Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

2.32s

  • McCran v. Kay

    93 N.J. Eq. 352 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 3, 1921

    In Detwiller v. Hartman, 37 N. J. Eq. 347, Chancellor Runyon quotes with approval the definition of a charity in the legal sense given by Mr. Justice Gray in Jackson v. … MacKenzie v. Trustees, &c., 67 N. J. Eq. 652; Brown v. Condit. 70 N. J. Eq. 440; Rector, &c. St. James Church v. Wilson, 82 N. J. Eq. 546; affirmed, 83 N. J. Eq. 624.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Federal Trust Co.

    119 N.J. Eq. 502 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 13, 1936

    She is now in a nursing home in Montclair where she pays $40 a week for board and care. … Price v. Long, 87 N.J. Eq. 578 ; Pennington v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 65 N.J. Eq. 11 ; New Jersey National Bank and Trust Co. v. Lincoln Mortgage, c., Co., 105 N.J. Eq. 557 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Schaffer v. Krestovnikow

    88 N.J. Eq. 523 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 22, 1918

    Backes, V. C. … Board of Works, 57 N. J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Photo Engraving Co. v. Carl Schonert & Sons, Inc.

    95 N.J. Eq. 12 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 12, 1923

    a business open to all, but a personal right, limited to a few persons of good moral character, with special qualifications, ascertained’ and certified after a long course of study and a thorough examination, by a state board … The supreme court of Massachusetts in Creditors’ National Clearing House v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. East Jersey Water Co.

    78 N.J. Eq. 329 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 17, 1911

    Stevens, V. C. … Stat. p. 2210), provides as follows: “It shall be lawful for the board of aldermen, common council, board of public works, water commissioners, township committee, town committee or other board, body or department of any

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Soper v. Conly

    108 N.J. Eq. 370 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 19, 1929

    Eq. 340 ; City of Millville v. Board of Education of Millville, 100 N.J. Eq. 162 . … Tucker v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County, 1 N.J. Eq. 282 (at p. 287 ); McKinley v. Chosen Freeholders of Union County, supra; McCormick v. Mayor, c., of New Brunswick, supra; Watters v.

    Disapproved by Osterweil v. City of Newark, 116 N.J.L. 227 (1936)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Calame v. Calame

    24 N.J. Eq. 440 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1874

    By the statute of this state above cited, the Court of Chancery is empowered to decree both kinds of divorce : from the bond of matrimony, and from bed and board. … In Schmidt v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • West New York Silk Mill Co. v. Laubsch & Dixon

    53 N.J. Eq. 65 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1894

    Pitney, V. C. This is a motion for an injunction upon bill and answer. … The principle upon which a court of law acts in such cases is stated at length in the opinion in Brown v. Hendrickson, 10 Vr. 239 , from which the learned judge who spoke for the supreme court in this case, quotes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paragon, C., Corp. v. Paragon Laboratories

    99 N.J. Eq. 224 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1925

    On the other hand, the replying affidavits most carefully point out the answers to certain alleged discrepancies described in the affidavit of the defendant Brown, and there are annexed to the same a tabulated statement of … Mandeville v. Harman, 42 N.J. Eq. 185 . But this is not a contract in restraint of trade. It is one creating an unlimited sales agency and is not illegal. Reeves v. Decorah Farmers Co-operative Society (Iowa), 140 N.W.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Wulstein

    48 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

    Bird, V. C. The defendant Bergerow accepted the lease from the complainants of a certain store property. … During the term there were shelves put up, which rested on a base counter and attached to narrow boards or cleats which were attached by nails to the •side-wall.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ocean Beach Ass'n v. Yard

    48 N.J. Eq. 72 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

    Bird, V. C. The controversy in this ease involves the title to portions of the land on which" the seaside resort of Ocean Beach has been -erected. … Wheeler v. Winn, 53 Pa. St. 122 (91 Am. Dec. 186); Fletcher v. Fuller, 120 U. S. 534, 547 , 551 and 553; Casey’s Lessee v. Inloes, 1 Gill 430 ( 39 Am. Dec. 658 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Woodbridge v. Inslee

    37 N.J. Eq. 397 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

    -Gen. v. N. J. R. R. Co., 2 Gr. Ch. 136; Jersey City v. City of Hudson, 2 Beas. 420; M. & E. R. R. Co. v. Prudden, 5 C. E. Gr. 530; Atty.-Gen. v. Brown, *401 9 C. E. Gr. 89. … Township of Greenwich v. E. & A. R. R. Co., 9 C. E. Gr. 217; S. C. on appeal, 10 C. E. Gr. 565.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paul v. Paul

