Case law

Morgan v. Morgan

15 N.J. Misc. 101 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 24, 1936

Kutschinski v. Kutschinski, 112 N. J. Eq. 341; 164 Atl. Rep. 560 (Court of Errors and Appeals)) Brown v. Brown, 112 N. J. Eq. 600; 166 Atl. Rep. 643 . … In the ease of Brown v. Brown, 112 N. J. Eq. 600 (at p. 605); 165 Atl.

Hood v. Francis

137 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1945

Where the power is general, the donee of the power may appoint to various persons in varying amounts ( Brown v. … And in Board of Home Missions, c. , v. Saltmer, 125 N.J. Eq. 33 , 36 ; 4 Atl.

Douglass v. Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church of America

110 N.J. Eq. 331 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 14, 1932

In Den v. Crawford, 8 N. J. … In the third clause he bequeaths $10,000 each to the foreign and. home missionary boards of that organization.

Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. Glass Bottle Blowers' Ass'n of the United States & Canada

59 N.J. Eq. 49 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 14, 1899

In Vegelahn v. … Barr v. Essex Trades Union, 8 Dick. Ch. Rep. 101; In re Debs, 158 U. S. 564 ; Cœur D’Alene Consolidated Mining Co. v. Miners’ Union, 51 Fed. Rep. 260; Vegelahn v. Gunther, supra, and cases cited.

State ex rel. State Board of Health v. Mayor of Jersey City

55 N.J. Eq. 116 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1896

Pitney, V. C. The bill is filed under the second section of the act of May 24th, 1894. P. L. of 1894 P- 495; Gen. Stat. pp. 1646, 1647. … This *127 legislation has been before the court of errors and appeals several times; once in Hutchinson v. Board of Health, 12 Stew.

Helena Rubinstein, Inc. v. Charline's Cut Rate

132 N.J. Eq. 254 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 11, 1942

Block v. Hirsh ( 1921 ), 256 U.S. 135 . See, also, Levy Leasing Co. v. Siegel ( 1922 ), 258 U.S. 242 , and Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, supra. … Ryan ( 1935 ), 293 U.S. 388 , 421 ; State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., supra.

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Roest

113 N.J. Eq. 368 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 5, 1933

Justice Holmes in Klein v. Board of Tax Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19 : "The corporation is a person and the ownership is a nonconductor that makes it impossible to attribute an interest in its property to its members." … Shortly before, in In re Brown's Ex., 226 N.Y.

Van Hook v. Somerville Manufacturing Co.

5 N.J. Eq. 137 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 15, 1845

Brown, esquire,. January 10th, at 5, P. M. 1842. When these two entries were made, was not shown. … The *175 case of Barrow v.

Pedrick v. Pedrick

48 N.J. Eq. 313 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1891

Similar to this case was the case of Flanders v. … Pow. 168; 4 Kent Com. 344; Wortman v. Skinner, 1 Beas. 358. Such power was held to exist in the case of Brown v.

In re Schmidt

88 N.J. Eq. 21 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 1, 1917

While the ex parte affidavit cannot be used on the hearing of this rule (Staley v. South Jersey Realty Co., 83 N. J. … Rep. 29, in which Judge Brown, in the United States district court for the southern district of New York, held that an unlawful ousting of the court, its officers and records, from their rooms, would be a contempt; and that

McCoy v. McCloskey

94 N.J. Eq. 60 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 19, 1922

VanDoren v. Olden, 19 N. J. Eq. 176; Ashurst v. Field, 26 N. J. Eq. 1; Van Blarcom v. Dager, 31 N. J. Eq. 783; Outcalt v. Appleby, 36 N. J. Eq. 73; Pratt v. Douglas, 38 N. J. Eq. 516; Lang v. Lang, 56 N. J. … Eq. 325; Brown v. Brown, 72 N. J. Eq. 667; Day v. Faulks, 79 N. J. Eq. 66, and McCracken v. Gulick, 112 Atl. Rep. 317 . There is no obscurity in the testamentary scheme.

E. Jersey Water Co. v. Newark

96 N.J. Eq. 231 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 12, 1924

See Astley v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Newark, 119 Atl. Rep. 187, 188 . … Brown v. Brown, 6 Stew. Eq. 650, 654; Blake v. Flatley, 17 Stew. Eq. 228; Rothholz v. Schwarts, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 477. * * *.

Long Branch Banking Co. v. Howland

133 N.J. Eq. 315 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 24, 1943

Brown, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, applied to this court for permission to intervene in this cause pursuant to section 205 (d) of The Emergency Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C. … Helena Rubenstein, Inc. , v. Charlene Cut Rate, Inc., 132 N.J. Eq. 254 .

Stulz-Sickles Co. v. Fredburn Constr. Corp.

114 N.J. Eq. 475 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 17, 1933

Greenberg v. Leff, supra; Glades *Page 478 County, Florida v. Detroit Fidelity and Surety Co., supra; Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654 ; 41 L.Ed. 865 . This right exists irrespective of statute. … Nor are Board of Education of the City of Elizabeth v. Zinc, 101 N.J. Eq. 78 ; John W. Barwell, Inc., v. Vail, 108 N.J. Eq. 117 or Board of Education of Linden v. Vail, Ibid. 207 , applicable to this controversy.

State ex rel. Board of Health v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Powder Co.

79 N.J. Eq. 31 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 4, 1911

Butterfoss v. State (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1885), 40 N. J. Eq. (13 Stew.) 325; State, ex rel. Board of Health, v. Niedt, 19 Atl. Rep. 318 ; State, ex rel. Board of Health, v. … Board of Health v. Summit (1903), 56 Atl. Rep. 125 .

Point Breeze Ferry & Improvement Co. v. Bragaw

47 N.J. Eq. 298 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1890

Boon v. Kent, 15 Stew. Eq. 131. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Mague, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Cole, Smith — 9.

Katzenbach v. Armstrong Cork Co.

99 N.J. Eq. 32 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 24, 1926

Bell v. Gough, 23 N.J. Law 624 . … Morris Canal, c., Co. v. C.R.R. Co., 16 N.J. Eq. 419 ; Townsend v. Brown, 24 N.J. Law 80 , 87 ; McCran v. Erie R.R. Co., 95 N.J. Eq. 653 , 656 ; New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Morris Canal Co., 44 N.J. Eq. 398 .

Mary S. Fithian Night School & Academy v. College Board of Presbyterian Church in United States

88 N.J. Eq. 468 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 8, 1918

Leaming, V. C. … The decree in Harris v.

Walsche v. Sherlock

110 N.J. Eq. 223 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 24, 1932

Rep. 547 , a delay of two or three years before the final tribunal met was considered sufficient to excuse the exhaustion of remedies within the order; and in Brown v. … Eq. 761; O’Brien v. Musical Mutual P. & B. Union, supra; Brown v. Supreme Court, Independent Order of Foresters, supra; Erdman v. Mitchell, 207 Pa. 79 ; 56 Atl. Rep. 327 ; Jersey City Printing Co. v. Cassidy, 63 N. J.

Driver v. Smith

89 N.J. Eq. 339 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 24, 1918

Taylor Iron and Steel Co. v. Nichols, supra. In Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. … Lumley v. Gye, 2 E. & B. 216; Quinn v. Leathem, supra; Notice v. Brown, supra; Frank & Dugan v. Herold, 63 N. J. Eq. 443; Jonas Glass Co. v. Glass Bottle Blowers’ Association, supra; Hinchman Coal and Iron Co. v.