Case law

Smith v. Smith

33 N.J. Eq. 458 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881

Lushington, in Dysart v. Dysart, 1 Rob. … Cockburn expresses it in Banks v. Goodfellow, L. R. (5 Q.

Crowther v. Micucci

122 N.J. Eq. 81 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 9, 1937

Sanderson v. Howell, 14 N.J. Mis. R. 61; 182 Atl. Rep. 158 . In Madison Trust Co. v. Allen, 105 N.J. … In Christian v.

Maxwell v. Maxwell

122 N.J. Eq. 247 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1937

Brown v. Mugway, 15 N.J. Law 330 ; Tzeses v. Tenez Construction Co., 95 N.J. Eq. 145 ; affirmed, 97 N.J. Eq. 501 . … See, also, Bruce v. Bruce, supra; Nevius v. Martin, 30 N.J. Law 465 , 471 ; Griscom v. Evens, 40 N.J. Law 402 , 407 ; affirmed, 42 N.J. Law, 579 ; Leigh v. Executors of Savidge, 14 N.J. Eq. 124 , 130 ; Burnet's Ex'rs v.

In re the Taxation of Electro-Pneumatic Transit Co.

51 N.J. Eq. 71 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

Bird, V. C. … State Board of Assessors, 26 Vr. 55 — is directly in conflict with them.

Turner v. Gibb

48 N.J. Eq. 526 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1891

Stevens v. Flower, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 340; Merritt v. Merritt, 3 Dick. Ch. Rep. 1. This is practically the English rule as stated in Hawkins, supra, and declared in the case of Greville v. Browne, 7 H. L. Cas. 689. … Bench v. Biles, 4 Madd. 187; Francis v. Clemow, Kay 435; Wheeler v. Howell, 3 Kay & J. 198; Miller v. Sandford, 4 Stew. Eq. 427; Lewis v. Darling, 16 How. (U. S.) 1; Hassanclever v. Tucker, 2 Binn. 525 ; Moore v.

Starkey v. Fox

52 N.J. Eq. 758 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1894

Jur. § 1520 &c.; Bright v. Legerton, 2 De G., F. & J. 606; Dean v. Dean, 1 Stock. 425 ; Kane v. Bloodgood, 7 Johns. Ch. 90 ; McDonnel v. White, 11 H. L. Cas. 570; Prevost v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 481 ; Philippi v. … S. 151 ; Pattison v. Hawkesworth, 10 Beav. 375; Baker v. Whiting, 3 Sumn. 486 ; S. C., 2 Fed. Cas. 787 ; Browne v. Cross, 14 Beav. 105; Harcourt v. White, 28 Beav. 303.

Pols v. the Strand of Atlantic City, Inc.

136 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 3, 1944

Brown v. Royal Battery Corp., 131 N.J. Eq. 345 ; 25 Atl. Rep. 2d 203. … The court, in O'Connor v. Meskill, 39 Atl.

In re Newark Savings Institution

28 N.J. Eq. 552 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1877

sums and at such times and on such terms as the by-laws shall prescribe, which shall be invested accordingly, and shall be repaid to such depositors at such times, and with such interest, and under such regulations as the board … Coite v. Society for Savings, 32 Conn. 173 ; *555 Bunnell v. Collinsville Savings Society, 38 Conn. 203 . It has no stock.

Wilentz v. Crown Laundry Service, Inc.

116 N.J. Eq. 40 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 27, 1934

Last November a number of men, of whom several composed the board of directors of the New Jersey Laundry *Page 41 Owners Association and the others, though not members of the association, were engaged in the laundry business … Tyson and Brother v. Banton, 273 U.S. 418 ; 47 Sup. Ct. 426 ; Ribnick v. McBride, 277 U.S. 350 ; 48 Sup. Ct. 545 ; Williams v. Standard Oil Co., 278 U.S. 235 ; 49 Sup. Ct. 115 .

