Case law

Gregory v. Stillwell

6 N.J. Eq. 51 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 15, 1846

This brings the equity of the bill within the reach of Brown’s answer. Stillwell conveyed to Brown in August, 1843; and Brown swears that on the 1st of September, 1843, he sold and conveyed to S. S. … Gregory; and Brown denies that the complainant has been in possession since he, Brown, conveyed, as aforesaid, to S. S. Gregory. Brown further states, that when he sold to S. S.

Board of Missions & Church Extension of the Protestant Episcopal Church v. Hebble

95 N.J. Eq. 117 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 30, 1923

Read v. Huff, 80 N. J. Eq. 229. But here Hebble had the conveyance made to Quinn, and Quinn conveyed to Mrs. Hebble. No resulting trust arises under the latter deed. … . *119 Coffey v. Sullivan, 63 N. J. Eq. 296; Fretz v. Roth, 70 N. J. Eq. 764. The point was distinctly ruled in Lister v. Lister, 35 N. J. Eq. 49, 55, “Warwick street property.” The ease of Duvale v. Duvale, 54 N. J.

Sweeney v. Sweeney

62 N.J. Eq. 357 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 16, 1901

Coddington v. Coddington. 5 C. E. Gr. 263; Yates v. Yates, 2 Beas. 280; Brown v. Brown, 1 McCart. 78; McGean v. McGean, 15 Dick. Ch. Rep. 21; Tracy v. Tracy, 15 Dick. Ch. Rep. 25. … Brown v. Brown, 1 McCart. 78.

Morris & Essex Railroad v. State ex rel. State Board of Health

55 N.J. Eq. 591 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 15, 1897

Atlantic City Fire Insurance v. Board of Commissioners of Atlantic City

89 N.J. Eq. 48 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 13, 1918

Leaming, V. C. … New York and Greenwood Lake Railway Co. v. Township of Montclair, 47 N. J. Eq. 591; Barber v. W. J. Title Co., 53 N. J. Eq. 159; West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co. v. Mayor, &c., of Woodbury, 80 N. J. Eq. 412.

Board of Health & Vital Statistics v. New York Horse Manure Co.

47 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1890

The bill is founded upon the ninth section of the act'entitled “An act concerning county boards established for the protection of the public health and the registration of vital facts and statistics in counties of this state … Somewhat shorn of its verbiage, that section provides that a county board of health, in its own name, may maintain a bill in equity for the abatement of a nuisance, whether the nuisance be public or private, where the pleadings

North Jersey Street Railway Co. v. Board of Street & Water Commissioners

73 N.J. Eq. 106 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 1, 1907

Complainant mignt, by certiorari, apply to have the resolution of the board for the removal of the tracks vacated, as made without notice or hearing (Jersey City, &c., Railway Co. v. Passaic, 68 N. J. … Law (39 Vr.) 110 (Supreme Court, 1992), but, as the decision of the board, if made after notice and hearing, would not, under the decision in Hutton v.

West Bergen Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

127 N.J. Eq. 228 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 16, 1940

Stinson v. Board of Supervisors, 153 Va. 362 ; 149 S. E. Rep. 531 ." In State v. Edwards, 89 S. C. 224; 71 S. E. … Rep. 342; Board of Education v. Roder, 42 W. Va. 178 ; 24 S. E. Rep. 680 ; Milwaukee County v. Pabst, 70 Wis. 352 ; 35 N. W. Rep. 337 .

Freytag v. Hoeland

23 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1872

Freytag explained it to Brown, and told Brown that he should make out the deed — that it was all right.” Mr. … Brown knew it was a deed given as security, and both Hoeland and Wood, Brown’s clerk, who drew the deed, say that Brown cautioned Freytag against giving an absolute deed to Hoeland, unless lie had perfect confidence in him

New Jersey & New England Telegraph Co. v. Board of Fire Commissioners

34 N.J. Eq. 117 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

Van Fleet, V. C. The complainants are the owners of a line of electric telegraph, extending from the city of New York to the city of Philadelphia. … It was not reported to the board, nor to any com *119 mittee of the board, but the superintendent reported it to two members of the board—first to the president of the board, who directed him to report it to Commissioner

Bergen Savings Bank v. Barrows

30 N.J. Eq. 89 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

By the new bond and the collateral mortgages, the Brown mortgage was satisfied pro tanto ’ as against the holder of a subsequent encumbrance on the property. Bolles v. Wade, 3 Gr. Ch. 458. … Hoy v. Bramhall, 4 C. E. Gr. 563.

