Case law

Sisson v. Tenafly Trust Co.

133 N.J. Eq. 497 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1943

The rule is laid down in Girard Trust Co. v. Schmitz, 129 N.J. … Peer v. Jenkins, 102 N.J. Eq. 235 ; Johnson v. Haldane, 95 N.J.

Kinsela's Administrator v. Cataract City Bank

18 N.J. Eq. 158 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1866

They chose a president of the bank, but they had no legal power to do so; but they had the power to choose a board of directors, and under the direction of the board to do banking business, loan money, and “ choose one of … Cas. 137, and numerous cases collected in the notes to Le Neve v. Le Neve, 2 White & Tudor’s Eq. Cas. [34.]

Nelson v. American Trust Co.

104 N.J. Eq. 594 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 12, 1929

In Brown v. Pinniger, 81 N.J. … White v. Weaver, 68 N.J. Eq. 644 .

Buck v. Beckman

102 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 31, 1927

Feit v. Richards, 64 N.J. Eq. 16 ; Krueger v. Frederick, 88 N.J. Eq. 258 ; Gulick v. Gulick, 27 N.J. Eq. 498 ; Traphagen v. Levy, 45 N.J. Eq. 448 , and Jennings v. Reed, 75 N.J. … The Trenton Trust and Safe Deposit Co. v. Armstrong, 70 N.J. Eq. 572 . In that case Vice-Chancellor Bergen quoted from the English cases of Eaton v. Hewitt, 2 Drew and S. 184-192 , and Browne v. Hammond, John's.

Ryder v. Ryder

136 N.J. Eq. 279 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 26, 1945

Chandler v. Thompson, 62 N.J. Eq. 723 ; 48 Atl. Rep. 583 ; Brown v. Fidelity Trust Co., 82 N.J. Eq. 323 ; 87 Atl. Rep. 222 . … Executors of Vanness v. Jacobus, 17 N.J. Eq. 153 ; Haggerty v. Lanterman, 30 N.J. Eq. 37 ; Smith v. Mooney, 5 N.J. Mis. R. 1087; 139 Atl. Rep. 513 ; Hill v. Van Sant, 133 N.J. Eq. 133 ; 30 Atl. Rep. 2d 904; Bostock v.

Horwath v. Horwath

91 N.J. Eq. 435 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 26, 1920

Daggers v. Van Dyck, 37 N. J. Eq. 130 (at p. 132); Whelan v. Osgoodby, 62 N. J. Eq. 571 (at p. 575). … Rector v. Rector, 79 Atl. Rep. 295 ; Raymond v. Raymond, 79 Atl. Rep. 430 .

Flockhart v. Local No. 40, International Moulders' Union

88 N.J. Eq. 248 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 2, 1917

Lane, V. C. (orally). I adjudge Stevenson guilty of contempt. … His attitude of mind is disclosed by the resolution that he offered in Bochester, New York, at a meeting of the International Moulders’ Hnion, on September 19th, congratulating one of the members of the police board of the

Lundie v. Walker

126 N.J. Eq. 497 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 27, 1939

Cochran v. Elwell, 46 N.J. Eq. 333 ; affirmed, sub nom. Campbell v. Cochran, 48 N.J. Eq. 307 . … Hard v. Turnure, 39 N.J. Eq. 121 ; Tuttle v. Woolworth, 62 N.J. Eq. 532 ; In re Buzby, 93 N.J. Eq. 411 ; reversed on other grounds, 94 N.J. Eq. 151 ; In re Hubert, 98 N.J. Eq. 35 ; affirmed, 99 N.J. Eq. 886 ; Brown v.

Administrators of Read v. Cramer

2 N.J. Eq. 277 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1839

Bingham v. Bingham, 1 Vesey, sen. 126; Gee v. Spencer, l Vernon, 32; Evans v. Llewellyn, 2 Brown’s Ch. 151 ; De Riemer v. De Cautillon, 4 Johns. Ch. 88 ; 1 Story’s Eq. 159, 160.

