Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.92s

  • Internat'nal, C., Paterson v. Internat'nal, C.

    113 N.J. Eq. 585 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 28, 1933

    would seem that the power to merge locals resides in the international office, a body of twenty-one members, composed of the international president, secretary and treasurer, eight members of the international executive board … that suit is to be deemed to have been upon the merits, it is conceivable that the judgment upon the issues against the voluntary body inures to Local 52 under the second subdivision of the rule of res adjudicata in Nagel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Duttkin v. Zalenski

    140 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1947

    Cooley v. Brown, 30 Iowa 470 , 473 . Fourthly, although the factual circumstances did not invoke such a ruling, the dictum noticeable in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey in Schwalber v. Ehman ( 1901 ), 62 N.J. … Pursel v. Pursel, 14 N.J. Eq. 514 ; Vreeland v. Vreeland's Adm'r, supra; First National Bank v. Thompson, 61 N.J. Eq. 188 ; 48 Atl. Rep. 333 ; Wheedon v. Nichols, 72 N.J. Eq. 366 ; 65 Atl.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lovett v. Taylor

    54 N.J. Eq. 311 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

    Brown Stat. F. §§ 95, 499 and cases cited; 3 Reed Stat. F. § 899; Montacute v. Maxwell, 1 P. … And the supreme court of Illinois, in Williams v. Brown, 14 Ill. 200 , said tersely: “ Ho contract between parties can make a resulting trust.” And Chancellor Williamson, *318 in Baldwin v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Day v. Palisade B. L. Assn.

    124 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 15, 1937

    The defendant's board of directors, on September 30th, 1937, adopted a plan of reorganization under the provisions of chapter 55 of the laws of 1937. … Newark Twenty-one Building and Loan Association v. Zukerberg, 115 N.J. Eq. 579 ; Thirteenth Ward Building and Loan Association v. Weissberg, Ibid. 487.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rittenhouse v. Rittenhouse

    29 N.J. Eq. 274 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

    Cornish v. Cornish, 8 C. E. Gr. 208; Bowlby v. Bowlby, 10 C. E. Gr. 406, 570. … Instead.of so doing, the petitioner, on the next day, caused an advertisement to be published in a newspaper, that the defendant had left his bed and board of her own. free will, and warning the public against trusting her

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Camp v. Whitman

    51 N.J. Eq. 467 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1893

    In Gayford v. Moffat, 4 L. R. Ch. App. 133 (1868), the question arose as to the character and extent of a right of way of necessity granted by implication with a lease. … Saund. *323; also, Suffield v. Brown, 4 De G., J. & S. 185, and other cases cited in Tooth v. Bryce, 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 589. Denne v. Light, 3 Jur. (N. S.) 627, 26 L. J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Beck v. Dennis

    128 N.J. Eq. 128 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 30, 1940

    Scudder v. Vanarsdale, 13 N.J. Eq. 109 , 133 ; Fluke v. Fluke, 16 N.J. Eq. 478 , 480 ; Cook v. Cook, 20 N.J. Eq. 375 , 377 ; Hand v. Marcy, 28 N.J. Eq. 59 , 65 ; Clark v. Denton, 36 N.J. Eq. 419 ; Brown v. … Eq. 186 ; Fluke v. Fluke, supra; Todd v. Wortman, 45 N.J. Eq. 723 , 725 ; Morse v. Hackensack Savings Bank, 47 N.J. Eq. 279 ; Bonnell v. Bonnell, 47 N.J. Eq. 540 , 544 ; Moores v. Moores, 41 N.J. Law 440 ; Hopping v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vreeland v. New Jersey Stone Co.

    25 N.J. Eq. 140 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1874

    Pl., § 605; Hogencamp v. Ackerman, 2 Stockt. 267; Brown v. Fuller, 2 Beas. 271. This rule is strictly adhered to in cases of fraud, llech. Bank v. Levy, 1 Edw. 316 ; Scull v. Reeves, 2 Green’s Ch. 84; Smith v. … Mervin v. Smith, 1 Green’s Ch. 182; Scull v. Reeves, 2 Green’s Ch. 84; Everly v. Rice, 3 Green’s Ch. 553; Teasey v. Baker, 4 C. E. Green 61.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dey v. Dey's Administrator

