Case law

White v. Thomas Inflatable Tire Co.

52 N.J. Eq. 178 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1893

Pitney, V. C. The complainants advance three propositions — First. … This point was directly ruled, after full discussion and consideration, in the cases of Bostwick v. Chapman and Starbuck v.

Dvorin v. Bayonne

111 N.J. Eq. 52 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 25, 1932

In Tweddell v. … only at a corporate meeting; and that its legislative and discretionary powers can be exercised only by the coming together of the members who compose such body, and that the corporate body can do no valid act except as a board

Kinkead v. Ryan

64 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 14, 1903

In the case of Teets v. … In the same volume is found a decision (In the matter of Brown, 313) which supports the complainant’s position herein. The other case relied on by the defendant (Clark v. Cammann, 160 N.

Prudential Ins. Co. v. Fidelity, C., Co.

102 N.J. Eq. 281 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 6, 1928

*Page 286 In Anderson v. Broad Street National Bank, 90 N.J. … See, also, Farmer Coal and Supply Co. v. Albright, 90 N.J. Eq. ( Vice-Chancellor Foster ) 132; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Zgliczenski, 94 N.J.

Drummond's v. Drummond

26 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1875

So, too, in Jackson v. … . & K. 110, in opposition to that of Lord Langdale, in Jackson v. Noble. In Joslin v.

Christiansen v. Local 680, Milk Drivers, C.

126 N.J. Eq. 508 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1940

Board of Commissioners, c., of Vineland v. Maretti, 93 N.J. Eq. 513 ; Kuskin v. Guttman, 98 N.J. Eq. 617 ; 99 N.J. Eq. 887 ; Baum v. Canter, 104 N.J. Eq. 224 ; New Order Building and Loan Association v. Landau, 9 N.J. … Springdale Corp. v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 121 N.J. Law 536 ; Moresh v. O'Regan, 122 N.J. Eq. 388 ; Union Trust Co. v. Goerke, 103 N.J. Eq. 159 ; 105 N.J. Eq. 190 .

Devine v. Devine

89 N.J. Eq. 51 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 16, 1918

Leaming, V. C. … Accordingly, in the absence of wrong-doing on the husband’s part, he may require his wife’s return to his bed and board, and her refusal will not only constitute her an obstinate deserter, but will deny to her any right to

Williams v. McDonald

37 N.J. Eq. 409 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

This suit is brought by the receiver of the Mechanics and Laborers Savings Bank of Jersey City, to compel the defendant, one of the board of managers of the bank, to indemnify the institution against the loss sustained upon … In Hodges v. N. E. Screw Co., 1 R. I. 312, 3 R.

Davenport v. Davenport

67 N.J. Eq. 320 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 1, 1904

Grey, V. C. This cause has been well prepared and ably presented by counsel on both sides. … This testimony was objected to, but was received on the authority of Rusling v. Rusling, 36 N. J. Eq. (9 Stew.) 603, and Sugden v. St. Leonards, *336 L. R. 1 Prob.

Vought v. Vought

50 N.J. Eq. 177 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892

Bird, V. C. The bill in this case declares that Philip G. Vought, being the owner of a lot of land in Freehold, in consideration of $1,000 in hand paid to him by Louisa S. … Ch. 357; Brown v. Combs, 5 Dutch. 36; Skillman v. Skillman, 2 Beas. 403; Woodruff v. Clark, 13 Vr. 198 . In my judgment, these cases do not carry the complainants to the point they aim at—a declaration of trust.

Bird v. Davis

14 N.J. Eq. 467 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1862

Mole v. Smith. 1 Jac. & W. 648; Hughes v. Evans, 1 Sim. & Stu. 185; 1 Daniell's Ch. Prac. 142; Johnson, v. Vail, Ante 423. … Cited in Marshman v. Conklin, 2 C. E. Gr. 285 and 288; Staats v. Bergen, 2 C. E. Gr. 303; Cramer v. Reford, 2 C. E. Gr. 384 ; Galway v. Fullerton, 2 C. E. Gr. 393; Dudley v. Bergen, 8 C. E. Gr. 401.

Corby v. Drew

55 N.J. Eq. 387 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1897

It was said by Chancellor Green in Moore v. … In Wooden v. Morris, 2 Gr.

Blancard v. Blancard & Co.

2 N.J. Misc. 552 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 23, 1924

Bentley, V. C. … Therefore, under the statute as it exists, I could not substitute my judgment for that of the board, even though it might differ therefrom.

Robins v. Robins

103 N.J. Eq. 26 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1928

On May 21st, 1926, the complainant secured a judgment in the New York supreme court divorcing the parties from bed and board and allowing to the complainant, for the support of herself and her children, the sum of $55 per … Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, in Hunter v. Hunter, 64 N.J.

Federal Shipbuilding, C., Co. v. Bayonne

102 N.J. Eq. 475 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 19, 1928

Breninger v. Belvidere, 44 N.J. Law 350 ; State, Terhune v. City of Passaic, 41 N.J. Law 90 , 93 . … Meday v. Rutherford, 65 N.J. Law 645 , 648 .

Atha v. Jewell

33 N.J. Eq. 417 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881

Parsons v. Copeland, 88 Me. 587 ; West-ervelt v. Hag, 2 Sandf. Ch. 98; Annely v. Be Sanssme, 12 S. C. {N. S.) 488; Coble v. Clapp, 1 Jones Eq. 178 ; Taylor v. Foster, 22 Ohio St. 255 . … Crafts v. Crafts, 18 Gray 860 ; Hoyt v. Kimball, 49 N. H. 822; Qrier v. Fletcher, 1 Ired. 417 ; Beardsley v. Knight, 10 Vt. 185 .

Freund v. Freund

71 N.J. Eq. 524 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1906

York (where they both resided) previous to February, 1884, when she brought suit against him in the city court of Brooklyn, and that on February 28th, 1884, by the judgment of that court, they were separated from bed and board … Burr v. Burr, 7 Hill 207 (Court of Errors, 1843); Forrest v. Forrest, 25 N. Y. 501, 514 (1862); Burrows v. Purple, 107 Mass. 428, 435 (1871). And this practice has been approved in our courts. Glasser v. Glasser, 28 N.

O'Brien v. Humes

95 N.J. Eq. 436 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 28, 1924

Foster, V. C. This action is brought to obtain a construction of certain provisions of the will of Karl G-. … By paragraph 3 he made special and independent provision for the education, support and maintenance of his children, and under this provision the boy is now in college, the older girl is in a boarding school, and the youngest

Pillsbury v. Kingon

31 N.J. Eq. 619 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1879

Chancellor Kent, in Bayard v. Hoffman, 4 Johns. … Baldwin v. Johnson, Sax. 441; Dyer v. Clark, 5 Metc. 562 ; Story on Fartn. § 93. The deed was therefore a fraud on the partnership.

Town of Kearny v. N.Y. N.J. Water Co.

105 N.J. Eq. 368 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 12, 1929

Long Branch Comm. v. Tintern Manor Water Co., 70 N.J. Eq. 71 ; Collingswood S. Co. v. Collingswood, 91 N.J. Law 20 . … Hackensack Water Co. v. Board, c., of Comm'rs., 96 N.J. Law 184 .