    99 N.J. Eq. 498 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 7, 1926

    Cueman v. Broadnax, 37 N.J. Law 508 , 513 ; Munson v. Berdan, 35 N.J. Eq. 376 ; Wooster v. Cooper, 59 N.J. Eq. 204 , 223 ; Meeker v. Breintnall, 38 N.J. Eq. 345 , 356 ; Lippincott v. Haviland, 93 N.J. Eq. 585 , 587 . … Griscom v. Evans, 40 N.J. Law 402 . And in Van Nostrand v. Board of Reformed Church, 59 N.J.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Morris & Essex Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey City

    63 N.J. Eq. 45 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 20, 1902

    The grant brought in question and sustained in Elizabeth v. … By the rule laid down in Elizabeth v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cooke v. Watson

    30 N.J. Eq. 345 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1879

    Robinson v. Urquhart, 1 Beas. 515; *352 Freeholders of Middlesex v. Thomas, 5 C. E. Gr. 39; Teed v. Carruthers, 2 Y. & C. 30. Of the judgment creditors only Westray & Gibbs have answered. … Baldwin v. Johnson, Sax. 441; Bliss v. Havens, 11 C. E. Gr. 363; Johns v. Norris, 12 C. E. Gr. 485, 487, 488.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sayre v. Mayor of Newark

    58 N.J. Eq. 136 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 11, 1899

    Hackney Local Board, L. R. 20 Eq. 626; Goldsmid v. Tunbridge Wells, L. R. 1 Eq. 161; S. C. on appeal, L. R. 1 Ch. App. 349; Attorney-General v. Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum, L. R. 4 Ch. App. 146; Attorney-General v. … Acton Local Board, L. R. 22 Ch. Div. 221; Morse v. Worcester, 139 Mass. 389 ; Chapman v. City of Rochester, 110 N. Y. 273 ; State v. City of Portland, 74 Me. 268 ; Hayes v. Village of Dwight, 150 Ill. 273 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Sayre v. Mayor of Newark, 60 N.J. Eq. 361 (1900)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tingley v. International Dynelectron Co.

    74 N.J. Eq. 538 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 25, 1908

    Emery, V. C. … It is further alleged that on November 8th, 1905, the board authorized the execution of the chattel mortgage by the president on behalf of the companjq and that Kenyon advanced the $3,500, and the other directors made other

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wilbur v. Win

    89 N.J. Eq. 278 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 3, 1918

    Backes, V. C. This bill is filed to foreclose two mortgages made by Jacob Win to Christian D. Emson, one dated May 23d, 1883, for $3,- *279 000, the other July 9th, 1884, for $1,000. Christian D. … Lockwood v. Thorne, 18 N. Y. 285 ; Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. Prosser, 157 N. Y. 289 ; Spellman v. Muehlfeld, 166 N. Y. 245 ; Brown v. Vandyke, 8 N. J. Eq. 795.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Interstate B. L. Assn.

    126 N.J. Eq. 469 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 18, 1939

    Receiver of State Bank v. First National Bank, 34 N.J. Eq. 450 ; Smalley v. Smalley, 54 N.J. Eq. 591 ; Salem v. Board of Health, 76 N.J. Eq. 264 ; Fraser v. Fraser, 77 N.J. Eq. 205 ; 78 N.J. Eq. 296 . … Pierson Co. v. West Orange-Verona Building Co., 112 N.J. Eq. 426 ; Riedinger v. Mack Machine Co., 117 N.J. Eq. 337 ; Sullivan v. James Leo Co., 124 N.J. Eq. 317 , 326 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Camden Trust Co. v. Birch

    131 N.J. Eq. 542 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 11, 1942

    Brown v. Mugway, 15 N.J. Law 330 ; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Clark, 96 N.J. Eq. 550 ; 126 Atl. Rep. 604 ; Swetland v. Swetland, 100 N.J. Eq. 196 ; 134 Atl. Rep. 822 . … See, also, Redmond v. Gummere, 94 N.J. Eq. 216 ; 119 Atl. Rep. 631 ; Morris v. Martin, 120 N.J. Eq. 143 ; 184 Atl. Rep. 210 , and Schumacher v. Howard Savings Institution, 128 N.J. Eq. 56 ; 15 Atl. Rep. 2d 107.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.