tarver v. Haines, 55 Ala. 503 ; Muldrow y. Fox, 2 Dana 74 ; Coleman y. McKinney, 3 J. J. Marsh. 246; Lockwood y. Stradley, 1 Del. Ch. 298 ; Greenough v. Welles, 10 Cush. 571 . Comtba: Brown v.

Thompson v. Tilton

34 N.J. Eq. 306 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1881

Nelson, 50 Mo. 256 ; Beers v. Beers, 22 Mich. 42 ; Burrell v. Root, 40 N. Y. 406 ; Wemple v. Knopf, 15 Minn. 440 ; Ahrend v. Odiorne, 118 Mass. 861 ; Bonham v. Craig, 80 N. C. 824 ; Ballard v. … That a parol reservation of crops from a written contract of sale or deed for the lands whereon the crops are growing, is void, see Vanderkarr v. Thompson, 19 Mich. S2; Bloom v. Welsh, 3 Dutch. 179; Brown v.

Clausen v. Leary

113 N.J. Eq. 324 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1933

Thomas v. Scheible, 91 N.J. Eq. 451 . … Wills § 1037; Finlay v. King's Lessee, 28 U.S. 346 ; Wheeler v. Walker, 2 Conn. 196 ; Fox v. Phelps, 17 Wend. (N.Y.) 393; Barruso v. Madan, 2 Johns. (N.Y.) 145.

Executors of Taylor v. Trustees of Bryn Mawr College

34 N.J. Eq. 101 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

King, president of the board. The will is dated on the 19th day of February, 1877, and the codicil on the 25th of October following. The testator died in January, 1880. … See, also, Emery v. Hill, 1 Russ. 112; Martin v. Paxton, cited therein, and Minet v. Vulliamy, in note; Mitford v. Reynolds, 1 Phil. 185 ; Forbes v. Forbes. 18 Beav. 552, and Collyer v. Burnett, Taml. 79.

Thomas v. International Silver Co.

72 N.J. Eq. 224 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1907

No substantial change in the situation upon this branch of the case has occurred since the matter was passed upon by the court of errors and appeals in O’Connor v. International Silver Co., 68 N. J. … holders of the stock of the International company, one of them being the complainant in this cause, requesting the attendance of stockholders at the next annual meeting, for the purpose of securing representation on the board

Belsky v. Loeffler

120 N.J. Eq. 352 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 5, 1936

The irons were on or near a wooden pressing board or a work table and close to a wooden partition in the workroom, in which were hanging many light and inflammable dresses. … In Carlay v. Liberty Hat Manufacturing Co., 81 N.J. Law 502 , it was held that this statute was remedial, and therefore should be liberally construed.