Case law

Toothe v. Bryce

50 N.J. Eq. 589 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1892

Lord "Westbury in Suffield v. Brown (1864), 4 DeG., J. & S. 185, attacked and repudiated the doctrine of implied reservation asserted in Pyer v. … It is, however, inconsistent with the settled construction put upon the conveyances in use in England, and was thoroughly exploded, first by Lord Westbury in Suffield v. Brown, and later in the other cases above cited.

Domestic Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.

41 N.J. Eq. 241 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

Bird, V. C. … That he said this to the board of directors is established. One witness says that Mr.

Woulfe v. Associated Realties Corp.

130 N.J. Eq. 519 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 3, 1942

Woodruff, V. C. … Eq. 394; Lakatong Lodge, &c., v. Board of Education, &c., 84 N. J. Eq. 112; State v. Cleveland and P. R. Co., 94 Ohio State 61 ; 113 N. E. Rep. 677; L. R. *526 A. 1917 A 1007; Streuber, ex rel., v.

Gardner's Administrator v. Schooley

25 N.J. Eq. 150 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1874

They paid no board, *152 nor did they make any compensation for their washing, mending, &c., which were done by Sarah, there, but retained all their earnings for their own use. … Ridgway v. English, 2 Zab. 409; Updike v. Titus, 2 Beas. 151; Coley v. Coley, 1 McCart. 350; Updike v. Tenbrook, 3 Vroom 105 ; Prickett v. Prickett’s Adm’rs, 5 C. E. Green 478.

Woodstown National Bank, C., Co. v. Snelbaker

136 N.J. Eq. 62 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 1, 1944

My Executors and Trustees shall also be members of the Board of Managers." … See generally Hilliard v. Parker, 76 N.J. Eq. 447 ; 74 Atl. Rep. 447 ; Johnson v. Bowen, 85 N.J. Eq. 76 ; 95 Atl. Rep. 370 ; Bruce v. Bruce, 90 N.J. Eq. 573 ; 107 Atl. Rep. 434 ; Noice v. Schnell, 101 N.J.

Bowlby v. Bowlby

25 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1874

He was attending lectures as a student of medicine, and boarding in the family of a widow, who had adopted the defendant when an orphan of five or six years. … In Cornish v. Cornish, 8 *410 C. E.

Van Horne v. Newark Passenger Railway Co.

48 N.J. Eq. 332 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1891

Hinchman v. Paterson Horse R. R. Co., supra; Jersey City and Bergen R. R. Co. v. Hoboken R. R. Co., 5 C. E. Gr. 61; Paterson and Passaic Horse R. R. Co. v. Paterson, 9 C. E. Gr. 158; State v. … Chancellor Runyon said: “ It is enough to say on that head, that it does not appear that the road board had any power to authorize any one to set up poles on -the land of the highway and thus subject the land to an additional

Trenton Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Sibbits

62 N.J. Eq. 131 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 3, 1901

Strong v. Smith, 84 Mich. 567 . … In Brown v. Hammond, Johns. Ch. 210, the same question arose before Vice-Chancellor Wood, who, alluding to the case of Olney v.

Allen v. Francisco Sugar Co.

92 N.J. Eq. 391 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 5, 1920

Kean v. Johnson, 9 N. J. Eq. 401; Black v. Delaware and Raritan Canal Co., 24 N. J. Eq. 455; Mills v. Central Railroad Co., 41 N. J. Eq. 1; Colgate v. United States Leather Co., 75 N. J. Eq. 229; Riker v. … Brooks v. Cooper, 50 N. J. Eq. 761; Driver v. Smith, 89 N. J. Eq. 339.

Christian v. Canfield

108 N.J. Eq. 547 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 30, 1931

By this transfer the decedent was left with property of a face value of $6,421.81, about half of which was of doubtful value, and which produced an income of only $439 per annum, while her fixed expenses for board and lodging … Eq. 743 , 748 ; Pearce v. Stines ( V.C. Stevens ), 79 N.J. Eq. 51 , 55 ; Hunt v. Naylor ( V.C. Backes ), 84 N.J. Eq. 646 , 651 ; Smith v. Schopper ( V.C. Griffin ), 86 N.J. Eq. 107 , 117 ; Vass v.

