Case law

McIlroy v. N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co.

126 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 11, 1939

The law is similarly well settled in other states: In re International Milling Co., 259 N.Y. 77 ; Van Alen v. American National Bank, 52 N.Y. 1 ; Brown v. Spohr, 180 N.Y. 201 , 212 ; Central National Bank v. … In Prudden Co. v.

Van Buren v. Fine

101 N.J. Eq. 373 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 5, 1927

In Herrington v. … PHILLIPS BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff."

Friel v. Turk

95 N.J. Eq. 425 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1924

Poster, V. C. … The McKelway Case has been reviewed in Haggerty v. McCanna, 25 N. J. Eq. 48; Dillett v. Kemble, 25 N. J. Eq. 66; Camden, &c., Land Co. v. Mason, 91 N. J. Eq. 25, and Magnolia Contraction Co. v. McQuillan, 94 N. J.

Laroe v. Douglass

13 N.J. Eq. 308 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1861

In the spring of 1850, the farm was sold and conveyed by Alexander Davis to Brown and Bigelow. … Bellerjeau v. Executors of Kotts, 1 South. 359 .

Van Doren v. Robinson

16 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1863

In McKibbin v. Brown, 1 McCarter 13, the bill was filed by the lessee to enforce the specific performance of a covenant for renewal. … Gaskarth v. Lord Lowther, 12 Ves. 107; Wilks v. Davis, 3 Mer. 507; City of Providence v. St. John’s Lodge, 2 Rhode Island R. 46; Dike v. Greene, 4 Rhode Island R. 285; Fry on Spec. Perf., § 219.

Miller v. Chetwood

2 N.J. Eq. 199 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1839

The authorities on this subject will be found in a note to the case of Rich v. Jackson, in 4 Brown's C. C. 519. … See Veeder v. Fonda, 3 Paige, 97 ; King v. Morford and others, Saxton, 274; Rodman v. Zilley and others, Saxton, 321. In the case of King v.

Moorestown Trust Co. v. Buzby

109 N.J. Eq. 409 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1931

King v. Berry, 3 N.J. Eq. 44 , 54 ; Executors of Luse v. Parke, 17 N.J. Eq. 415 ; Kamena v. Huelbig, 23 N.J. Eq. 78 ; Terney v. Wilson, 45 N.J. Law 282 ; Board of Education, c., of Long Branch v. Duparquet, 50 N.J. … Eq. 234 ; Miller v. Town of Stockton, 64 N.J. Law 614 ; Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co., 69 N.J. Eq. 809 ; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. City of Newark, 76 N.J. Eq. 230 , 234 .

Hague v. Hague

84 N.J. Eq. 674 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 23, 1915

Foote v. Foote, 61 Atl. Rep. 90 ; 14 Cyc. 611. Failure to support is not. In Palmer v. Palmer, 22 N. J. … This fact does not bring the ease within the doctrine of Alward v. Alward, 65 N. J. Eq. 28; Foote v. Foote, 71 N. J. Eq. 273; Thomas v. Thomas, 74 Atl.

Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. Muth

91 N.J. Eq. 460 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1920

Fielder, V. C. … Tepper v. Royal Arcanum, 61 N. J. Eq. 638, 644; Catholic Benevolent Legion v. Murphy, 65 N. J. Eq. 60, 90; Wolfstern v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 76 N. J. Eq. 78, 87; Royal Arcanum v. Alexander, 86 N. J. Eq. 443, 445.

Hess v. Kenney

69 N.J. Eq. 138 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 10, 1905

Pitney, V. 0. The complainant, Mrs. … The reasoning of Lord Westbury, in Suffield v. Brown, 4 De G. J. & S. 185; 33 L. J. Ch. 249; 10 Jur. (N. S.) 111, seems to me unanswerable, and was adopted in the later English cases.

Canadian Improvement Co. v. Lea

74 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 12, 1908

Garrison, V. C. The Lake Superior Corporation is the successor of a previous corporation termed the Consolidated Lake Superior Company. It is the owner of a large plant at Sault Ste. Marie. … It is not pretended by anyone that the company itself, by the formal action of its board of directors, ever either authorized the contract or ratified it. When Mr. Clergue and Mr.

Coe v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co.

27 N.J. Eq. 110 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1876

In Paine v. … In view of the resolutions of the board of directors of the railroad company on the subject, and of the testimony generally, none of the payments in question can be held to have been merely voluntary and made solely on the

El Mora Super Service, C., Inc. v. Byrnes

117 N.J. Eq. 342 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 21, 1934

Windholz Son v. Burke, 98 N.J. Eq. 471 ; Lincoln Furniture Co. v. Bornstein, 100 N.J. Eq. 78 ; Sparks v. Lorentowicz, 106 N.J. Eq. 178 . … Grigg v. Landis, 21 N.J. Eq. 494 .

Soper v. Bilder

87 N.J. Eq. 564 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 19, 1917

Hassell v. VanHouten, 39 N. J. Eq. 105 (at p. 109); Wilson v. Seeber, 72 N. J. Eq. 523. From a consideration, however, .of Lynde v. Lynde, 64 N. J. Eq. (at p. 749); Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N. J. Eq. … (at p. 458); Crocheron v. Savage, 75 N. J. Eq. 598 ; Porter v. Bergen, 54 N. J. Eq. 405; Wagner v. Phillips, 78 N. J. Eq. 33; Johnston v. Reilly, 68 N. J. Eq.

Shaw v. Standard Piano Co.

86 N.J. Eq. 137 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 1, 1916

Foster, V. … Patterson acquired this knowledge while acting as a member of the board of directors of the bank convened in its official capacity (First National Bank v. Christopher, 40 N. J.

Booraem v. North Hudson County Railway Co.

39 N.J. Eq. 465 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1885

They are now in their natural condition, being wholly unimproved, except enclosing them by a high board fence should be regarded as an improvement. … Methodist Church v. Hoboken, 4 Vr. 13 .

Canter, C. v. Retail Furniture, C., No. 109

122 N.J. Eq. 575 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 17, 1937

*Page 588 But the supreme court in construing article 9 (a) of the act, in National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 ; 57 Sup. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Co., supra. The citizens of this state have the right to petition the legislature and ask that the public policy of the state be changed.

Anshutz v. Anshutz

16 N.J. Eq. 162 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1863

Such was clearly the view of the master in Miller v. Miller, Saxton 386. In Yule v. … And in Corey v.

Meeker v. Felts

49 N.J. Eq. 502 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1892

In Garretson v. Brown, 2 Dutch. 425 (at p. 438), Mr. … In Hays v.

Blackwood Improvement Co. v. Public Service Corp.

91 N.J. Eq. 220 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 17, 1919

Backes, V. C. The complainant owns a large tract of land near the village of Blackwood, Gloucester county, which it acquired from the devisee of the late J. Willard Morgan. … Horner v. Stillwell, 35 N. J. Law 307, Shields v. Arndt, 4 N. J. Eq. 234; Raritan Water Power Co. v. Veghte, 21 N. J. Eq. 463; Dill v. Board of Education, 47 N. J. Eq. 421.