Case law

City of Northfield v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

85 N.J. Eq. 47 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 20, 1915

Leaming, V. C. … Wolcott v. Melick, 11. N. J. Eq. 204; Ross v. Butler, 19 N. J. Eq. 294, 303; Cleveland v. Citizens Gas Light Co., 20 N. J. Eq. 201; Duncan v. Hayes, 22 N. J. Eq. 25, 29; Board of Health v. Trenton, 63 Atl.

Frome v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Warren

33 N.J. Eq. 464 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881

Fiacre v. Chapman

32 N.J. Eq. 463 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1880

Atwater v. West, 1 Stew. Eq. 361. … Dayton v. Melick, 12 C. E. Gr. 362.

Roberts v. Scull

58 N.J. Eq. 396 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 27, 1899

Tulk v. Moxhay, 2 Phil. 774 . … De Gray v. Monmouth Beach Co., supra.

Atlantic & Suburban Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

84 N.J. Eq. 618 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 16, 1915

Leaming, V. C. … In Ross v. Union Pacific Railway Co., 1 Woolw. 26 , 36, Mr.

Shutts v. United Box, Board & Paper Co.

67 N.J. Eq. 225 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1904

Emery, V. C. … Corp. § 474; Getty v. Devlin, 54 N. Y. 403, 413 ; S. C., 70 N. Y. 504 .

McClintic Marshall Construction Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

83 N.J. Eq. 539 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 8, 1914

See Monmouth Park Association v. Wallis Iron Works, 55 N. J. Law 132: Robinson v. Centenary Fund, 68 N. J. Law 728; Moore v. Durnam, 63 N. J. Eq. 96; Brown v. Norcross, 59 N. J. Eq. 427; Gussow v. Beineson, 76 N. J. … Law 209; Jersey City v. Flynn, 74 N. J. Eq. 104; affirmed, 76 N. J. Eq. 607; Tilton v. McLaughlin, 83 N. J. Law 107; Van Buskirk v. Board of Education, 78 N. J. Law 650.

Delaware River Quarry & Construction Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

88 N.J. Eq. 506 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1918

Backes, V. C. This bill is to enforce municipal mechanics’ liens. Comp. Stat. p. 3315. The Newton Paving Company paved Nottingham Way under contract with the board of freeholders of Mercer county. … Eq. 367; Haupt Company v. Board of Education of Edgewater, 100 Atl. Rep. 337); and a notice filed under the Lis Pendens act (Comp.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Newark City National Bank

48 N.J. Eq. 51 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

The statute incorporating the boards of chosen freeholders of the several counties of this state vests in each board the title to all property held for public use in the county which the board represents, and it also gives … National Bank v. Insurance Co., 104 U. S. 54, 63 .

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

85 N.J. Eq. 290 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 1, 1915

Stevens, V. C. … Co., v. Jersey City, 49 N. J. Law 303; Wilbur v. Trenton Passenger Railway Co., 57 N. J. Law 212; Phillipsburg Electric Co. v. Phillipsburg, 66 N. J. Law 506; Fielders v. *295 North Jersey Street Railway Co., 68 N. J.

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

87 N.J. Eq. 518 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 19, 1917

Lane, V. C.

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

78 N.J. Eq. 20 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 10, 1910

Emery, V. C. … The board also had the right in proper cases to refuse to permit a street railway company to occupy a bridge with its tracks. Elmer v. Freeholders (Supreme Court, 1894), 57 N. J. Law (28 Vr.) 366.

Kitty Kelly Shoe Corp. v. United Retail, C.

126 N.J. Eq. 374 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1939

United States, 208 U.S. 161 ; Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 ; Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33 ; Hitchman Coal and Coke Co. v. Mitchell, supra; Truax v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 ; National Labor Relations Board v. McKay Radio and Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. President of State Bank

38 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

83 N.J. Eq. 589 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 29, 1914

Geiepin, V. O. … In the case of Mayor, &c., of Newark v.

Helfman v. American Light Traction Co.

121 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 9, 1936

United States Steel Corp. v. Hodge ( Court of Errors and Appeals ), supra; Mitchell v. United Box Board and Paper Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 580 , 586 ; 66 Atl. Rep. 938 ; Stephany v. Marsden, 75 N.J. Eq. 90 , 93 ; 71 Atl. … See Mitchell v. United Box Board and Paper Co., supra; Endicott v. Marvel, 81 N.J. Eq. 378 , 382 , 383 ; 87 Atl. Rep. 230 ; Lillard v. Oil, Paint and Drug Co., 70 N.J. Eq. 197 (at p. 205 ); 56 Atl.

McNichol v. Townsend

73 N.J. Eq. 276 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 30, 1907

In Master v. Hansford, 4 Ch. Div. 718, 724, and again in Renals v. Cowlishaw, 9 Ch. … Mulligan v. Jordan, 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 363, 364, 365; Leaver v. Gorman, ante p. 129.

State ex rel. Board of Health v. Borough of Vineland

72 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 13, 1906

Leaming, V. C. The bill in this cause is filed by the attorney-general at the relation of the state board of health, under the provisions of chapter 41 of the laws of 1899 (P. … Board of Health of New Jersey, v. Diamond Paper Mills, 63 N. J. Eq. (18 Dick.) 111; S. C. on appeal, 64 N. J.

Winfield v. Bowen

65 N.J. Eq. 636 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 18, 1903

Brown, was produced as a witness for the defendants. Mr. … Browne St. Fr. (5th ed.) § 263; Johnson v. Hubbell, 2 Stock. 332 ; Gould v. Mansfield, 103 Mass. 408 . There is not the slightest evidence in this case that Captain Cosgrove ever made any promise to- compensate Mrs.

State ex rel. Board of Health v. Diamond Mills Paper Co.

63 N.J. Eq. 111 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 29, 1902

Its execution is entrusted to a state board. It is true, as pointed out in Bingham v. Camden, 11 Vr. 156 , and Alexander v. … Grey v. Greenville and Hudson Railroad Co., 14. Dick. Ch. Rep. 387; affirmed on appeal on this point in 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 768; Attorney-General v. Cockermouth Local Board, L. R. 18 Eq. Cas. 172; Attorney-General v.