Renner v. Renner

13 N.J. Misc. 749 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 6, 1935

In Wallace v. Wallace, 65 N. J. … And again, in Brown v. Brown, 112 N. J. Eq. 600; 165 Atl.

McIlroy v. N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co.

126 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 11, 1939

The law is similarly well settled in other states: In re International Milling Co., 259 N.Y. 77 ; Van Alen v. American National Bank, 52 N.Y. 1 ; Brown v. Spohr, 180 N.Y. 201 , 212 ; Central National Bank v. … In Prudden Co. v.

Van Buren v. Fine

101 N.J. Eq. 373 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 5, 1927

In Herrington v. … PHILLIPS BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff."

Milne v. Kleb

44 N.J. Eq. 378 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Justice Van Syckel, in Long v. … In Hamer v. Sharp, L.

Friel v. Turk

95 N.J. Eq. 425 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1924

Poster, V. C. … The McKelway Case has been reviewed in Haggerty v. McCanna, 25 N. J. Eq. 48; Dillett v. Kemble, 25 N. J. Eq. 66; Camden, &c., Land Co. v. Mason, 91 N. J. Eq. 25, and Magnolia Contraction Co. v. McQuillan, 94 N. J.

Laroe v. Douglass

13 N.J. Eq. 308 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1861

In the spring of 1850, the farm was sold and conveyed by Alexander Davis to Brown and Bigelow. … Bellerjeau v. Executors of Kotts, 1 South. 359 .

Van Doren v. Robinson

16 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1863

In McKibbin v. Brown, 1 McCarter 13, the bill was filed by the lessee to enforce the specific performance of a covenant for renewal. … Gaskarth v. Lord Lowther, 12 Ves. 107; Wilks v. Davis, 3 Mer. 507; City of Providence v. St. John’s Lodge, 2 Rhode Island R. 46; Dike v. Greene, 4 Rhode Island R. 285; Fry on Spec. Perf., § 219.

Miller v. Chetwood

2 N.J. Eq. 199 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1839

The authorities on this subject will be found in a note to the case of Rich v. Jackson, in 4 Brown's C. C. 519. … See Veeder v. Fonda, 3 Paige, 97 ; King v. Morford and others, Saxton, 274; Rodman v. Zilley and others, Saxton, 321. In the case of King v.

Moorestown Trust Co. v. Buzby

109 N.J. Eq. 409 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1931

King v. Berry, 3 N.J. Eq. 44 , 54 ; Executors of Luse v. Parke, 17 N.J. Eq. 415 ; Kamena v. Huelbig, 23 N.J. Eq. 78 ; Terney v. Wilson, 45 N.J. Law 282 ; Board of Education, c., of Long Branch v. Duparquet, 50 N.J. … Eq. 234 ; Miller v. Town of Stockton, 64 N.J. Law 614 ; Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co., 69 N.J. Eq. 809 ; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. City of Newark, 76 N.J. Eq. 230 , 234 .

Hague v. Hague

84 N.J. Eq. 674 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 23, 1915

Foote v. Foote, 61 Atl. Rep. 90 ; 14 Cyc. 611. Failure to support is not. In Palmer v. Palmer, 22 N. J. … This fact does not bring the ease within the doctrine of Alward v. Alward, 65 N. J. Eq. 28; Foote v. Foote, 71 N. J. Eq. 273; Thomas v. Thomas, 74 Atl.

Zaveski v. Kish

138 N.J. Eq. 61 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 26, 1946

The complainants were well known to the "case worker" of the Hamilton Township Welfare Board. In 1941 the complainants *Page 63 were in dire need of financial aid. … See Mott v. Mott, 49 N.J. Eq. 192 ; 22 Atl. Rep. 997 ; White v. White, 60 N.J. Eq. 104 , 115 ; 45 Atl. Rep. 767 ; Collins v. Collins, 63 N.J. Eq. 602 ; 52 Atl. Rep. 1115 ; Matthews v. Craven, 124 N.J. Eq. 455 ; 2 Atl.