Case law

Jenkinson v. New York Finance Co.

79 N.J. Eq. 247 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1911

Board of Education v. Duparquet (Vice-Chancellor Pitney, 1892), 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 234, 242; approved in Miller v. Stockton (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1905), 64 N. J. Law (35 Vr.) 614, 622; Cogan v. … Spencer v. Clarke (Vice-Chancellor Hall, 1878), 9 Ch. Div. 143; In re Werniger’s Policy (Mr. Justice Porter, 1910), 2 Ch. 291. The other cases relied on are: Board of Education v.

Mellick v. Mellick

47 N.J. Eq. 86 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1890

PlTNEY, V. C. … Miller, 3 Vr. 296 ; Osborne v. Tunis, 1 Dutch. 633; Shields v. Lozear, 5 Vr. 496 ; Verner v. Betz, 1 Dick. Ch.

Seminara v. Grisman

137 N.J. Eq. 307 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1945

See Garrett v. Garrett, 86 N.J. Eq. 293 , 300 ; 98 Atl. Rep. 848 ; White v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N.J. Law 350 , 354 ; 8 Atl. Rep. 2d 819. … Ryerson v. Adams, 6 N.J. Eq. 618 ; Dixon v. Dixon, 22 N.J. Eq. 91 ; Warnock v. Campbell, 25 N.J. Eq. 485 ; Mead v. Coombs, 26 N.J. Eq. 173 ; O'Conner v. Rempt, 29 N.J. Eq. 156 .

Hutchins's v. George

44 N.J. Eq. 124 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1888

Y. 525 ; Brown v. Yeale, 7 Ves. 50, note; Owens v. Missionary Society, 14 N. Y. 380, 397, 403 . … It is said, further, that in Brown v. Pancoast, 7 Stew.

Beth Hamedresh Hagadol v. Isserman

121 N.J. Eq. 335 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 13, 1937

It was first cited and recognized by Vice-Chancellor Grey in Burgin v. Rutherford, 56 N.J. Eq. 666 , again by Vice-Chancellor Bergen and the court of errors and appeals in Board of Home Missions v. Davis, 70 N.J. … Eq. 788 ; by Vice-Chancellor Griffin in Northrup v. Ackerman, 84 N.J. Eq. 117 ; again by the court of errors and appeals in Kiernan v. Jersey City, 80 N.J. Law 273 , and in West New York Improvement Co. v.

Reading v. Wilson

38 N.J. Eq. 446 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1884

power thus conferred upon him, he received estate belonging to his ward of the value of $14,000; in 1875, he was directed by an order of the court, which appointed him, to pay to the mother of the infant $10 a week, for the board … The complainant rests his right to relief mainly, if not wholly, on the authority of Barnum v. Frost, 17 Gratt. 398 .

Bull v. International Power Co.

84 N.J. Eq. 6 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1914

Hodge v. United States Steel Corporation, 64 N. J. Eq. 111 ; Fort Wayne Electric Corporation v. Franklin Electric Light Co., 57 N. J. Eq. 16; affirmed, 58 N. J. Eq. 543; Catlin v. Vichachi Mining Co., 73 N. J. Eq. 286. … See the tests laid down in Trust Company v. Trustees of William F. Fisher &, Co., 67 N. J. Eq. 602; Catlin v. Vichachi Mining Co., supra.

Ocean City Title, C., Co. v. Strand Properties

106 N.J. Eq. 25 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 25, 1930

Thomas v. International Silver Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 224 . … General Investment Co. v. American Hide, c., Co., 98 N.J. Eq. 326 .

In Re Levy

137 N.J. Eq. 575 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 7, 1946

Eq. 591 ; Salem v. Board of Health, 76 N.J. Eq. 264 . In Fraser v. Fraser, 77 N.J. Eq. 205 ; affirmed, 78 N.J. … In Codwise v.