Fass v. Wallwork

96 N.J. Eq. 541 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 30, 1924

Seymour v. Lewis, 13 N.J. Eq. 439 ; Fetters v. Humphreys, supra; affirmed, supra; De Luze v. Bradbury, 25 N.J. Eq. 70 ; Denton v. Leddell, 23 N.J. Eq. 64 ; C.R.R. v. Valentine, 29 N.J. Law 561 . … See, also, Brakely v. Sharp, 9 N.J. Eq. 1 , and 10 N.J. Eq. 206 ; Stuyvesant v. Woodruff, supra; Taylor v. Wright, 76 N.J. Eq. 121 . In Stuyvesant v.

Phillips v. Hulsizer

20 N.J. Eq. 308 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1869

Clark v. Condit, 3 C. K. Green 358; De Camp v. Crane, 4 C. E. Green 166; Van Keuren v. McLaughlin, Ibid. 187. It is also laid down and approved by text writers of authority, as law. 4 Kent’s Com. 142; 2 Story's Eq. … This was clearly and strongly stated, in the opinion of this court, in Hogan v. Jaques, 4 C. E. Green, 128; DeCamp v. Crane, Ibid. 171.

Muller v. Thomann

104 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 25, 1929

In Brown v. Kerns, 6 Ohio N.P. 66 ( n.e. ), the wife abandoned her husband, married and lived with another. In Reel v. Elder, 62 Pa. … In Hall v.

Garrison v. Engle

15 N.J. Misc. 592 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 4, 1937

It is true that in non-navigable waters the case of Nixon v. … The permit above referred to was issued by the board of commerce ■ and navigation pursuant to chapter 123 of the 1914 laws of New Jersey.

Mount Holly, Lumberton, & Medford Turnpike Co. v. Ferree

17 N.J. Eq. 117 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1864

Fatman v. Lobach, 1 Duer 354 ; Leavitt v. Fisher, 4 Duer 1 ; Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. Kortright, 22 Wend. 348 ; Bank of Utica v. Smalley, 2 Cowen 770; Angell & Ames on Corp., § 354, 564. … Commercial Bank v. Kortright, 22 Wend. 348 ; Sargent v. Franklin Ins. Co., 8 Pick. 98 .

Grimm v. Franklin

102 N.J. Eq. 198 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 26, 1928

Weizezahl v. Huber, 39 N.J.L.J. 334 ; 6 Corp. Jur. 973; Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N.J. Eq. 451 ; Schomp v. Schenck, 40 N.J. Law 195 ; Porter v. Bergen, 54 N.J. Eq. 405 ; Kelley v. Schwinghammer, 78 N.J. Eq. 437 ; Raimondi v. … Soper v. Bilder, 87 N.J. Eq. 564 .

Barrett v. Perth Amboy Shipbuilding & Engineering Co.

73 N.J. Eq. 62 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 31, 1907

.” *64 This section was under consideration by the court of errors and appeals in the Empire State Trust Co. v. Trustees of Wm. F. Fisher & Co., 67 N. J. … The circumstances of the ease do not bring it within the principle upon which Vice-Chancellor Stevens sustained the mortgage in Regina Music Box Co. v. Otto & Sons, 65 N. J. Eq. (20 Dick.) 582.

Attorney-General ex rel. Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'n

90 N.J. Eq. 404 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 26, 1919

To the same general effect is Davis v. Coventry, 55 Kan. 557 ; Wolford v. Crystal Lake, 54 Minn. 440 ; Close v. Glenwood, 107 U. S. 467 . … Wallace v. Loomis, 97 U. S. 146 . The principles underlying the rule are adverted to in Lockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board and Paper Co., 74 N. J. Eq. 690.

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures

30 N.J. Eq. 145 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

This doctrine is fully supported by Cox v. Matthews, 1 Vent. 237. So in Brown v. Best, 1 Wils. … In Platt v.

Shoup v. Dowsey

134 N.J. Eq. 440 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 25, 1944

In Gibson v. … Rep. 683 ; Daly v. Watson, 118 N.J. Eq. 258 ; 178 Atl. Rep. 781 ; affirmed, 121 N.J. Eq. 250 ; 190 Atl. Rep. 323 ; Sun Building and Loan Association v. Rashkes, supra. See, also, Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N.J.