    19 N.J. Eq. 137 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1868

    Hassel v. Hassel, 2 Dick. 527; Newman v. Johnson, 1 Vern. 45; Trott v. Vernon, 2 Vern. 708; Cole v. Turner, 4 Russ. 376; Mirehouse v. Scaife, 2 Mylne & Cr. 695; Bench v. Biles, 4 Madd. 187; Brudenell v. … Davis v. Gardiner, 1 P. W. 187; Keeling v. Brown, 5 Ves. 358. Chancellor Kent, in Lupton v. Lupton, 2 Johns. C. R. 614, held that such devise did not charge legacies upon real estate. In Rafferty v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 102 v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 52

    113 N.J. Eq. 585 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 28, 1933

    Backes, V. C. … would seem that the power to merge locals resides in the international office, a body of twenty-one members, composed of the international president, secretary and treasurer, eight members of the international executive board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Ice Machine Co. v. Paterson Steam Fire Engine & Machine Co.

    22 N.J. Eq. 72 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1871

    It was to be finished perfect in all its parts, and to be put up in working order ready for trial in six weeks, and after trial, to be properly boxed and packed for shipment, and placed on board the cars, for the sum. of … Bowen v. Lease, 5 Hill 221 ; Harris v. Thompson, 15 Barb. 62 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dintenfass v. Willat Film Corp.

    108 N.J. Eq. 195 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 21, 1931

    Camden and Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Mays Landing, c., Railroad Co., 48 N.J. Law 530 ; Jersey City v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 72 *Page 199 N.J. Law 383; Board of Education of Millville v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fitzgerald v. State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n

    76 N.J. Eq. 137 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 9, 1909

    Miers v. Columbia Mut. B. & L. Ass’n, 157 Fed. Rep. 940; Rabbitt v. Wilcoxen, 103 Iowa 35 ; Heinbokel v. National S. L. & B. Ass’n, 58 Minn. 340 . … Wilcoxen, 103 Iowa 35 ; Hohenshell v. Home Savings Association, 140 Mo. 566 ; Reitz v. Hayward, 100 Mo. App. 216 ; Fort Smith Building Association v. Cohn, 75 Ark. 497 ; Alexander v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Aikman v. Armstrong

    81 N.J. Eq. 427 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 7, 1913

    Brown v. Mugway, 15 N. J. Law (3 Gr.) 330. … See Gulick v. Gulick, 27 N. J. Eq. (12 C. E. Gr.) 498.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Laing v. Durand

    84 N.J. Eq. 404 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 10, 1915

    Van Wagenen v. Bonnot, 72 N. J. Eq. 143, concurred in by the court of errors and appeals, 74 N. J. Eq. 843; Cook v. Lum, 55 N. J. Law 373; Ridden v. Thrall, 125 N. Y. 572 . … Stevenson v. Earl, 65 N. J. Eq. 721.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fay v. Fay

    50 N.J. Eq. 260 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892

    In Donlin v. … In Stewart v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Young v. Frier

    9 N.J. Eq. 465 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1853

    In Mellville v. Brown, 1 Harr. Rep. 364 ; and in Edgar v. Clevenger, 1 G. C. R. 258, this doctrine was recognized and acted upon as laid down by Chancellor Kent in 4 J. C. … Cited in Robert v. Hodges & Fuller, 1 C. E. Gr. 303; Mittnight v. Smith, 2 C. E. Gr. 262; Holdrege y. Gwynne, 3 C. E. Gr. 31; Tantum v. Green, 6 C. E. Gr. 365; Stewart v. Walters, 9 Vr. 277 ; Davis v Dean, 11 C. E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schneider v. the Hamilton Trust Co.

    105 N.J. Eq. 373 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 12, 1929

    Agnew Co. v. Board of Education, 83 N.J. Eq. 49 . … Janes v. Falk, 50 N.J. Eq. 468 ; Collins v. Steuart, 58 N.J. Eq. 392 . The exchange of the stock for the receipts was not void because made after insolvency.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • MacFarlane v. Richardson

    56 N.J. Eq. 191 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 27, 1897

    Emery, V. C. … In National Bank of the Metropolis v. Sprague, 6 C. E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Administrator with the Will Annexed of Smith v. Wood

    42 N.J. Eq. 563 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1887

    Justice Potts, in Garretson v. Brown, 2 Dutch. 425, 440, said that any fraudulent disposition which the assignor may have made of his property is liable to be avoided by his assignee. … Mulford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.