Case law

Endicott v. Mathis

9 N.J. Eq. 110 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1852

Williamson v. Caman, 1 Gill and Johns. R. 184. … argued upon notice to dissolve the injunction upon the bill of the complainant, and the answer of Eli Mathis, one of the defendants, in the presence of William Halsted, solicitor and counsel of the complainant, and Abraham Browning

Gorlin v. Cameo Theatres, Inc.

122 N.J. Eq. 175 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 7, 1937

The minutes of the board of directors of the Cameo Theatres, Incorporated, show that the company was indebted to its officers and directors, namely, Benjamin Gorlin and Benjamin Berkowitz, in the amounts hereinabove stated … Eq. 576 ; Hodge v. United States Steel Corp., 64 N.J. Eq. 111 ; Borough of Vineland v. Maretti, 93 N.J. Eq. 513 ; Kotler v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 113 N.J. Eq. 544 ; Johnson v.

Leigh v. Executors of Savidge

14 N.J. Eq. 124 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1861

See Ancaster v. Mayer, 1 Brown’s Ch. Cas. 466; Dyose v. Dyose, 1 P. W 305; Noel v. Noel, 12 Brice 213. … In Snyder v.

Umbach v. Umbach

82 N.J. Eq. 427 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 13, 1914

Emery, V. C. … Cropper v. Brown (Vice-Chancellor Garrison, 1909), 76 N. J. Eq. (6 Buch.) 406; Townshend v. Simon (Judge Depue, 1876), 38 N. J. Law (9 Vr.) 239 (at p. 243).

Soper v. Bilder

87 N.J. Eq. 564 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 19, 1917

Hassell v. VanHouten, 39 N. J. Eq. 105 (at p. 109); Wilson v. Seeber, 72 N. J. Eq. 523. From a consideration, however, .of Lynde v. Lynde, 64 N. J. Eq. (at p. 749); Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N. J. Eq. … (at p. 458); Crocheron v. Savage, 75 N. J. Eq. 598 ; Porter v. Bergen, 54 N. J. Eq. 405; Wagner v. Phillips, 78 N. J. Eq. 33; Johnston v. Reilly, 68 N. J. Eq.

Executors of Clement v. Bartlett

33 N.J. Eq. 43 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880

Co. v. Trustees &c. 5 Stew. … Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State Bank, 2 Stew. Eq. 268; Trustees for Support of Public Schools v. Trenton, 3 Stew. Eq. 683.

Ocumpaugh v. Linde & Griffith Co.

94 N.J. Eq. 602 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 21, 1923

The views expressed in the cases of the Agnew Company v. The Paterson Board of Education, 83 N. J. Eq. 49; affirmed, 83 N. J. Eq. 336-339, and the Mack Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens’ Construction Co., 85 N. J. … Chief-Justice Fuller, in Mueller v. Nugent, 184 U.

Glorsky v. Wexler

142 N.J. Eq. 55 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 20, 1948

Vide, De Groot v. McCotter, 19 N.J. Eq. 531 , 533 ; Wilson v. Bird, 28 N.J. Eq. 352 ; Bell v. Romaine, 30 N.J. Eq. 24 ; Security Trust, c., Co. v. New Jersey Paper Board, c., Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 603 , 607 ; 42 Atl. … Rep. 2d 331; affirming 72 N.Y.S. 2d 327 ; Hoover v. Sandifur, 171 Pac. Rep. 2d 1009; Samuels v. United Seamen's Service, 68 F. Supp. 461 ; Michael Tuck Foundation v. Hazelcorn, 65 N.Y.S. 2d 387 ; Jones v.

Solomon v. Amervoll Co.

13 N.J. Misc. 873 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 16, 1935

Board of Education, 83 N. J. Eq. 49; 89 Atl. Rep. 1046 ; Regina v. Otto, 65 N. J. Eq. 582; 56 Atl. Rep. 715 . It was held in Glauberman v. Bergenline, 108 N. J. Eq. 531; 155 Atl. … In Long v. Republic, 115 N. J. Eq. 212; 169 Atl.

