Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.39s

  • Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Central Railroad

    16 N.J. Eq. 419 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1863

    Brown, 4 Zab. 87. … That question came up in the case of The State v. Brown, 3 Dutcher, 13, and the Chief Justice, in delivering the opinion of the court, expressly declined giving an opinion upon it.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Jenkinson v. New York Finance Co.

    79 N.J. Eq. 247 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1911

    Board of Education v. Duparquet (Vice-Chancellor Pitney, 1892), 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 234, 242; approved in Miller v. Stockton (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1905), 64 N. J. Law (35 Vr.) 614, 622; Cogan v. … Spencer v. Clarke (Vice-Chancellor Hall, 1878), 9 Ch. Div. 143; In re Werniger’s Policy (Mr. Justice Porter, 1910), 2 Ch. 291. The other cases relied on are: Board of Education v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re New Jersey State Bar Assn.

    111 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 16, 1932

    In Moreau v. Freeholders of Monmouth, 68 N.J. Law 480 (at p. 481 ), Mr. Justice Dixon cites the case of Board of Commissioners of White County v. … See Marshall v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ogden v. Thornton

    30 N.J. Eq. 569 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1879

    Kuhl v. Martin, 2 Stew. 586 ; Walker v. Armstrong, 8 DeG. M. & J. 534; Lewis v. Darling, 16 How. 6 ; Lum v. … A similar amendment had previously been permitted in Wilson v. Brown, 2 Beas. 277, a case substantially like that of Armstrong v. Ross.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hirschmann v. Hirschmann

    135 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 24, 1944

    See Riehl v. Riehl ( third headnote ), 101 N.J. Eq. 15 ; 137 Atl. Rep. 787 . … In Hackensack Trust Co. v. Nowacki, 124 N.J. Eq. 565 ; 3 Atl. Rep. 2d 615 , citing Hall v. Otterson, 52 N.J. Eq. 522 (at p. 528 ); 28 Atl.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Higgins v. Mispeth

    118 N.J. Eq. 575 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 13, 1935

    In Kutschinski v. … Brown v. Mugway, 15 N. J. Law 330; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Clark, 96 N. J. Eq. 550; 126 Atl.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.

    136 N.J. Eq. 571 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 18, 1945

    Kroecker v. … Rep. 440 (not reported in the state reports); State, Lyndhurst Township Board of Health v. United Cork Co., 116 N.J. Eq. 4 ; 172 Atl. Rep. 347 ; affirmed, 117 N.J. Eq. 437 ; 176 Atl. Rep. 142 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Williams v. McDonald

    37 N.J. Eq. 409 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

    This suit is brought by the receiver of the Mechanics and Laborers Savings Bank of Jersey City, to compel the defendant, one of the board of managers of the bank, to indemnify the institution against the loss sustained upon … In Hodges v. N. E. Screw Co., 1 R. I. 312, 3 R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dvorin v. Bayonne

    111 N.J. Eq. 52 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 25, 1932

    In Tweddell v. … only at a corporate meeting; and that its legislative and discretionary powers can be exercised only by the coming together of the members who compose such body, and that the corporate body can do no valid act except as a board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Main v. Main

    50 N.J. Eq. 712 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1892

    Greek, V. C. ” This case was tried before me and submitted, in April last. … In Warner v. Warner, 4 Stew.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fortescue v. Bowler

    55 N.J. Eq. 741 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1897

    It came on the premises as lumber, boards and tin for the roof, and when it had been put there, with the addition of the labor of those who were there for the purpose of making the structure, it became the building now in … Lord Hardwicke, in Farrant v. Lovell, 3 Atk. 723, held that waste in an under-lessee being shown, the ground landlord had the same equity as in other cases of injunction to stay waste. In Ware v. Ware, 2 Halst.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cleveland v. Carson

    37 N.J. Eq. 377 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

    See Osborne v. Varney, 7 Mete. SOI; Savage v. Mears, 2 Bob. {Va.) 570; Gelslon v. Shields, 16 Hun 143 , 78 N. T. 275. In Brokaw v. … See Morton v. Morton, S Swan 318; Jones’s Appeal, JJS Conn. 60. In Goddard v. Brown, IS B.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Henninger v. Heald

    52 N.J. Eq. 431 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1894

    Bird, V. C. … McNamara, 14 Ves. 91; Crowe v. Ballard, 3 Brown Ch. 104, *120; Massey v. Davies, 2 Ves. 317. But our own courts have had this very question under consideration. Marsh v. Buchan, 1 Dick. Ch.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Christiansen v. Local 680, Milk Drivers, C.

    126 N.J. Eq. 508 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1940

    Board of Commissioners, c., of Vineland v. Maretti, 93 N.J. Eq. 513 ; Kuskin v. Guttman, 98 N.J. Eq. 617 ; 99 N.J. Eq. 887 ; Baum v. Canter, 104 N.J. Eq. 224 ; New Order Building and Loan Association v. Landau, 9 N.J. … Springdale Corp. v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 121 N.J. Law 536 ; Moresh v. O'Regan, 122 N.J. Eq. 388 ; Union Trust Co. v. Goerke, 103 N.J. Eq. 159 ; 105 N.J. Eq. 190 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In Re Levy

    137 N.J. Eq. 575 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 7, 1946

    Eq. 591 ; Salem v. Board of Health, 76 N.J. Eq. 264 . In Fraser v. Fraser, 77 N.J. Eq. 205 ; affirmed, 78 N.J. … In Codwise v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robins v. Robins

    103 N.J. Eq. 26 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1928

    On May 21st, 1926, the complainant secured a judgment in the New York supreme court divorcing the parties from bed and board and allowing to the complainant, for the support of herself and her children, the sum of $55 per … Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, in Hunter v. Hunter, 64 N.J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mayor, C., Jersey City v. Coppinger

    101 N.J. Eq. 185 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 13, 1927

    In Hutton v. Camden, 39 N.J. … In Bailey v. Schnitzius, 45 N.J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thorp v. Smith

    63 N.J. Eq. 70 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 8, 1902

    Other cases containing an accurate statement of the rule covering the present case are Mulock v. Mulock, 4 Stew. Eq. 594 (at pp. 601, 603); Haydock v. Haydock, 7 Stew. Eq. 570 (at pp. 573, 576) ; Pironi v. … Rep. 135 (at p. 155); Farmer v. Farmer, 12 Stew. Eq. 211 (at p. 216); White v. White, 15 Dick. Ch. Rep. 104.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Morrison v. Morrison

    94 N.J. Eq. 646 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 8, 1922

    Griffin, V. C. … I will not deal at length with this question because it is fully covered in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens in Pearce v. Stines, 79. N J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hutchins's v. George

    44 N.J. Eq. 124 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1888

    Y. 525 ; Brown v. Yeale, 7 Ves. 50, note; Owens v. Missionary Society, 14 N. Y. 380, 397, 403 . … It is said, further, that in Brown v. Pancoast, 7 Stew.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.