Case law

Cox v. Camden Safe Deposit Trust Co.

124 N.J. Eq. 490 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1938

In the case of Gates v. Plainfield Trust Co., 121 N.J. Eq. 460 ; affirmed, 122 N.J. … Springfield National Bank v. Couse, 288 Mass. 262 ; 192 N.E. Rep. 529 ; 94 A.L.R. 1460 ; First National Bank of Boston v. Truesdale Hospital, 288 Mass. 35 ; 192 N.E. Rep. 150 ; Am. Law Inst.

Copper King v. Robert

76 N.J. Eq. 251 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 13, 1909

But, the petitioner further urges that, irrespective of ,the statute, this court has the inherent power to direct the complainant to give her an inspection of its books, and cites Lawless v. Fleming, 56 N. J. … The minute book will show whether or not the suit was authorized to be brought by action of the board of directors, and the defendant is entitled to an inspection of that book.

Woodruff v. Mutschler

34 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

Pickle, 89 Qratt. 37; Harrison v. Harrison, 1 Call 419 ; Grattan v. Wiggins, 83 Oal. 16; Copper v. Wells, Sax. 10; Demarest v. Wynkoop, 3 Johns. Ch. 145 ; Pierce v. Brown, 34 Vt. 165 ; Clerkson v. … Bowyer, 8 Vern. 66; Gibson v. Bailey, 9 N. H. 168 ;■ Johnson v. Bartlett, 17 Pick. 477 ; Sheldon v. Smith, 97 ilfass. 34; Merrin v. Lewis, 90 111. 505; Griffin v. Lovell, 4' 3 Miss. 403 ; Fifield v. Sperry, 80 JV.

Nibert v. Baghurst

47 N.J. Eq. 201 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1890

Green, V. C. … Co. v. Stewart, 3 C. E. Gr. 489; Cole v. White, cited 1 Bro. Ch. 409; Jervis v. Smith, Hoffm. Ch. 470; Story Eq. Jur. § 768; Lord v. Underdunck, 1 Sandf. Ch. 46; 2 White & T. Lead. Cas. 887; Brown St. of F. % 483.

Hayes' Executors v. Hayes

21 N.J. Eq. 265 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1871

In Campbell v. … In Kennell v.

Auburn Button Wks. v. Perryman Elec. Co.

107 N.J. Eq. 554 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 11, 1931

Naspo v. Summit Sweet Shoppe, Inc., 106 N.J. Eq. 49 ; Liss v. Security Finance Co. (not officially reported — docket 76, page 677); Pierce v. Old Dominion, c., Smelting Co., 67 N.J. Eq. 399 ; Rawnsley v. … The *Page 558 court is without authority to substitute its judgment for the judgment of the board of directors when they act within the law.

Township of Belleville v. City of Orange

70 N.J. Eq. 244 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 13, 1905

Emery, V. 0. The city of Orange, by the act of April 7th, 1890, entitled “An act to provide for drainage and sewerage in cities of this state” (1 Gen. … Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 45 N. J. Eq. (18 Stew.) 393, 401 (Chancellor McGill, 1899).

Van Houten v. Van Winkle

46 N.J. Eq. 380 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890

Emans v. Wortman, 2 Beas. 205; Crane v. Fairchild, 1 McCart. 76; Story Eq. Pl. § 271. … Doughty v. Doughty, 2 Stock. 347 ; Hance v. Conover, 4 Stew. Eq. 505; Brown v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., 5 Stew. Eq. 809; Wilkinson v. Sherman, 18 Stew. Eq. 413; Lynch’s Adm’s v. Vanneman, 18 Atl.

Wirtz v. Guthrie

81 N.J. Eq. 271 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 17, 1913

In Gillespie v. … Wallace v. Brown (Chancellor Williamson, 1855), 1.0 N. J. Eq. (2 Stock.) 308, 312; Ryno v. Darby (Chancellor Zabriskie, 1869), 20 N. J. Eq. (5 C. E. Gr.) 231.

