Case law

Annin v. Annin

24 N.J. Eq. 184 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1873

Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139. Such embarrassment, however, will not exist in this case. … In Bullett v. Worthington, 3 Md. Ch. 99 , and in Warner v.

Wagner v. Phillips

78 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 12, 1911

v. … Warwick v. Lawrence (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1887), 43 N. J. Eq. (16 Stew.) 179, 184.

McGann v. La Brecque Co.

90 N.J. Eq. 526 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 3, 1919

Hart v. Leonard, 42 N. J. Eq. 416 (sixth subdivision); Public Service Corporation v. Westfield, 82 N. J. Eq. 43, 47; affirmed, 82 N. J. Eq. 662; Kiernan v. Jersey City, 76 N. J. Eq: 114; Allen v. Distillers Co., 87 N. … Clark v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 76 N. J. Eq. 326.

Cory v. Cory

3 N.J. Eq. 400 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1857

So it has been considered in New Jersey; although in Butler v. … The old man, left alone, was obliged to break up keeping house, and to take board with one of his neighbors. The consequence was, that when the complainant returned, her husband had no home provided for her.

Shoup v. Dowsey

134 N.J. Eq. 440 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 25, 1944

In Gibson v. … Rep. 683 ; Daly v. Watson, 118 N.J. Eq. 258 ; 178 Atl. Rep. 781 ; affirmed, 121 N.J. Eq. 250 ; 190 Atl. Rep. 323 ; Sun Building and Loan Association v. Rashkes, supra. See, also, Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N.J.

Corle v. Monkhouse

47 N.J. Eq. 73 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1890

Brown, 14 Vr. 37 , 41, and Davison v. Rake, 17 Stew. Eq. 506, 508. … And Wigram, V. C., said, in Hinves v.

Carpender v. New Brunswick

135 N.J. Eq. 397 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 30, 1944

Oberon Land Co. v. Dunn, 56 N.J. Eq. 749 ; 40 Atl. Rep. 121 ; Freeholders of County of Cumberland v. Buck, 79 N.J. Eq. 472 ; 82 Atl. Rep. 418 ; Board of Education, Borough of West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N.J. … United States v. Tennessee and C.R. Co., 176 U.S. 242 ; Lake Superior, c., Co. v. Cunningham, 155 U.S. 354 , 372 .

Edison v. Edison Polyform & Manufacturing Co.

73 N.J. Eq. 136 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 22, 1907

Dockrell v. Dougall differs from Clark v. … If a man’s name be his own property, as no less an authority than the United States supreme court says, it is (Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U.

Magnolia Construction Co. v. McQuillan

94 N.J. Eq. 342 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1923

Fielder, V. C. … Haggerty v. McCanna, 25 N. J. Eq. 48; Kirchner v. Miller, 39 N. J. Eq. 355.

Randolph v. Mt. Zion Baptist Church

139 N.J. Eq. 605 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 1, 1947

Height v. Democratic Women's Luncheon Club, c., 131 N.J. Eq. 450 ; Normandy v. Ind. Co-op. Co. ( 1908 ), 1 Ch. 84; Jones v. Commonwealth Edison Co. (Ill.), 18 N.E. Rep. 2d 113. … As to infant's right to vote, generally, see Chicago Mutual, c., Association v. Hunt (Ill.), 20 N.E. Rep. 55 , and Bailey v. Y.W.C.A. (Pa.), 109 Atl. Rep. 690 .

Liebers v. Plainfield, C., Building Co.

108 N.J. Eq. 391 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 12, 1931

Underhill v. Atwater, 22 N.J. Eq. 16 , 599 ; Martin v. Bowen, 51 N.J. Eq. 452 . After the second advancement of $25,000 was made, $12,500 was returned to the complainant. … Felin v. Arrow Motor Machine Co., 96 N.J. Eq. 44 ; Commercial Funding Corporation v. Melroy Construction Co., 106 N.J. Eq. 11 .

Newark Milk & Cream Co. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 680

19 N.J. Misc. 468 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 27, 1941

Stein, V. C. … F. of L. v. Swing, 85 L. Ed. 513 ; 61 Sup. Ct. Rep. 568.” In the Meadowmoor Case injunction issued restraining all conduct, violent and peaceful.

Job Haines Home for Aged People v. Keene

87 N.J. Eq. 509 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1917

In Stevenson v. Brown, 4 N. J. Eq. 503, certain lands were devised for life to testator’s widow, and it was held that “the widow was at liberty to take her dower in' the lands, or to accept the devise. … Pratt v. Douglass, supra.

Bahr v. Breeze Corps., Inc.

126 N.J. Eq. 124 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 25, 1939

Colleton v. Malmstrom, 8 N.J. Mis. R. 418; 150 Atl. Rep. 230 . … Depew v. Colton, 60 N.J. Eq. 454 .

Long Branch v. Highlands, C., Steamboat Co.

134 N.J. Eq. 266 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 27, 1943

In Jersey City v. Board of Assessors, 73 N.J. Law 164 , Mr. Justice Swayze, speaking for the Supreme Court, said: "The proper method of assessment must be determined by the nature of the title of the defendants. … In Ehren Realty Co. v. Magna Charta Building and Loan Association, 120 N.J. Eq. 136 , Vice-Chancellor Bigelow said: "The tax sale is based upon the assessment. Nothing passes thereby except what has been assessed."

Meier v. Planer

107 N.J. Eq. 398 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 29, 1930

In Freeman v. … In Murphy v. Murphy, 102 N.J.

Giusto v. Giusto

80 N.J. Eq. 355 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 10, 1912

Garrison, V. C. … He gives a reason for leaving the boarding place where he had been previously. and to which he returned, which is incredible and evidently a mere pretext.

Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'n

81 N.J. Eq. 394 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 24, 1913

Eq. (2 Stew.) 36; Tay *397 lor v. Bryn Mawr College, 34 N. J. Eq. (7 Stew.) 101 Hesketh v. Murphy, 35 N. J. Eq. (8 Stew.) 23; Mills v. Davison, 54 N. J. Eq. (9 Dick.) 659; MacKenzie v. Trustees, 67 N. J. … Green v. Blackwell, 35 Atl.

Burack v. Mayers

121 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 30, 1936

Security Trust, c., Co. v. Paper Board Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 603 ; Church of Sacred Heart v. Pingree Holding Co., 105 N.J. Eq. 97 . … Guttenberg v. Vassel, 74 N.J. Law 553 ; Vanderbeek v. Tierney-Connelly Co., 77 N.J. Law 664 ; Van Hoesen v. Gelfen, 103 N.J. Eq. 234 ; 110 N.J. Eq. 69 ; Mann v. Bugbee, 113 N.J. Eq. 434 .

Burlew v. Hillman

16 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1863

The lowest rate at which she could procure board in the vicinity where she lives, is shown to be two dollars per week, and the cost of clothing suitable to her station in life, is shown to be fifty dollars per annum. … See cases collected in note to Cranstown v. Johnston, 1 Hovenden’s Sup. to Vesey Jr. 267. There is nothing in the case to exempt the defendant from the operation of the general rule.