Case law

O'Brien v. New England, C., Insurance Co.

128 N.J. Eq. 590 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1941

Sullivan v. Maroney, 76 N.J. Eq. 104 ; 77 N.J. Eq. 565 . Mr. Justice Parker there distinguished Landrum v. … Kelly v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co., 32 Fed. Rep. 2d 811; 52 Fed. Rep. 2d 9; Browne v. John Hancock Mutual Life *Page 595 Insurance Co. (Pa.), 180 Atl. Rep. 746 .

Diocese of Trenton v. Toman

74 N.J. Eq. 702 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 22, 1908

The case of French v. Marstin, ubi supra, was this: M owned what he called his “mountain pasture,” consisting of the Bean, the Brown and the Scheafe lots. … He contended that he had the right of way to this pasture over the land of E, but there was no *710 evidence that he had any such right to the Brown and Scheafe lots.

Sohege v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

73 N.J. Eq. 567 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 19, 1907

Justice Field says, in Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. … The other case is Hart v. Sansom, 110 U. S. 151 . It has generally been understood since the decision in Arndt v. Griggs, 134. U. S. 328, that Hart v. Sansom was not a case of universal application.

Schradin v. Harry W. Bealer Co.

114 N.J. Eq. 459 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1933

Board of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic County v. Weymouth, 68 N.J. Law 652 . A tax, in its essential characteristics, is not a debt, nor in the nature of a debt. … City of Camden v. Allen, 26 N.J. Law 398 ; Baker v. City of East Orange, 95 N.J. Law 365 .

Trenton Passenger Railway Co. v. Wilson

53 N.J. Eq. 577 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1895

Emery, V. C. The bill in this case is filed by the Trenton Passenger Railway Company against Samuel K. … Romaine v. Hendrickson’s Executors, 9 C. E. Gr. 231, 238 (Chancellor Zabriskie, 1873).

Mayor of South Amboy v. Pennsylvania Railroad

76 N.J. Eq. 57 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 1, 1909

L. (2d ed.) 1224; Scheimer v. Price, 65 Mich. 638 ; Talmage v. Huntting, 29 N. Y. 447 ; People v. Judges, &c., 24 Wend. 491 ; Morse v. Ranno, 32 Vt. 600, 607 ; Savings Bank v. Stockwell, 84 Mich. 586 ; Harlow v. … It is also argued that the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Middlesex are misjoined as a party complainant.

Jackson v. Bell

31 N.J. Eq. 554 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1879

Brown ads. Hendrickson, 10 Vr. 239 . And the same practice prevails in equity, regardless of the nature of the demand upon which the judgment is founded, whether it be a debt or a tort. Williams v. … Rawson v. Samuel, ubi supra; Stimson v. Hall, 1 H. & N. 831; Atterbury v. Jarvie, 2 H. & N. 114. Chancellor Kent, in Duncan v. Lyon, 3 Johns.

Morehouse v. Kissam

58 N.J. Eq. 364 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 30, 1899

Stevens, V. C. … The chancellor cites, as authority for his decision in that-case, Bailey v. Burton, 8 Wend. 347 , which, in turn, rests upon Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns.

Lotz v. Rippe

2 N.J. Misc. 754 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 26, 1924

Foster, V. C. This is an action to compel the specific performance of a written contract for the sale of real estate in Monmouth county, made by complainant with the decedent, Annie E. Rippe, on June 19th, 19.19. … Complainant entered into possession of the property, except the dwelling-house, and he continued to board with Mrs. Rippe, paying her $5 weekly.

McGlynn v. McGlynn

101 N.J. Eq. 66 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1927

Cook v. Cook, 20 N.J. Eq. 375 ; Brown v. Fidelity Trust Co., 82 N.J. Eq. 323 . … Ker v. Banta, 71 N.J. Eq. 49 .

Whittaker v. Amwell National Bank

52 N.J. Eq. 400 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1894

V. … Hudkins v. Ward, 30 W. Va. 204 ; Ellis v. Temple, 4 Coldw. 315 ; General Ins. Co. v. United States Ins. Co., 10 Md. 517 ; Woollen’s Exrs. v. Hillon’s Exr., 9 Gill 185 ; Jones v.

McGean v. McGean

60 N.J. Eq. 21 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 22, 1900

Nelson, assisted her in domestic wotIc, and paid $1 a month fox board. She visited her mother in Brooklyn frequently. … In each of the cases of Streitwolf v. Streitwolf and Dumont v.