State Council of the Order of United American Mechanics v. Sharp

38 N.J. Eq. 24 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

Van Houten v. Pine, 9 Stew. Eq. 133; Fraas v. Barlement, 10 C. E. Gr. 84; Altmann v. Benz, 12 C. E. Gr. 331. … The constitution of the state council provides that these funds shall, on dissolution of the subordinate council, be paid over to the former, to be appropriated, by a board of trustees organized for that purpose, to the assistance

Green v. Green

134 N.J. Eq. 479 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 26, 1944

In Brearley v. Molten, supra , the court pointed out that the whole estate, pending sale, was one fund in the hands of the executrix, and that it was her duty to pay taxes out of income. In Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J. … The court in each instance distinguished the case before it from such cases as Outcalt v. Appleby and Martin v. Kimball.

Tiffany v. Crawford

14 N.J. Eq. 278 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

Brown. It is admitted that, on the tenth of June, 1858, $501.70 were paid on account of the mortgage debt. The bill claims that the balance of the debt is due to the complainant. … On this point see Hayes v. Ward, 4 Johns. Ch. R. 123.

Newark Ladder, C. v. Furniture Workers, C.

125 N.J. Eq. 99 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 9, 1939

Before the return day, the parties were gathered in conference by the Newark Labor Relations Board, and a settlement was apparently reached December 9th. … Law 274 , 282 ; Ross v. Pennsylvania *Page 103 Railroad, 106 N.J. Law 536 ; Havey v. Hofmann, 121 N.J. Eq. 523 ; 123 N.J. Eq. 589 ; Whitfield v. Kern, 122 N.J. Eq. 332 ; Rippel v. Kaplus, 124 N.J. Eq. 303 .

Bridgewater v. Ocean City Ass'n

85 N.J. Eq. 379 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 15, 1915

Losey v. Simpson, 11 N. J. Eq. 246; Leonard v. Leonia Heights Land Co., 81 N. J. Eq. 489; Kitteridge v. Chapman, 36 Iowa 348 ; Rush v. Mitchell, 71 Iowa 333 ; Baldwin v. Sager, 70 Ill. 503 . … The boarding-house was moved by Matthews to the lots in 189?, or thereabouts, and enlarged by Mrs. Buchanan some ten years later at an outlay of upwards of $3,500.

President of the Somerset County Bank v. Veghte

42 N.J. Eq. 39 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1886

Kane v. Bloodgood, 7 Johns. Ch. 90 ; Ang. on him. § 178. The complainants’ counsel insist that in the case of Williams v. Reilly, 14, Stew. … It was held in Williams v. McKay, 13 Stew.

In Re Daniecki

117 N.J. Eq. 527 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1935

In Richardson v. State Board of Control of Institutions and Agencies, 98 N.J. Law 690 , Mrs. … See, also, State v. Rodgers, 90 N.J. Law 60 ; reversed, 91 N.J. Law 212 ; State v. Firth, 103 N.J. Law 275 ; State v. Gratz, 86 N.J. Law 483 ; Geiger v. Recorder's Court of Town of Irvington, 96 Atl. Rep. 1006 .

Lyons v. Van Riper

26 N.J. Eq. 337 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1875

Sloan v. … Day v. Day, 2 Green’s Ch. 549 ; Finchman v. Edwards, 3 Curteis 63 ; Redfield on Wills 57, § 7. In this case the proof is conclusive the testatrix fully understood the contents of the will when she executed it.

The Riverton Country Club v. Thomas

141 N.J. Eq. 435 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1948

of Education v. … See, also, Board of Education of West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N.J. Eq. 57 ; 106 Atl. Rep. 32 ; Carpender v. City of New Brunswick, 135 N.J. Eq. 397 ; 39 Atl. Rep. 2d 40; Ninth Street Pier Co. v.

Hellman v. Pennsylvania Electric Vehicle Co.

73 N.J. Eq. 269 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 17, 1907

Lemming, V. C. The affairs of defendant corporation are being settled by its board of directors, as statutory trustees, under proceedings of voluntary dissolution. … expenses as aforesaid, and the preferred stockholders, may be divided and paid to the general stockholders proportionately, according to their respective shares.” *272 In the year 1880, Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, in McGregor v.

Jones v. Watford

62 N.J. Eq. 339 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 2, 1901

He directed that the school should bo conducted on the plan “which I have, from time to time, described to most of the board of trustees herein named, and who shall approve of final practical plans in keeping therewith.” … *343 The court of appeals, in Thomson's Executors v. Norris, 5 C. E.