Benham v. Hendrickson

32 N.J. Eq. 441 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1880

The fence on the street and on the south side of the lot was a paling fence, and on the north and east sides it was what is called a board fence. … Youmans v. Youmans, 11 C. E. Gr. 149; Lore v. Stiles, 10 C. E. Gr. 381, and cases there cited. And it is manifest that the complainants have not an adequate remedy at law.

Piggly-Wiggly Delaware, Inc. v. Bartlett

2 N.J. Misc. 911 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 1, 1924

Ingersoll, V. C. … Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper, &c., Co., 74 N. J. Eq. 492. There'is no allegation in the bill that the stock (in question) was ever issued to Bartlett or his associates.

Helme v. Strater

52 N.J. Eq. 591 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1894

Griggs v. Veghte, 2 Dick. Ch. Rep. 179; Chambers v. Storil, 2 Ves. & B. 224; Dickson v. Robinson, 1 Jac. 503; Roberts v. Smith, 1 Sm. & S. 513; Goodfellow v. Goodfellow, 18 Beav. 356; Reynolds v. … Howe v. Earl of Dartmouth, 7 Ves. 137; Gibson v. Bott, 7 Ves. 89; Fearns v. Young, 9 Ves. 549;. Meyer v. Simonsen, 5 De G. & S. 723; 21 L. J. Ch. 678; Brown v. Gellatly, L. R. 2 Ch. App. 751; Kinmonth v.

Mayor, C., Jersey City v. Coppinger

101 N.J. Eq. 185 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 13, 1927

In Hutton v. Camden, 39 N.J. … In Bailey v. Schnitzius, 45 N.J.

Second National Bank of Phila. v. Thompson

141 N.J. Eq. 188 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 31, 1947

As stated in Clark v. Board of Education, 76 N.J. Eq. 326 ; 74 Atl. … See, also, Clark v. Board of Education of Bayonne, supra; Royal Arcanum v. Carley, supra; Giehrach v. Rupp, 112 N.J. Eq. 296 ; 164 Atl. Rep. 465 .

Rockaway Rolling Mill Corp. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

101 N.J. Eq. 192 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 21, 1927

Mason v. Ross, supra. … Justice Brown, in delivering the opinion in affirmance, said (at p. 475) : “It may, notwithstanding the case of Brearley v.

Streit v. Citizens Fire Insurance

29 N.J. Eq. 21 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

Rawnsley v. Trenton Ins. … It is true, the board of directors of this company may not have deemed it advisable and most for the benefit of the corporation that it should be dissolved.

Jones v. Knauss

31 N.J. Eq. 211 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879

Coombs, 8 Nev. é M. 212); during a detention of a month as a witness before a master (Brown v. McDermott, 2 Ir. Eq. 338 ; Burke v. Higgins, 2 Hogan 110 ; Gibbs v. … Eg. 135; Strong v. Dickenson, 1 M. & W. 488; Jones v. Rose, 11 Jur. 879; Hatch v. Blissett, 3 Sir. 983; Ricketts v. Gurney, 7 Price 699; Sidgier v. Birch, 9 Ves. 69; Ex parte GlarJce, 2 Dea. & Ch. 99; Mahon v.

Wilson v. Stevens

105 N.J. Eq. 377 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1929

Weinberger v. Brumberg, 69 N.J. Eq. 669 ; Fritz v. Simpson, 34 N.J. Eq. 436 . … In Mulford v. Brown, 28 Atl. Rep. 513 (apparently not officially reported), there was no real evidence as to how the bond and mortgage had become lost.

McCulloch v. Tomkins

62 N.J. Eq. 262 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1901

Grey, V. C. … Baker, a widow, with whom he presently boards, and he claims that he paid the sum of $3,100 in cash for this house, undertaking, also, the payment of a $2,900 mortgage already on the property, making the total purchase-money

Boney v. Williams

55 N.J. Eq. 691 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1897

See principles laid *700 down in Wilkinson v. Bauerle, 14 Stew. Eq. 644. … No proof is offered of any corporate action by the board of directors or stockholders of the hotel company.