Davis v. Howell

33 N.J. Eq. 72 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880

Cammack v. Johnson, 1 Gr. Ch. 163; Matlack v. James, 2 Beas. 126; Mittnight v. Smith, 2 C. E. Gr. 259; Scull v. Alter, 1 Harr. 147 ; Curtis v. Hollingshead, 2 Gr. 402 ; Brown v. Bissett, 1 Zab. 46; Linford v. … Wisham v. Lippincott, 1 Stock. 353 ; Randolph v. Daly, 1 C. E. Gr. 313; National Bank v. Sprague, 5 C. E. Gr. 13; Howell v. Teel, 2 Stew. Eq. 490.

Van Duyne v. Executors of Van Duyne

14 N.J. Eq. 49 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1861

Hyde v. Baldwin, 17 Pick. 308 ; Stevenson v. Brown, 3 Green’s Ch. *53 R. 503; Remington v. Kirwan, 2 Sch. & Lef. 449 ; 2 Story’s Eq. Jur., § 1077. … Stilwell v. Pease, 3 Green’s Ch. R. 76. In Sehanek v.

Hartshorne v. Hartshorne

2 N.J. Eq. 349 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1840

This subject has been much discussed, but it should now be considered as settled in favor of the jurisdiction, both in England and in this country: Mundy v. Mundy, 2 Vesey, jr. 128; Curtis v. Curtis, 2 Brown’s Ch. … This subject will be found discussed in Waring v. Ward, 7 Vesey, jr. 337; Cumberland v. Coddington, 3 Johns. Ch. 261 ; Stevenson and Woodruff v. Black, Saxton, 342.

Scarano v. Scarano

132 N.J. Eq. 362 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 8, 1942

Hogencamp v. Ackerman and Brown, 24 N. J. Law 133, 136; Coykendall v. Robinson, 39 N. J. Law 98; Taylor v. Hutchinson, 61 N. J. Law 440; 39 Atl. Rep. 664 . … Eq. 488; Parker v. Hartt, 32 N. J. Eq. 225; affirmed, sub nom. Hartt v. Parker, 32 N. J. Eq. 844; Loder v. Allen, 50 N. J. Eq. 631; 25 Atl. Rep. 541 ; Brown v. Coriell, 50 N. J. Eq. 753; 26 Atl. Rep. 915 .

In re the voluntary dissolution & liquidation of Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n

126 N.J. Eq. 469 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 18, 1939

Bigelow, V. C. … Receiver of State Bank v. First National Bank, 34 N. J. Eq. 450; Smalley r. Smalley, 54 N. J. Eq. 591; Salem v. Board of Health, 76 N. J. Eq. 264; Fraser v. Fraser, 77 N. J. Eq. 205; 78 N. J. Eq. 296.

Denman v. Mentz

63 N.J. Eq. 613 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 17, 1902

Huyck v. Andrews, 113 N. Y. 84 . … As to the latter, there -is great force in the following observations of Lord Westbury, in Suffield v. Brown, 4 De G. J. & S. 185.

Trustees of the Union Methodist Episcopal Church v. Wilkinson

36 N.J. Eq. 141 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1882

. §§ 184, 238, 1445; Allen v. McPherson, 1 H. of L. 191; Gould v. Gould, 3 Story 516, 537 ; Quidort’s Adm. v. Pergeaux, 3 C. E. Gr. 472, 477; Ryno’s Ex. v. Ryno’s Adm.,12 C. E. … In Magill v. Brown, Bright. 347, a gift for the poor members of the Friends Society was sustained. In Straus v.

Smith v. Smith

21 N.J. Misc. 273 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 16, 1943

Hand v. Hand, 60 N. J. Eq. 518 (at p. 521); 46 Atl. Rep. 770 ; Tipton v. Randall, 87 N. J. Eq. 387; 101 Atl. Rep. 204 ; Baird v. Board, &c., South Orange, 108 N. J. Eq. 91 (at p. 112); 154 Atl. Rep. 204 ; Wemple v. B. … petitioner and his witnesses, Norma Kopp, investigator, Sol Wasser, chauffeur for Norma Kopp, and Elizabeth Murphy, sister of the petitioner, establishes the following facts: On July 9th, 1942, in the evening the defendant boarded