Danforth v. Moore

55 N.J. Eq. 127 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1896

Leigh v. Dickeson, 15 Q. B. Div. 60, 67; Farrington v. Forrester, 2 Ch. Div. 461, 478 (1893); Freem. Co-ten. & P. ¶¶ 261, 262. … The former course was followed in Hall v. Piddock, 6 C. E. Gr. 311; Doughaday v. Crowell, 3 Stock. 201 ; Brookfield v. Williams, 1 Gr. Ch. 341; Obert v. Obert, 1 Hal. Ch. 397. Lord-Justice Cotton, in Leigh v.

Gloucester Township v. Castor

142 N.J. Eq. 52 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 6, 1948

Schuster v. Kurzius, 112 N.J. Eq. 466 ; 164 Atl. Rep. 687 ; Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Camp, 124 N.J. Eq. 403 ; 1 Atl. Rep. 2d 425. … Cf., Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Camp, supra , and Parker v. Child, 25 N.J. Eq. 41 .

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. President of the State Bank

32 N.J. Eq. 467 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1880

Gold Bank v. McDonald, 51 Cal. 64 . And it discharged its whole duty in the collection. It did not wait till the next day, but for *469 warded the draft on the same day on which it was received.

Board of Trustees of Schools for Industrial Education v. Mayor of Hoboken

70 N.J. Eq. 630 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 8, 1905

Brown v. Pancoast, 34 N. J. Eq. (7 Stew.) 321 (Chancellor Runyon, 1881); George v. Braddock, 45 N. J. Eq. (18 Stew.) 757 (Court of Errors and Appeals). As have schools. Stevens v. Shippen, 28 N. J. … Eq. (1 Stew.) 487; Green v. Blackwell, 35 Atl. Rep. 375 ; Hyde’s Executors v. Hyde, 64 N. J. Eq. (19 Dick.) 9.

Cook v. Cook

32 N.J. Eq. 475 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1880

Boardman v. Boardman, L. R. (1 P. D.) 233; Brown v. Brown, Id. 46; Bish. on Marr. & Div. § 735; C____v. C____, 28 E. L. & E. 603. … Brown v. Brown, ubi supra. “ I hardly think it necessary,” says Dr. Lushington, in Ciocci v. Ciocci, 26 E.

Passaic-Athenia Bus Co. v. Consolidated, C.

100 N.J. Eq. 188 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 26, 1926

The chancellor has discussed an instance in Brown v. Brown, 96 N.J. Eq. 428 . … In the later case of Brown v. Brown, supra , the chancellor has again brought this matter of practice to the attention of the bar.

Van Nostrand v. Board of Domestic Missions of the Reformed Church in America

59 N.J. Eq. 19 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 23, 1899

Reed, V. C. A gift to a corporation by a misnomer is good, especially if for a charitable purpose. 2 Perry Trusts 730. In Wilson v. … Wills 10; Duke of Leeds v. Amherst, 9 Jur. 359; Re Fethans Trusts, 1 Kay & J. 528.

Douglass v. Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church of America

110 N.J. Eq. 331 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 14, 1932

In Den v. Crawford, 8 N. J. … In the third clause he bequeaths $10,000 each to the foreign and. home missionary boards of that organization.

Hood v. Francis

137 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1945

Where the power is general, the donee of the power may appoint to various persons in varying amounts ( Brown v. … And in Board of Home Missions, c. , v. Saltmer, 125 N.J. Eq. 33 , 36 ; 4 Atl.