Johnston v. Jones

23 N.J. Eq. 216 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1872

In Doremus v. … In the case of Den v.

Blair v. Scribner

65 N.J. Eq. 498 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 30, 1904

In Blundell v. Pope, 21 Atl. … In Johnson v.

Dintenfass v. Willat Film Corp.

108 N.J. Eq. 195 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 21, 1931

Camden and Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Mays Landing, c., Railroad Co., 48 N.J. Law 530 ; Jersey City v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 72 *Page 199 N.J. Law 383; Board of Education of Millville v.

Langstroth v. Golding

41 N.J. Eq. 49 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

The case cited, Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y. 136 , does not support it. … Long v. Short, 1 P. Wms. 403; Shreve v. Shreve, 2 C. E. Gr.487; Thomas v. Thomas, Id. 356.

Schenck v. Spring Lake Beach Improvement Co.

47 N.J. Eq. 44 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1890

Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Goddard, 14 How. 453 ; Ford v. Williams, 21 How. 287. … Chadwick v. Maden, 9 Hare 188 ; *51 City of Providence v. Miller, 11 R. I. 272, and Williams v. Christie, 4 Duer 29 , are cases of the latter class.

Taylor v. Common Council of Lambertville

43 N.J. Eq. 107 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1887

See also Bank of Columbia v. Patterson, 7 Cranch 299 ; Mott v. Hicks, 1 Cow. 513, 532 . … These views seem to be fully sustained by the following cases: City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Co., 4. S. W. Rep. 143; Waterhury v. Laredo, 5 S. W. Rep. 81 ; Davenport v. Kleinschmidt, 18 Pac.

Lovett v. Taylor

54 N.J. Eq. 311 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

Brown Stat. F. §§ 95, 499 and cases cited; 3 Reed Stat. F. § 899; Montacute v. Maxwell, 1 P. … And the supreme court of Illinois, in Williams v. Brown, 14 Ill. 200 , said tersely: “ Ho contract between parties can make a resulting trust.” And Chancellor Williamson, *318 in Baldwin v.

Kline v. McGuckin

24 N.J. Eq. 411 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1874

In Van Keuren v. McLaughlin, 4 C. E. … Dunham v. Dey, 2 Johns. Ch. 188 , and 15 Johnson 555 ; Kelleran v. Brown, 4 Mass. 445 .

Arnold v. Searing

78 N.J. Eq. 146 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 15, 1910

As promoters it was their duty to provide an independent and impartial board of directors (Plaquemines Tropical Fruit Co. v. Buck, 52 N. J. … Emery v. Parrott, 107 Mass. 95 ; Lydney and Wigpool Iron Ore Co. v. Bird, 33 C. D. 85; Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Lewis, 4 C. P.

Internat'nal, C., Paterson v. Internat'nal, C.

113 N.J. Eq. 585 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 28, 1933

would seem that the power to merge locals resides in the international office, a body of twenty-one members, composed of the international president, secretary and treasurer, eight members of the international executive board … that suit is to be deemed to have been upon the merits, it is conceivable that the judgment upon the issues against the voluntary body inures to Local 52 under the second subdivision of the rule of res adjudicata in Nagel v.

Vreeland v. New Jersey Stone Co.

25 N.J. Eq. 140 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1874

Pl., § 605; Hogencamp v. Ackerman, 2 Stockt. 267; Brown v. Fuller, 2 Beas. 271. This rule is strictly adhered to in cases of fraud, llech. Bank v. Levy, 1 Edw. 316 ; Scull v. Reeves, 2 Green’s Ch. 84; Smith v. … Mervin v. Smith, 1 Green’s Ch. 182; Scull v. Reeves, 2 Green’s Ch. 84; Everly v. Rice, 3 Green’s Ch. 553; Teasey v. Baker, 4 C. E. Green 61.