Rockwell v. Morgan

13 N.J. Eq. 384 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1861

Curtis v. Curtis, 2 Brown’s Ch. R. 632; D’Arcy v. Blake, 2 Sch. & Lef. 390; 2 Daniel’s Ch. Pr. 1343. … Hays v. Doane, 3 Stockt. 84; Whitney v. Whitney, 5 Dana 327 .

Schumm v. Seymour

24 N.J. Eq. 143 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1873

Green 412, their only existence is as a board, and they can do no valid act except as a board, and such act must he by ordinance or resolution, or something equivalent thereto. … Bond v. Newark, 4 C. E. Green 385.

Beach v. Hudson River Land Co.

65 N.J. Eq. 426 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 31, 1903

Pitney, V. C. … It simply says that the amount of the board and mortgage is to be adjusted arad the fulfillment of 'the contract is to be completed according to the terms contaiaaed in said coaatract.

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Rowand

26 N.J. Eq. 389 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1875

Pennock v. Hoover, 5 Rawle 291 ; Brooks v. Lester, 36 Maryland 65 . … Freeman v. Schrœder, 43 Barb. 618 .

Frank & Dugan v. Herold

63 N.J. Eq. 443 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 11, 1902

Pitney, V. C. (orally, after hearing Mr. Blauvelt and Mr. Hughes). I do not care to hear you, Mr. Harding. … The law in New Jersey on that subject is found in the case of Noice v. Brown, 10 Vr. 569 , which I happen to think of at this moment.

Thornton v. Thornton

67 N.J. Eq. 499 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 26, 1904

Bergen, V. C. The petitioner charges his wife, the defendant, with the crime of adultery, committed with a man by the name of Willis, in Jersey City, on Sunday, March 13th, 1904. … Sterratt, a married■ woman with whom she was boarding), leaning upon the arm of these voluntary guardians, notwithstanding the fact that the street cars were convenient and ran within a short distance of her home, affording

Karoly v. Hungarian Reformed Church

83 N.J. Eq. 514 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 24, 1914

True Reformed Dutch Church of Paramus v. Iserman, 64 N. J. Law 506. The question of law on this point was decided in the case of Schilstra v. Van Den Heuvel, 82 N. J. … Citing American Primitive Society v. Pilling, 4 Zab. 653; True Reformed Church v. Iserman, 64 N. J. Law 506; Pullis v. Iserman, 71 N. J. Law 408; 24 Am. & Eng. Encycl.

Polhemus v. De Lisle

98 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 26, 1925

Eq. 129 ; Newbery v. Barkalow, 75 N.J. Eq. 128 ; Bowen v. Smith, 76 N.J. Eq. 456 ; Sanford v. Keer, 80 N.J. Eq. 240 ; Winslow v. Newcomb, 87 N.J. Eq. 480 ; Dettsloff v. Hockstetter, 96 N.J. Eq. 391 ; Laverack v. … (f) Carroll's boarding-house. (g) Gwinn's boarding-house. (h) O'Shea's apartment-house. (i) The erection of seven houses on Lakeview road and Monmouth drive in violation of the restrictions as to building lines.

Valentine v. Valentine

61 N.J. Eq. 400 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 29, 1901

The bill in this ease is modeled after that in Harrall v. Wallis, 10 Stew. Eq. 458; S. C., 12 Stew. Eq. 279. … Harral v. Harral, 12 Stew. Eq. 279, 285; Firth v. Firth, 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 137. In view of these well-settled rules the facts are to be viewed,, and they are not free from perplexing features.

In re the sale of lands of Leary

50 N.J. Eq. 383 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1892

The conduct of the guardian seems to have been perfectly fair, above-board and honest. The amount offered under the petition is only $200 more than the price which has been obtained by the guardian. … In the case of Morrisse v. Inglis, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 306, Mr.

Elliott v. Elliott

48 N.J. Eq. 231 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

Green, V. C. … Eberlie, jointly, bought out the furniture and good will of a boarding-house in Pine street, Philadelphia, for which he paid $850 and she $400; and since that time these parties have conducted the boarding-house as partners